230 likes | 470 Views
NN interaction JISP16: Current status and prospect Bonn, September 1, 2009 Andrey M. Shirokov Moscow State University & Iowa State University. Collaborators: V. Kulikov (Moscow State University) J. Vary, T. Weber, and P. Maris (Iowa State University)
E N D
NN interaction JISP16: Current status and prospectBonn, September 1, 2009Andrey M. ShirokovMoscow State University & Iowa State University Collaborators: V. Kulikov (Moscow State University) J. Vary, T. Weber, and P. Maris (IowaState University) A. Mazur, E. Mazur and S. Zaytsev(Pacific National University)
JISP = J-matrix inverse scattering potential
J-matrix: • Scattering theory in L2 basis: oscillator basis or Laguerre basis • First in atomic physics: H. A. Yamani, L. Fishman, J. Math. Phys. 16 410 (1975). • In nuclear physics (oscillator basis): G. F. Filippov and I. P. Okhrimenko, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 32, 480 (1980) • Inverse scattering: S. A. Zaytsev, Theor. Math. Phys. 115, 575 (1998); A. I. Mazur, S. A. Zaytsev, J. P. Vary, T. A. Weber, Phys. Rev. C 70, 044005 (2004).
JISP NN interaction • NN interaction is a small matrix of the in the oscillator basis: 9ћ truncation, ћ = 40 MeV fast convergence of shell model calculations • Good description of NN data
JISP16 properties • 1992 np data base (2514 data): 2/datum = 1.03 • 1999 np data base (3058 data): 2/datum = 1.05
Ambiguity of JISP interaction • Any unitary transformation of NN Hamiltonian H generates a Phase-equivalent transformation (PET). • Simplest PETs with continuous parameters are used to fit properties of light nuclei in No-core Shell Model (NCSM) calculations.
JISP NN interaction • A. M. Shirokov, A. I. Mazur, S. A. Zaytsev, J. P. Vary, T. A. Weber, Phys. Rev. C 70, 044005 (2004): A ≤ 4 • A. M. Shirokov, J. P. Vary, A. I. Mazur, S. A. Zaytsev, T. A. Weber, Phys. Lett. B 621, 96 (2005): A ≤ 6 — JISP6 • A. M. Shirokov, J. P. Vary, A. I. Mazur, S. A. Zaytsev, T. A. Weber, Phys. Lett. B 644, 33 (2007): A ≤ 16 — JISP16
From effective interactions to full configuration calculations • Extrapolation: Egs(Nmax) = ae-bNmax+ Egs() • Works with bare interaction only • Example: P. Maris, J. P. Vary, A. M. Shirokov, Phys. Rev. C 79, 014308 (2009)
Improved interaction JISP16-09 • Obtained by a more accurate fit to nuclear data
Nuclear matter with JISP16 Thanks to Scott Bogner!
Nuclear matter • JISP16-09 improves NM properties. • Strong dependence on high partial waves makes it possible to fit NM to phenomenological data without violating description of light nuclei.
Role of NNN force? • W. Polyzou and W. Glöckle theorem (Few-body Syst. 9, 97 (1990)): H=T+VijH’=T+V’ij+Vijk, where Vijand V’ijare phase-equivalent, H and H’ are isospectral. Hope:H’=T+V’ij+Vijk H=T+Vij with (approximately) isospectral H and H’ . JISP16 seems to be NN interaction minimizing NNN force. Without NNN force calculations are simpler, calculations are faster, larger model spaces become available.
Conclusions • JISP16 provides a good description of NN data and binding energies, spectra, EM transitions in light nuclei, etc., without NNN forces. • An improved version JISP16-09 providing a more accurate description of nuclei will be available soon. Later this version will be additionally fitted to nuclear matter too. • Further development: description of other observables, e.g., rms radii in heavy enough nuclei, description of heavier nuclei, design of charge-dependent version of the interaction.