330 likes | 525 Views
Engagement Model of Reading Development. John T. Guthrie, Professor Emeritus University of Maryland. Reading in South Africa. Education Progress - Standards of 2005 Reading and Writing Journal PIRLS* Survey with 70 Nations *Progress in International Reading Literacy Study, 2012
E N D
Engagement Model of Reading Development John T. Guthrie, Professor Emeritus University of Maryland
Reading in South Africa • Education Progress - Standards of 2005 • Reading and Writing Journal • PIRLS* Survey with 70 Nations *Progress in International Reading Literacy Study, 2012 • NEEDU^ report - literacy recommendations ^National Education Evaluation and Development Unit. Report, 2012
Needs Assessment Reading in South Africa—2013 • Achievement grade 4—PIRLS survey • SA average below international mean • Similar to Qatar and Botswana • SA distribution was wider than most • Standard error = 7.3; typical was 3.0 • Top fifth in SA similar to top 10 countries • Bottom 40% had few books at home; parents not beyond secondary education; many home language is not the language of test
Pathways to reading achievement: NEEDU report recommendations -- 2012 • Increase learning time in classrooms • Emphasize higher reading comprehension (how and why questions) in grades 2-3 • Use graded sets of reading materials • Increase quantity of books available (each student reads 1 book per week)
Pathways to reading achievement: motivational needs Engagement and motivation grade 4 PIRLS 2011 SA Other* Concl. Student confidence 26% vs. 45% low Students liking reading 22% vs. 27% low Students highly disruptive 21 % vs. 11% high *Other = High scoring Western countries
Pathways to reading achievement: balancing motivational and cognitive needs Reading Instruction-PIRLS 2011- in High scoring countries—(Hong Kong; Finland) Skill and strategy teaching Use textbook— 90% of teachers Use workbook—60% of teachers Engagement and motivation support Moderate use – 60% of teachers Moderate experience—60% of students
Pathways to reading achievement: conclusions Achievement can improved through increasing reading engagement. Teachers may weave engagement and motivation support into instruction for reading skills and strategies at all grades.
Theoretical Foundation for Reading Engagement • Engagement model of reading achievement • International research on educational framework for increasing achievement. • Classroom supports for reading engagement, cognition and motivation. • Guthrie, J. & Klauda, S. (in press). Engagement and motivational processes in reading. In P. Afflerbach. Handbook of Individual Differences in Reading. New York. Routledge publisher. www.corilearning.com
Engagement Model of Reading Development Reading Achievement Components: Reasoning Literal Fluency Vocabulary
Engagement Model of Reading Development Reading Engagement Reading Achievement Components: Reasoning Literal Fluency Vocabulary Components: Effort Enthusiasm Persistence Self-regulation
Engagement Model of Reading Development Motivation in Reading Components: Intrinsic Efficacy Value Social Reading Engagement Reading Achievement Cognition in Reading Components: Reasoning Literal Fluency Vocabulary Components: Effort Enthusiasm Persistence Self-regulation Components: Word rec. Fluency Literal Reasoning
Engagement Model of Reading Development Motivation in Reading Classroom Instruction and Teaching Components: Intrinsic Efficacy Value Social Reading Engagement Reading Achievement Cognition in Reading Components: Reasoning Literal Fluency Vocabulary Components: Effort Enthusiasm Persistence Self-regulation Components: Relevance/choice Success Importance Collaboration Volume Components: Word rec. Fluency Literal Reasoning
Research Evidence for Model • Correlations---across all factors • Unique effects of motivation on engagement; and cognition on engagement. • Growth benefits of motivation on engagement and achievement • Experimental effects of classroom instruction on motivation, engagement and achievement. General-CORI; Specific-experiments.
Community and School Preconditions of Reading Engagement • Students in school, in class • Books available—students read 1 book per week • Students speak language of the books • Teachers focus on reading for understanding • Progress beyond ‘teacher-centered’ classroom (Nigeria study reported teacher read-aloud as prevailing motivation approach)
Community and School Preconditions of Reading Engagement • Attend school and class----Community brainstorm, transportation, parent involvement • Books at home and school---Funding for school and community libraries Home language and English • Language of classroom---- Bilingual education transition to English by end of year 2. • Promote reading for enjoyment at home and school---Reading campaigns, celebrations.
Classroom instruction and teaching: 5 engagement principles • Help students read together • Provide choices in reading • Show immediate benefits of reading • Match texts to student abilities • Enable students to read a lot Guthrie, J. T. (2013). South African Reading: Teaching practices K-12 for engagement and expertise. Unpublished manuscript. www.corilearning.com
Engagement principle #1 Help students read together Grades K-2 • Partners rhyme words; partners alternate reading pages of a story book; Grades 3-5 • Partners read same pages silently, and write a summary together Grades 6-12 • Partners separately identify 3 main points of a text and compare them and reasons for choosing them. Teams of 4 develop an opinion about a topic, write a persuasive essay and present to another team.
Engagement principle #2 Provide choices in reading Grades K-2 • Students choose a book for the teacher to read aloud Grades 3-5 • Students select one section of a history book to learn and teach to team Grades 6-12 • Students identify topic and select several texts to learn from and then write an integrative statement.
Engagement principle #3 Show immediate benefits of reading Grades K-2 • Teacher reads a story aloud; students state one thing they enjoyed. Students read page in an information book; report 1 amazing fact to a partner. Grades 3-5 • Have students state what they learned from a picture in comparison to a page of text on the same topic. Grades 6-12 • Have students write a statement explaining how what they read in a text connects to their observations or experiences outside of school.
Engagement principle #4 Match texts to student abilities Grades K-2 • 90 percent accuracy word recognition Grades 3-5 • 90 percent accuracy read aloud fluency Grades 6-12 • 90 percent accuracy in brief summaries of a page of text
Engagement principle #5 Empower students to read a lot Grades K-2: Expectations: On grade reader: Home = 30 min; School = 30 min. Total = 1.0 hr. Grades 3-5 : Expectations: On grade reader: Home = 30 min; School = 60 min. Total = 1.5 hr. Grades 6-12: Expectations: On grade reader: Home = 90 min; School = 90 min. Total = 3.0 hr. • Diverse books, magazines, internet for enjoyment, knowledge, usefulness Teacher support • Teachers provide time daily for independent reading, based on interest and curriculum. Teachers assign home reading daily.
Ben Carson • Age 10 Baltimore school • Lowest in class • Mother—TV 1 hour per day; Book 1 per week • Teacher – Rock, Obsidian • Class smartest • Harvard graduate • Neurosurgeon: Johns Hopkins University
Engagement principle– balancing motivational and cognitive instruction Cognitive instruction— • Word recognition, fluency, literal comprehension, reasoning with texts • Reasoning = inferencing, searching, structuring, integrating complex information Balance = Direct instruction in cognitive strategies is linked to five motivation practices Lowest achieving primary students (40%) benefit MOST from engagement principles (Pianta)
Cognitive processes of content literacy Reasoning--general • Identify text structure from cues • Form relations among concepts in text • Self-explain meanings • Identify text structure from cues • Diverse knowledge of genre and language Disciplinary reading—specific • History—author perspective, purpose • Science---myriad document and prose types
Strategy instruction in content literacyfrom Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction Direct instruction to enable students to: • Generate inferences between sentences. • Summarize (with Brown and Day procedure) • Concept map with pyramid and webs • Formulate questions • Search systematically for answers
Implementation plan for engagement practices
Professional Development • Professional development—provide teachers brief experiences as students with each engagement support • Educational leaders write unit of instruction with engagement support • Teachers plan in school teams to implement, slowly with coaching • Assessment: observers rate classrooms for reading engagement and expertise
Closing Summary • South African children and teachers have progressed in literacy. • Improvements in reading achievement and engagement are possible. • Theory and evidence reveal an approach to improvement. • Teachers can learn and apply five classroom principles of teaching for engagement. • Schools can create policies for further progress.
Closing thoughts • “Not a day goes by when I don’t read every newspaper I can lay my hands on, wherever I am.” • “Discussion sharpens one’s interest in any subject and accordingly inspires reading and corrects errors.” • “A bright future beckons. The onus is on us, through hard work, honesty and integrity, to reach for the stars.” -----Nelson Mandela