1 / 21

2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR)

2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR). Office of Accountability October 23, 2012. Accountability Progress Reports. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) –federal accountability Academic Performance Index (API) – state accountability Program Improvement (PI)– federal intervention.

chika
Download Presentation

2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012

  2. Accountability Progress Reports • Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) –federal accountability • Academic Performance Index (API) – state accountability • Program Improvement (PI)– federal intervention

  3. District-Level AYP Results

  4. Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) • Elementary & Middle (Grades 2-8) • Percent of students at Proficient or Above on: • California Standards Tests (CST) • English Language Arts • Mathematics • California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) • California Modified Assessment (CMA) • Senior High(Grade 10) • Percent of students at Proficient or Above on: • California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE), Census Administration • California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) Note:Results for students not continuously enrolled and English Learners enrolled for less than one year in U.S. schools are not included in AMO calculations.

  5. District Student Group Growth (2011 to 2012) on Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) * Safe Harbor

  6. 2012 Districtwide API Growth

  7. District Graduation Rates for 2012(Class of 2011)

  8. District-Level AYP Results(District Continues in Year 3 of Program Improvement)

  9. 2012 AYP School-Level Results * Some schools do not meet the criteria for API or graduation rate targets.

  10. 2012 AYP Data for Selected California Urban School Districts

  11. 2012 Academic Performance Index (API) Growth Report

  12. 2010 Growth API District Results

  13. 2012 Growth APISummary of Districtwide Student Group Performance

  14. 2012 Growth API Summary of School Performance(District-Managed Schools) * This includes all schools for which API growth scores were reported, including schools without growth targets.

  15. 2012 Growth API Large Urban District Comparison Data

  16. 2012 Title I Program Improvement Update

  17. 2011 – 12 Program Improvement (PI) Schools • 126 District Schools are in PI • 18 Schools were newly identified for PI • 12 Schools in PI in 2011-12 made AYP • 1 School exited PI

  18. At-Risk Schools that Made AYP in 2012 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS • Barnard • Cabrillo • Chesterton • Gage • Perry CHARTER SCHOOLS • Einstein Academy • Urban Discovery Academy

  19. PI Schools that Made AYP in 2012 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS • Adams • Baker • Cadman • Carver • Central • Hamilton • Spreckels • Valencia Park MIDDLE SCHOOL • Standley (Exited Program Improvement) • CHARTER SCHOOLS • KIPP Adelante • King/Chavez Academy • O’Farrell

  20. Additional Resources • Office of Accountability http://sandi.net/red • California Department of Education http://www.cde.ca.gov • Accountability Progress Reports (APR) http://www.cde.ca.gov/getschoolreport/

More Related