230 likes | 322 Views
USDA PROCESS VERIFIED. Michael Boland and Renee Sanden Kansas State University Funded by Agricultural Marketing Resource Center. Why is K-State Involved?. Increase awareness of process verification and how it may benefit many different value added ventures
E N D
USDA PROCESS VERIFIED Michael Boland and Renee Sanden Kansas State University Funded by Agricultural Marketing Resource Center
Why is K-State Involved? • Increase awareness of process verification and how it may benefit many different value added ventures • Gain first-hand knowledge about latest USDA certification • Increase rate of learning process for other groups
All Natural Beef Cooperative • Retailers • Rainbow Organic Farms • Kansas State University
Markets • Hen House • 15 locations in the Kansas City area • Price Choppers • 4 locations in Kansas City area • Community Mercantile • One location in Lawrence
All Natural Beef Cooperative • Beef Producer Cooperative • Supplies beef solely to program • Operations vary in size, location and goals
Differentiation • Sought to differentiate themselves from other value added beef programs • Main considerations • Tastes good • Environmentally conscious • Humane treatment of animals • Local production • No hormones or sub-therapeutic antibiotics
Process Verification • USDA system • Based on ISO 9000 • Provides third party audits for a fee • Verifies that self-imposed label claims are credible
Claims • Can be simple or complex as a group chooses • The group wanted their claims to be valuable to the consumer • They also wanted claims to reflect what they were already doing in their production practices
Producer Question • Why did you decide to participate in this program?
GNFF Process Verified Claims • Raised on local, family size farm operations • No growth hormones • No sub-therapeutic antibiotics • 100% vegetarian ration (no animal by-products)
Claims continued… 5) No antibiotics during the finishing phase 6) Source of origin verified from producer through retailer 7) Dry-aged 10-14 days
Producer Question • Why these particular claims?
Program consists of….. • Self-written process verified manual • Training Guides • Major record keeping includes: • Passports for each animal • Internal reviews • Records and affidavits for purchased cattle
Producer Question • What was the training like?
Audit • First Audit, September of 2002 • 2 Auditors came and visited 2 farms, 1 grocery store and the processing facility • Discussions were held to find out what the program was missing to fulfill requirements • Awaiting Process Verification
Producer Question • What kinds of questions were you prepared to answer for the audit? • How did you prepare?
Outcomes • Currently only 8 programs in the U.S. are process verified • Excel Pork, Farmland Pork, PSF (pork), Pro Pork Associates, Berkshire Pork, and Pederson’s Natural Farms • PM Beef Group and Red Angus Association • Consumers are not yet aware of what the label means • Action will be taken to educate consumers once verification is received
Benefits • Producer • Prepared for COOL and other regulations with record keeping • Processor • Able to collect data that would otherwise be unavailable • Retailer • Able to gain knowledge and understanding of products they sell
Accomplishments • Increased demand for beef by average of per year 40% each year since 2000 • Average $0.12 per pound premium based on dressed weight since 2001 • High level of communication between producer, processor and retailer. • High level of consumer education
Producer Question • What are the benefits of Process Verification? • What are the drawbacks?
Summary • Need to be linked to consumer preferences • Implies vertical coordination or integration • Not every operation can or should do this • There are some upfront costs • Not major but the big cost is finding a “champion” to lead the process. • Deciding what is to be process verified is important • Source of verification is likely to be the most widely adopted • Not all animals are likely to be process verified