1 / 36

Status of the TPG

Status of the TPG. E.Radicioni MICE coll. Meeting - RAL, 27-29 Oct. 2004. Outline. Recall of the main characteristics Construction and operation First of the detector behavior Design aspects Electronics Field-cage Gas Background.

coral
Download Presentation

Status of the TPG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Status of the TPG E.Radicioni MICE coll. Meeting - RAL, 27-29 Oct. 2004

  2. Outline • Recall of the main characteristics • Construction and operation • First of the detector behavior • Design aspects • Electronics • Field-cage • Gas • Background E.Radicioni

  3. The TPG is a cylindrical TPC equipped with GEM amplification and a special high-resolution pad-plane • TPCs with GEMs are actively studied by several groups around the world in view of the linear collider experiments. • The novelty of the TPG consists in the pad-plane, where projective readout promises high granularity with a reduced number of channels • Dedicated design choices for MICE were • the dimensions (100cm length, 30cm diameter) to fit into the tracker magnet • The gas (He) chosen because of its low conversion probability E.Radicioni

  4. B E Construction solenoid GEM stage drift volume field cage read-out plane E.Radicioni

  5. The GEM foil • Triple-layer structure • Each layer divided in 8 regions, independently powered • Max amplification depends on gas and HV. With good gas it can be as high as 106.\ E.Radicioni

  6. The hexaboard • ~710000 hexagonal pads • size: 300 mm • pitch: 500 mm • grouped into strips along 3 coordinates at 120 degrees (u, v, w) running at different depths E.Radicioni

  7. Strips and pads E.Radicioni

  8. 300 mm 500 mm E.Radicioni

  9. Spot the error … and correct it! E.Radicioni

  10. Hexaboard quality, from this: E.Radicioni

  11. … to this: E.Radicioni

  12. Support structures • outer metal ring • o-rings for gas tightness • stiffener plate • GEMs support rings • guard ring 5 4 2 3 1 E.Radicioni

  13. E.Radicioni

  14. Assembling the detector E.Radicioni

  15. E.Radicioni

  16. E.Radicioni

  17. The dream team at work E.Radicioni

  18. Last computations and timing checks … E.Radicioni

  19. ... what is this detector trying to tell us ??? E.Radicioni

  20. 55Fe source calibration • Absolute energy, equalization • Preamp gain calibration is not included yet • First indications are • Despite the lack of gain equalization, the energy resolution is already quite good • The plots are very sensitive to the cuts on cluster size, as expected from a properly working detector E.Radicioni

  21. 55Fe source • “beam profile” • Unconnected strips • Ill electronic channels • Dead • Noisy E.Radicioni

  22. Capability of seeing detector structures • 55Fe source illuminates the center of the pad plane • Large lines: spacer grid in between the GEMs: 2mm large • Thin lines: non-working electronics channels E.Radicioni

  23. 55Fe source All clusters ≥2 strips ≥3 strips E.Radicioni

  24. U,V vs. W correlations • out-of-line events are due to lack of gain calibration • Correlation is important: it can be exploited as an additional tool for getting rid of fake combinations • In addition to the use of the 3rd projection • Compass is able to reject (almost all) fakes by this technique TPG COMPASS E.Radicioni

  25. Low energy tracks • 500 samples @10MHz • Ar/CO2 90/10, 10cm/s  total 50cm drift path • e- from Sr source • B=0.07T (1/10 nominal) • Color code gives charge amplitude E.Radicioni

  26. 2 MeV/c electron in B=0.07T • Transverse diffusion spreads the charge E.Radicioni

  27. Intrinsic resolution • 55Fe X-ray conversion position can be determined by 2 projections, then cross-checked with the 3rd one. • The intrinsic resolution is VERY promising • This has been obtained with a 3cm drift cell. • Actual resolution over longer drift depends on gas properties. U+V vs. W resolution ~40µm E.Radicioni

  28. Design improvements • Electronics • Ingredients for good resolution • Gas choice • Discussion on overall parameters • A compact emittometer, alias TPG ? E.Radicioni

  29. Electronics • New electronics from ALICE • Higher integration • Total (including DAQ) 10 CHF / channel • Digitization is close to detector (less noise) • Data get out from the detector on a few optical fibers (elegant, simple) • Large range of possible sampling frequencies up to 40 MHz. E.Radicioni

  30. 4cards 16 ch ALTRO EVOLUTION 4 PQFP 100 8 SSOP 28 24 mm 135 mm 20 mm Integrated ADCs 1998 CHANNELS / CHIP: 1 POWER / CH: 120mW PRICE / CH: 50CHF 1999 CHANNELS / CHIP: 4 POWER / CH: 80mW PRICE / CH: 8CHF 2001 CHANNELS / CHIP: 1 POWER / CH: 16mW PRICE / CH: 5CHF

  31. BC II BC I TCF Digital Conditioning of the TPC Signal EV 1 EV 2 EV 1 EV 2 EV 3 EV 3 ADC EV 1 EV 1 EV 2 EV 2 EV 3 EV 3

  32. Momentum resolution • Position resolution is driven by • Readout pitch (fixed) • Diffusion in gas • Ionization and gain • Gas choice is a key point: we should look for larger gain and ionization and smaller diffusions. • Momentum resolution is driven by • Position resolution • Number of available points • From the simple Glukstern formula: 50 points give dp/p resolution factor only 1.5 better than 20 points. • If more distant points are affected by more diffusion, we should really consider limiting the number of points and the drift length. E.Radicioni

  33. Gas choice E.Radicioni

  34. Shorter field-cage? E.Radicioni

  35. Tracks and Background in the short TPG • Intrinsic occupancy limit of the detector: N.strips/cluster size  ~ 200 • By exploiting correlations (a-la-compass) one could maybe do better • 1 muon per s  6 tracks in one “image” • Number of background tracks (normalized per MHz imput photons) ~ 0.013 MHz-1 • Quoting Rikard’s computations: 22MHz of photons entering the tracker volume in the upstream spectrometer  if this rate is OK there will not be any trouble. • Photon conversion in the HV membrane could account to the same number as conversions in gas  not much of a difference. E.Radicioni

  36. Conclusions • The TPG detector is operational in the HARP test-bed • Placed an order for 2000 channels of the new electronics • First results indicate performances at the expected level or better • Several design parameters can be reviewed • Better gas choice  better resolution • Shorter detector  less material, straightforward construction, compact, could stay in shorter solenoid. • Faster drift time  less X-ray background • Better resolution • More results from beam tests in the near future E.Radicioni

More Related