200 likes | 490 Views
NAVY-INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL DIALOG. V-22 Program Brief. Col Craig Olson and Michael Tkach NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004. Disclaimer. This briefing may contain references to projected U.S. Government plans and potential system capabilities.
E N D
NAVY-INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL DIALOG V-22 Program Brief Col Craig Olson and Michael Tkach NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004
Disclaimer This briefing may contain references to projected U.S. Government plans and potential system capabilities. Mention of them in no way guarantees that the U.S. government will follow these plans or that any of the associated system capabilities, if developed, will be available or releasable to foreign governments
Reviews / Redesign / Restructure • 2 mishaps in CY 2000 • Operational pause • 12 reviews incl BRP, NASA, GAO, DODIG, Engineering • Redesign of electrical and hydraulic line clearances, flight control software, and cautions / warnings / advisories • Most extensive Flight Readiness Review in 2002 • O-6, 1 star, 3 Star • 18 organizations incl NAVAIR, ASC, COMOPTEVFOR, SOCOM, AFOTEC, HQMC, AFSOC • Restructured JPO and flight test program • Gov’t / contractor collocated IPTs • Event driven flight test • Frequent EXCOMMs • Returned to flight on May 29, 2002
BRP & NASA Summaries • BRP Conclusions • "…the Panel recommends that the Department proceed with the V-22 Program, but temporarily reduce production to a minimum sustaining level to provide funds for a Development Maturity Phase." • NASA Conclusion • "There are no known aeromechanics phenomena that would stop the safe and orderly development and deployment of the V-22." • Specific recommendations to flight test program
CV-22 IPT Col. Garvin Ms. Caldwell Mr. Griffin Training LtCol Schueler Mr. Sullivan MV-22 IPT Mr. Raggets LtCol Gross Mr. Peasley V-22 Joint Program Office Legend: Leadership Team Special Staff to PMPAO Mr. CarrollCounsel Mr. Biglin Security Mr. Lyons V-22 PMCol Olson / Mr.TkachV-22 DPMCol Taylor / Mr. Buyers Integrated Product Teams FMS / Bus Dev Mr. Moritz / Mr. Goode OperationsMr. Wellmann / Mr. Dykes WSI CAPT Black / Ms. Bose Mr. Groenenboom MS III/FRP/S&T CDR Roof Maj Harris Logistics Mr. Bernard Mr. Burcham Risk IT CM Affordability Contracts Mr. J. Gerber Ms. Whitling BFM Mr Lowien Ms. Whitling Concurrency Integration Ms. Paris System Integration Capt Oyama Cost Analysis Ms. Ryan Ms. Whitling MV-22 Test Mr. Byrne / LtCol Witzig / LCDR Stuart CV-22 Test Mr. Sisterman / Maj Weber / Maj Pittman Development / Mods Mr. Merritt / Mr. Goodley Mr. Weaver Production Mr. Hite / Ms. Sanders Mr. Porter Development / Mods Mr. Jackson/ Maj White / Mr. Frazer Engineering Mr Baile Mr. Moorman Block A Maj Cox Block B Ms. Herold Block C Maj Rumsey Block 0 / 10 Ms. Jackson Block 20 TBD Sustainment LtCol Scherer / Mr. Burcham / LtCol Tavares Sustainment LtCol Peters / Mr. Burcham Draft
Multi-Mission Tiltrotor AircraftJoint Service AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT PERSONNEL RECOVERY LONG-RANGE SPECIAL OPERATIONS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS FLEET LOGISTIC SUPPORT AERIAL REFUELER SUSTAINED LAND OPERATIONS EVACUATIONS AND MARITIME SPECIAL OPERATIONS SPECIAL WARFARE SELF-DEPLOYMENT USMC USSOCOM USN 360 MVs 50 CVs 48 MVs
V-22 General Description Medium lift replacement for CH-46E and CH-53D Versatility of a helicopter.... + …. with the speed and range of a turboprop 32,000 Standard Day C-130 • Plus significant operational enhancements • Susceptibility and vulnerability reductions • Frontline survivability • Reliability and maintainability improvements • Availability and Dependability 16,000 H-60 V-22 Tiltrotor Altitude Ft Airspeed Kts 0 350
MV-22 Mission: Vertical-lift, assault support of combat troops, supplies, and equipment MV-22 Mission: Vertical-lift, assault support of combat troops, supplies, and equipment MV-22 vs CH-46E vs CH-60 Combat Mission Radius CH-53D Operational Limit 200 nm Combat Radius V-22 Operational Limit 240+ nm Combat Radius CH-46 Operational Limit 75 nm Combat Radius Lifting a 975-Marine Battalion Landing Zone Distance 75nm CH-46 MV-22 Sorties: 82 Sorties: 41 12 Aircraft: 8-9 waves 12 Aircraft: 4 waves 12 hrs 3 hrs Landing Zone Distance 200nm CH-53D MV-22 Sorties: 41 Sorties: 41 12 Aircraft: 4 waves 12 Aircraft: 4 waves 16 hrs 8 hrs
V-22 Schedule Time Now MV-22 Development Block A Safe & Operational Block B Enhanced Maintainability Block C Mission Enhancements FOT&E FOT&E T&E OT-IIF OT-IIG OPEVAL Decision Review MS III IPR (Blk C) IOC Aircraft Procurement Block B Production (QTY) Block B Mod/Retrofit (QTY) Block C (QTY) CV-22 Development Block 0/10 MMR/SIRFC/DIRCM OUE IOT&E FOT&E Block 20 SOCOM Mission Enhancements Block 20 Air Force Mission Enhancements FOT&E Decision Review IPR (Blk 10) IPR (Blk 20) AF IPR (Blk 20) S PRTVs ATA Aircraft Procurement Block 0/10 (QTY) Block 20 SOCOM (QTY) Block 20 Air Force (QTY) Lot 8 Lot 9 Lot 10 Lot 11 Lot 12 Lot 13 Lot 14 Lot 15 Lot 16 Lot 17 Lot 18 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11 FY11
V-22 Spiral Development Evolutionary Acquisition • Two development processes to implement Evolutionary Acquisition Strategy • Incremental development: End-state requirement is known, and requirement will be met over time in several increments. • Spiral development: Desired capability is identified, but end-state requirements are not known at Program Initiation. Requirements for future increments dependent upon technology maturation and user feed back from initial increments. • Evolutionary acquisition strategy is the preferred approach to meeting operational needs • Spiral development is the preferred process
MV-22 Description • Block A – Safe and Operational • Line clearance improvements • Flight control software changes • Block B – Enhanced Maintainability • Effectiveness and suitability improvements for the fleet • Block C – Preplanned Product Improvements
MV-22 Performance MV-22 Mission Performance Summary SD-572 Mission KPP Thresholds @ Block A Projected Wt Remarks Land Assault - Ext Cargo X 50 NM 63.3 NM Land Assault - Troops 200 NM 245.9 NM Amphib Assault – External Cargo 50 NM 130.1 NM Amphib Assault - Troops 50 NM 82.2 NM Pre - Assault Raid X 200 NM 268.6 NM With Block B WAT, MAT kits X 2,100 NM 2,384 NM1 Self – Deployment (3 x 430 gal) Max MCP Cruise Speed X 240 KTAS 264.8 KTAS 1Pending latest performance estimate with forward MAT only 80% full Above 5 % Margin 0 – 5 % Margin Below Threshold Ref: Jul 04 Aero/Perf Summary
CV-22 Description • Multi-mode • Terrain Following / Terrain Avoidance Radar • Additional internal fuel • Suite of Integrated RF Countermeasures • Directional IR Countermeasures (Laser Turrets) • Airframe 90% • Avionics 40% • Propulsion 100% MV & CV Commonality
CV-22 Performance CV-22 Mission Performance Summary SD-572 Mission KPP Thresholds @ Block 0/10 Projected Wt Remarks Change in MAT design X 500 NM 552 NM1 Special Operations Mission Radius Retractable Air Refueling Probe X 2100 NM 2231 NM2 Self-Deployment (2 x 430 gal) X 230 NM 235 KTAS Max MCP Cruise Speed 300 ft. TF/TA VMC/IMC Currently testing 200’ airplane/100’ conv mode TF X Operational Environment X Operational Environment DIRCM, SIRFC jamming DECM (SIRFC RWR) Satisfy Top Level IERs Interoperability X X Payload (Troops/Cargo) 18/8000 Ref: Nov 04 Aero/Perf Summary Above 5 % Margin 0 – 5 % Margin Below Threshold
Pax 7 MV-22s Flight control system software Line Clearance HROD Low airspeed combat maneuverability Shipboard compatibility (incl roll on deck) Emergency landing profile demo Aerial Delivery Ice Protection System Formation flight Edwards 2 CV-22s CV performance Terrain following Suite of Integrated Radio Frequency Countermeasures DT: Aggressively Kicking Over Every Rock Safe, Methodical, and Event Driven – 1969 hours
Operational Assessment vs Operational Evaluation Comparison • OA (OT-IIF) • Event driven • Started 18 May; Completed on 2 July 04 • 3 acft – 120 + flt hrs • Limited scope • Test areas • Day / VMC • IAW published restrictions • Risk reduction for OT-IIG • OPEVAL (OT-IIG) • Event driven – 5 months • Feb to June 05 • Up to 8 acft – 400+ flt hrs • Complete formal evaluation • Test to TEMP / JORD • COTF recommendation to Milestone Decision Authority “Effective and Suitable” supports full rate production decision (Nov 05) COTF Final report Issued
VMX-22 Build-up Summary Accomplishments from Nov 2003 stand-up to date • Accepted 14 aircraft • Flown over 2900 hours • Completed OT-IIF (May-June 04) • Austere landings (Sept-Oct 04) Nellis AFB • Validation & Verification of IETM’s • Mission area training • Air Refueling • Para Ops • External lifts • Cargo drops • Fast rope • Formation • Carrier qualifications • Night Vision Goggle • All in preparation for OPEVAL start in Feb 2005
Operational Test -IIG 1 Wk 8 A/C 1 Wk 2 A/C Bridgeport MCAS NR Shipboard • NEW RIVER • Final OPEVAL training • Non-scenario JORD, KPP and specific events items if req’d. • Environmental Compatibility, Cold TTP development • Shipboard JORD profiles • Scenario based testing andTTP development 1 Wks 2 A/C MCAS Yuma China Lake China Lake Test Aircraft Shipboard 2-3 A/C for Risk Mitigation MCAS New River for Test clean-up Tactics Survivability • Scenario based Asslt Spt, Tactics, Self-deploy, and Interoperability • Scenario based Survivability, TTP development Self-deploy Self-deploy 3 Wks 3 A/C 4 Wks 8 A/C 4 Wks 8 A/C 2 Wks 8 A/C 3 Wks 8 A/C
Summary • Since return to flight May 2002 we have had 4 years of successful Event Driven, Development and Operational Testing • Currently, 4,869 hours of DT and OT in preparation for OPEVAL • We have every confidence in handing the aircraft over to VMX-22 for OPEVAL • The JPO believes the V-22 will be judged Effective and Suitable for Full Rate Production decision this fall