1 / 26

Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

doctorrao
Download Presentation

Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Carbapenem resistant enterobacteriaceae update 2012 Dr.T.V.Rao MD Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  2. What are Carbapenem resistant enterobacteriaceae ? • Eenterobacteriaceae strains resistant to Carbapenem have emerged in the past decade • Wide-spread outbreaks have been reported in recent years • No reliable treatment options • Huge reservoir of carriers in healthy population • Easy species-to-species spread • Potential devastating health consequences Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  3. Uses by Clinical Syndrome Bacterial meningitis Hospital-associated sinusitis Sepsis of unknown origin Hospital-associated pneumonia How are Carbapenems Used? Use by Clinical Isolate • Acinetobacter spp. • Pseudomonas aeruginosa • Alcaligenes spp. • Enterobacteriaceae • Mogenella spp. • Serratia spp. • Enterobacter spp. • Citrobacter spp. • ESBL or AmpC + E. coli and Klebsiella spp. Reference: Sanford Guide Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  4. Spectrum of Activity

  5. Uses by Clinical Syndrome Bacterial meningitis Hospital-associated sinusitis Sepsis of unknown origin Hospital-associated pneumonia How are Carbapenems Used? Use by Clinical Isolate • Acinetobacter spp. • Pseudomonas aeruginosa • Alcaligenes spp. • Enterobacteriaceae • Mogenella spp. • Serratia spp. • Enterobacter spp. • Citrobacter spp. • ESBL or AmpC + E. coli and Klebsiella spp. Reference: Sanford Guide Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  6. Significantly limits treatment options for life-threatening infections No new drugs for gram-negative bacilli Emerging resistance mechanisms, carbapenemases are mobile, Detection of carbapenemases and implementation of infection control practices are necessary to limit spread Emerging Carbapenem Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacilli Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  7. Defining Carbapenem resistance • Definitions for CRE are complicated by a number of factors including the diversity of the genera. Another important challenge to developing a standardized definition of CRE is a recent (mid-2010) change in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretative criteria (breakpoints) for determining susceptibility to Carbapenems among Enterobacteriaceae. Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  8. Carbapenemases

  9. KPC’s in Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa – Columbia & Puerto Rico

  10. Surveillance definition - CDC • CDC has developed the following interim surveillance definition for CRE. CRE are defined as Enterobacteriaceae that are: Nonsusceptible to one of the following Carbapenems: doripenem, meropenem, or imipenem AND Resistant to all of the following third-generation cephalosporin that were tested: ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and ceftazidime. (Note: All three of these antimicrobials are recommended as part of the primary or secondary susceptibility panels for Enterobacteriaceae) Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  11. KPC Enzymes • Located on plasmids; conjugative and nonconjugativeblaKPC is usually flanked by transposon sequences • blaKPC reported on plasmids with: • Normal spectrum b-lactamases • Extended spectrum b-lactamases • Aminoglycoside resistance Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  12. Changing breakpoints – no need for Hodge test • These new recommendations lowered the breakpoints and removed the requirement for testing for carbapenemases (e.g., modified Hodge Test) to determine susceptibility. Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  13. CRE are epidemiologically important for several reasons: • CRE have been associated with high mortality rates (up to 40 to 50% in some studies). In addition to β-lactam/Carbapenem resistance, CRE often carry genes that confer high levels of resistance to many other antimicrobials, often leaving very limited therapeutic options. “Pan-resistant” KPC-producing strains have been reported. • CRE have spread throughout many parts of the United States and have the potential to spread more widely. Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  14. Screening for CRe • Screening is used to identify unrecognized CRE colonization among epidemiologically-linked contacts of known CRE colonized or infected patients as clinical cultures will usually identify only a fraction of all patients with CRE. Generally, this screening has involved stool, rectal, or peri-rectal cultures and sometimes cultures of wounds or urine (if a urinary catheter is present). Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  15. A new carbapenemases • New Delhi metallo-b-lactamase (NDM-1) • class B b-lactamase • plasmid carrying encoding gene blaNDM • first detected in 2009 from an isolate of K. pneumoniae • Swedish patient with antibiotic-resistant infection acquired and unsuccessfully treated in New Delhi, India • novel gene identified in Sweden Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  16. A new carbapenemases 14 out of 24 patients come from ICU “New Delhi Metallo-β lactamase (NDM-1) in Enterobacteriaceae: Treatment options with Carbapenems Compromised”. Journal of Association of Physicians of India 58: 147–150, March 2010 Dr.T.V.Rao MD • New Delhi metallo-b-lactamase (NDM-1) • over a 3-month period in Mumbai, India, 24 cases of carbapenam resistant isolates were identified • 22 carry the NDM-1 gene • K. pneumoniae (10) • E. coli (9) • 14 samples from ICU • Carbapenem-resistance 0%  8% in 3 years

  17. Some isolates are inherently resistant to Imipenem • For bacteria that have intrinsic imipenem nonsusceptibility (i.e., Morganella morganii, Proteus spp., Providencia spp.), requiring nonsusceptibility to Carbapenems other than imipenem as part of the definition might increase specificity. Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  18. Screening for Carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae • Screening is used to identify unrecognized CRE colonization among epidemiologically-linked contacts of known CRE colonized or infected patients as clinical cultures will usually identify only a fraction of all patients with CRE. Generally, this screening has involved stool, rectal, or peri-rectal cultures and sometimes cultures of wounds or urine Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  19. Previous Breakpoints (M100-S19)MIC (μg/mL) Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  20. Current Breakpoints (M100-S22)MIC (μg/mL) Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  21. Tigecycline: Test by Etest if possible – disk diffusion tends to overcall resistance No CLSI breakpoint, but there are FDA breakpoint Susceptible ≤ 2 mg/ml Intermediate = 4 mg/ml Resistant ≥ 8 mg/ml Testing Other Drugs Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  22. Polymyxin B or Colistin Could test either, but colistin used clinically Disk diffusion test does not work – don’t use! Etest – works well, but not FDA cleared Broth micro dilution – reference labs Breakpoints - none MIC ≤ 2 mg/ml, normal MIC range MIC ≥ 4 mg/ml indicates increased resistance Testing Other Drugs Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  23. Surveillance • Inpatient facilities should have an awareness of whether or not CRE (at least E. coli and Klebsiella spp.) have ever been cultured from patients admitted to their facility and, if so, whether these positive cultures were collected within 48 hours of admission. • If CRE have been present, facilities should also determine: If there is evidence of intra-facility transmission Which wards/units are most affected Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  24. What is our role – contain spread • Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae is an emerging threat to hospitalized patients • Global spread • High mortality • Treatment options are limited • Active surveillance should be performed for high risk patients with overseas hospitalization in past 6 months • Contact tracing / screening for confirmed cases • Importance of infection control measures • High vigilance in critically ill ICU patients Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  25. Hand washing still the best option to prevent spread of CRE • Hand hygiene is a primary part of preventing multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission. Facilities should ensure that healthcare personnel are familiar with proper hand hygiene technique as well as its rationale. Dr.T.V.Rao MD

  26. Programme Created by Dr.T.V.Rao MD for Medical and Paramedical students in the Developing World • Email • doctortvrao@gmail.com Dr.T.V.Rao MD

More Related