1 / 4

Calibrating Achievable Design Roundtable Discussion June 9, 2002

Calibrating Achievable Design Roundtable Discussion June 9, 2002. Wayne Dai, Andrew Kahng, Tsu-Jae King, Wojciech Maly, Igor Markov, Herman Schmit, Dennis Sylvester. Facilitator: Bill Joyner, IBM/SRC. Attendees. Faculty

duaa
Download Presentation

Calibrating Achievable Design Roundtable Discussion June 9, 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Calibrating Achievable Design Roundtable Discussion June 9, 2002 Wayne Dai, Andrew Kahng, Tsu-Jae King, Wojciech Maly, Igor Markov, Herman Schmit, Dennis Sylvester Facilitator: Bill Joyner, IBM/SRC

  2. Attendees • Faculty • Herman Schmit, Wojciech Maly, Igor Markov, Dennis Sylvester, Andrew Kahng • Students • Michael Wang, Shuo Zhou, Bao Liu,, Stefanus Mantik, Yu Chen, Mike Oliver • Industry • Bill Joyner, Takahide Inoue, Simon Thomas, James Duley • Other Industry feedback • Sani Nassif

  3. Discussion • What’s the big problem? • Cost tradeoffs need to be understood and modeled! • Comments: 5 cents / mm^2 cost with 90nm technology and 300mm wafers. Reference fab may be constructed and available; possibly available to GSRC? • Variability • What variability is tolerable? (This may be a sub-text to cost.) • Technology utilization • E.g., How to best use 100nm • Comment: we need a utilization vision, not just a technology vision (power? pin-limited?) • Sharing of information (across industry, across academia, across industry-academia) • E.g., shortage of qualified (analog) designers, and the issue of VLSI design education • Comment: Sometimes design is limited by design talent, but the product still gets out (available talent is applied as best it can…) • Is the solution education? (Re-education of old analog designers, education of digital designers in analog issues)

  4. Discussion • What’s being done well? • Knowledge management for CAD and other concepts • Seeding and promoting ideas (collaboration, metrics, open-source) for the participants and within the GSRC and other centers • Motivating and justifying research directions for the other themes. • What could be improved? • Improved avenues for sharing data (esp. fab data) in addition to algorithms • Pushing others to use and adopt the Bookshelf • Become THE source of benchmark design examples and algorithm data • Explore and identify the future applications that will drive silicon consumption

More Related