660 likes | 756 Views
What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About the Law Jeffrey J. Nolan, Esq. Dinse, Knapp & McAndrew, P.C. www.dinse.com. Today’s Presenter. Jeffrey J. Nolan, Esq., Attorney at Dinse, Knapp & McAndrew, P.C. http:// www.dinse.com/attorneys/jeffrey-j-nolan.html Consultant to:
E N D
What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About the LawJeffrey J. Nolan, Esq.Dinse, Knapp & McAndrew, P.C.www.dinse.com
Today’s Presenter • Jeffrey J. Nolan, Esq., Attorney at Dinse, Knapp & McAndrew, P.C. http://www.dinse.com/attorneys/jeffrey-j-nolan.html • Consultant to: • Sigma Threat Management Associates (www.SigmaTMA.com) • Margolis, Healy & Associates (www.Margolis-Healy.com)
Agenda • Common Law Issues • Statutory Issues • Privacy Law Issues • Practical/Risk Management Issues
Scope of Presentation • This is a summary of selected legal issues of interest to student affairs professionals • Not intended or attempting to be exhaustive • Focus is on federal law and commonly-applied common law principles • Does not account for state statutes or case law that applies only in particular states • This is not legal advice- you should consult with counsel about specific situations
Common Law Duties Whether based on potential legal duties or a desire to follow good practice, institutions of higher education generally strive to: • Act reasonably to provide a campus environment that is reasonably safe from foreseeable risks • Hire, training and supervise employees appropriately
Common Law Duties Institutions also strive to: • Deal reasonably with foreseeable risks posed by identified students who may pose a risk of harm to others • Respond reasonably to identified potential self-harm issues • Provide a physically safe campus environment and educational experience
Common Law Duties • Acting reasonably in accordance with standard of care is most basic obligation • Standard of care is informed by: • Court decisions • Statutes and regulations • Widely accepted publications from reputable organizations • Custom, practice in field • Opinions of experts
Common Law Privacy Rights • The common law privacy rights that may protect students include: • The right to be free of undue invasions of privacy • The right to be free of defamation
Common Law Contract Issues • Sources of potential contract obligations to students: • Formal contracts (e.g., housing contracts, financial aid agreements) • Student handbook provisions • Other published institutional policies • Institutions can change them, but usually are applied by courts as written at particular time • Institutions have more leeway in academic matters
Constitutional Due Process • Public institutions cannot deprive students of right to continued participation without first providing: • Notice of charges • Opportunity to be heard in defense • Impartial decision-maker • Report of the decision
Statutory Civil Rights Obligations • Federal statutes prohibit discrimination in education on basis of: • race, color, national origin (Title VI) • sex (Title IX) • disability (Section 504 & Americans with Disabilities Act • age (Age Discrimination Act 1975) • State civil rights laws often include parallel, and some expanded, prohibitions
Federal Enforcement Context • Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”) enforces those laws • OCR: • Investigates individual complaints • Conducts agency-initiated compliance reviews • Provides technical assistance to promote voluntary compliance • Theoretically can terminate federal funding, but practically, negotiates “voluntary compliance”
Title IX • Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq., prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities operated by recipients of Federal financial assistance
OCR Title IX Resources • April 2011 OCR Dear Colleague Letter: http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201104.pdf • OCR 2001 Revised Sexual Harassment Guidance: http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/shguide.pdf • 2010 Dear Colleague letter on Harassment and Bullying: http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201010.pdf
Sexual Harassment Definition • Unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature • includes unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. • Student-to-student harassment: • creates hostile environment if conduct is sufficiently serious that it interferes with or limits a student’s ability to participate in or benefit from the school’s program.
Sexual Violence Definition • Sexual violence is a form of sexual harassment prohibited by Title IX. • Sexual violence refers to physical sexual acts perpetrated against a person’s will or where a person is incapable of giving consent due to the victim’s use of drugs or alcohol, or intellectual or other disability • May include rape, sexual assault, sexual battery, and sexual coercion
Scope of Title IX Coverage • Title IX protects students from sexual harassment in an institution’s education programs and activities, including: • All academic, educational, extracurricular, athletic, and other programs of the institution • On-campus, off-campus, in transit, sponsored at other locations, etc. • Third parties on campus (particularly visiting students) may be protected as well
Selected Title IX Obligations • If institution knows or reasonably should know about sexual harassment that creates a hostile environment, Title IX requires immediate action to eliminate the harassment, prevent its recurrence, and address its effects. • Train employees to report harassment to appropriate institutional officials • Train employees with authority to address harassment, or who are likely to witness it or receive reports, how to respond properly • OCR examples: “teachers, school law enforcement unit employees, school administrators, school counselors, general counsels, health personnel, and resident advisors.”
Selected Title IX Obligations • Investigate complaints adequately, reliably and impartially • Provide grievance procedures that promote prompt, equitable resolution of complaints • Undertake education and prevention efforts
Title IX/Police Investigation Issues • Police investigations are not determinative of whether sexual harassment/violence violates Title IX • Police investigations do not relieve institutions of Title IX duty to resolve sexual violence complaints promptly and equitably • Institutions cannot wait for the conclusion of a criminal investigation or criminal proceeding to begin their own Title IX investigation and, if needed, must take immediate steps to protect the student in the educational setting
Title IX Intake Issues • Employees likely to receive complaints initially (e.g., medical, counseling, public safety, coaches, residence life, student affairs, etc.) must: • Be trained to recognize reports of sexual harassment and sexual violence • Know where on campus (and off-campus) to direct complainants for further support, procedures, etc. • Understand limits on requests for confidentiality • Understand what “not to say” in intake discussion
Title IX/Interim Measures Issues • Consider whether interim measures are appropriate immediately upon receiving complaint • Examples include: • Separating the parties (changing academic schedules, housing) • Instructing the respondent not to have contact with the complainant or to go to areas where the complainant is expected to be present • Interim suspension: Justified if the respondent’s remaining part of the community appears reasonably to pose a risk of danger (e.g., stalking, further violence, retaliation); At public institutions, offer a pre-suspension hearing
Title IX/Confidentiality Issues • “If the complainant requests confidentiality or asks that the complaint not be pursued, the school should take all reasonable steps to investigate and respond to the complaint consistent with the request for confidentiality or request not to pursue an investigation.” • “If a complainant insists that his or her name or other identifiable information not be disclosed to the alleged perpetrator, the school should inform the complainant that its ability to respond may be limited.” April 4, 2011 Dear Colleague Letter
Title IX/Confidentiality Issues • “In some cases, such as those where the school is required to report the incident to local law enforcement or other officials, the school may not be able to maintain the complainant’s confidentiality.” • “The school should inform the complainant if it cannot ensure confidentiality.” • “Even if the school cannot take disciplinary action against the alleged harasser because the complainant insists on confidentiality, it should pursue other steps to limit the effects of the alleged harassment and prevent its recurrence.” • (e.g.: education and prevention programs)
Title IX/Confidentiality Issues • If complainant continues to insist on complete confidentiality, institution “should evaluate that request in the context of its responsibility to provide a safe and nondiscriminatory environment for all students.” • Institution may weigh confidentiality request against: • seriousness of the alleged harassment; • complainant’s age; • whether there have been other harassment complaints about the same individual; and • the alleged harasser’s potential right to review documents re allegations if contained in a FERPA “education record”
Requests for Confidentiality – Suggested Solutions (IF No Current/Future Threat) • Let student know about confidential campus resources • offer to walk there with the student or have staff come to your office to see the student • Be clear that institution wants to help and when student is ready for institution to act, to come back to talk 26
Requests for Confidentiality – Suggested Solutions (IF No Current/Future Threat) • Make sure your confidential campus resources are knowledgeable about your policies and procedures • Be certain you know and have defined in published policies who is and who is not “confidential” for state privilege and Clery Act purposes • Be certain your confidential resources are trained re Title IX, and support institutional processes • Document communications and resolution 27
Campus Sexual Violence Elimination Act (“Campus SaVE Act”) • Part of Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act (“VAWRA”) of 2013 • Intended to: amend the Higher Education Act “to improve education and prevention related to campus sexual violence, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking” • Violence Against Women Act (1994) comes to campus • Effective March, 2014
VAWA Definitions • “Domestic violence” means crime of violence committed by spouse, cohabitant, parent of victim’s child, or similarly situated person • as relationships/protections are defined under state domestic or family violence laws
VAWA Definitions “Dating violence” means violence committed by a person • Who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the victim • Where the existence of such relationship is determined based on consideration of: Length and type of relationship and Frequency of interaction between persons involved Train campus on state law definition of dating violence
VAWA Definitions • “Stalking” means engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to: • Fear for his or her safety or the safety of others; or • Suffer substantial emotional distress • Train campus on state law definition of stalking
New Policy Requirements • Each IHE receiving federal funding under HEA must develop and distribute in its Annual Security Report a statement of policy regarding • The institution’s programs to prevent domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking; and • the procedures that the institution will follow once an incident of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking has been reported
Advocacy Statements Policy statements must provide: • Notification about existing counseling, health, mental health, victim advocacy, legal assistance, and other services available to victims both on-campus and in the community
Confidentiality Statements • Clery Act “timely warnings” must “withhold the names of victims as confidential” • Must include statement of: • “Information about how the institution will protect the confidentiality of victims, including how publicly-available recordkeeping will be accomplished without the inclusion of identifying information about the victim, to the extent permissible by law.”
Procedural Statements Policy statements must cover: • Possible sanctions or protective measures that the institution may impose following the final determination of an institutional disciplinary procedure regarding rape, acquaintance rape, DV, DV, SA or stalking
Procedural Statements Policy statements must cover: • Procedures victims should follow if DV, DV, SA or stalking has occurred, including info about: • Importance of preserving evidence as may be necessary to proof of criminal DV, DV, SA or stalking, or in obtaining protective order • To whom offense should be reported
Procedural Statements Policy statements must cover: • Procedures victims should follow if DV, DV, SA or stalking has occurred, including info about: • the right of victims of such offenses to notify proper law enforcement authorities, including on-campus and local police; • the option to be assisted by campus authorities in notifying such authorities if the student or employee so chooses; and • the right of victims of such offenses to decline to notify such authorities;
Procedural Statements Policy statements must cover: • Procedures victims should follow if DV, DV, SA or stalking has occurred, including info about: • Where applicable, the rights of victims and the institution’s responsibilities regarding orders of protection, no contact orders, restraining orders, or similar lawful orders issued by a court
Procedural Statements Policy statements must cover: • Procedures for institutional disciplinary action in cases of an alleged incident of DV, DV, SA or stalking, which shall include a clear statement that such proceedings shall: • provide a prompt, fair and impartial investigation and resolution; • be conducted by officials who receive annual training on issues related to DV, DV, SA, and stalking and how to conduct an investigation and hearing process that “protects the safety of victims and promotes accountability”;
Procedural Statements • Must include statement of the standard of evidence that will be used in cases involving DV, DV, SA or stalking • Campus SaVE Act does not mandate particular (i.e., preponderance of evidence) standard • Office of Civil Rights Dear Colleague Letter requires, as matter of OCR enforcement policy, preponderance of evidence standard
Procedural Statements • Campus SaVE: both parties are entitled to same opportunities to have others present during disciplinary proceedings • Including opportunity to be accompanied to any related proceeding or proceeding by an advisor of their choice • Time will tell as to whether that could include legal counsel
Procedural Statements • Both parties must be simultaneously informed in writing of the outcome of any disciplinary proceeding that arises from allegation of DV, DV, SA or stalking • FERPA note: In cases that involve sexual harassment, but not sexual violence, complainant can only be informed of those sanctions directly related to complainant, such as an instruction to respondent not to have any contact with complainant
Procedural Statements Policy statements must cover: • Institution’s procedures for both parties to appeal the results of disciplinary proceeding • Notice of any change to the results before they become final • When such results become final
Procedural Statements Policies and procedures to ensure that student or employee who reports that he/she has been the victim of DV, DV, SA, or stalking: • shall receive information about options for, and available assistance in, changing academic, living, transportation, and working situations • if such assistance is requested by the student or employee and if such accommodations are reasonably available • Regardless of whether victim chooses to report to campus police or local law enforcement
Anti-Retaliation Provision No officer, employee, or agent of an IHE “shall retaliate, intimidate, threaten, coerce, or otherwise discriminate against any individual for exercising their rights or responsibilities under any provision of this subsection”
Educational Requirements Campus SaVE requires description of education programs to promote awareness of offenses of DV, DV, SA and stalking, which shall include: • primary prevention and awareness programs for all incoming students and new employees, which shall include: • statement that institution of prohibits offenses of DC, DV, SA and stalking; • definition of DV, DV, SA and stalking in applicable jurisdiction; • the definition of consent in reference to sexual activity in jurisdiction;
Educational Requirements Campus SaVE requires description of educational programs regarding: • Safe and positive options for bystander intervention; • Information on risk reduction to recognize warning signs of abusive behavior and how to avoid potential attacks; and • ongoing prevention and awareness campaigns for students and faculty
Clery Act Basic Requirements • Collect specified crime and fire statistics and create mandated daily logs, annual reports, etc. • Adopt and publish specified safety/security-related policy statements • Adopt timely warning, emergency notification and missing student policies and procedures
Clery “Campus Security Authorities” • Campus police/security department/access monitors • Individual or offices designated to receive crime reports • Officials with significant responsibility for student and campus activities, e.g.: • Resident assistants • Student housing, student life and athletics staff
Clery “Campus Security Authorities” • CSAs must: • “report allegations made in good faith to the reporting structure established by the institution.” • “A crime is reported when it is brought to the attention of a campus security authority or the local police by a victim, witness, other third party, or even the offender.” • IHE must disclose crime reports regardless of whether any of the individuals involved in either the crime itself, or in the reporting of the crime, are associated with the institution