1 / 26

Magnox Decommissioning Opitmisation Programme (MODP) Overview

Removal of Berkeley Boilers Paul Oswald (Magnox), Rachel O’Donnell (LLWR), Joe Robinson (Studsvik). Magnox Decommissioning Opitmisation Programme (MODP) Overview. Background. Each reactor had 8 boilers (heat exchangers) housed externally to the reactor buildings

finnea
Download Presentation

Magnox Decommissioning Opitmisation Programme (MODP) Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Removal of Berkeley Boilers Paul Oswald (Magnox), Rachel O’Donnell (LLWR), Joe Robinson (Studsvik) Magnox Decommissioning Opitmisation Programme (MODP) Overview

  2. Background • Each reactor had 8 boilers (heat exchangers) housed externally to the reactor buildings • Boilers de-lagged and disconnected during decommissioning preps • Currently stored horizontally around each reactor (15 in total) • One boiler sized reduced on site in the 1990’s

  3. Background • Each boiler is 21 meters long and 5 meters in diameter • Each weighs approx. 310 tonnes • 15 boilers originally planned to be left in situ until final site clearance 2074 • Very low levels of internal contamination present • Initiated graduate project to investigate options

  4. Why now? • Business case aligns with overall national Low Level Waste (LLW) strategy (published Summer 2010) • For LLW metals - BPEO is to treat/recycle • Early solutions found now, rather than at final site clearance • Provides base load for supply chain • Noticeable change to the site skyline • Remains LLW if stored to final site clearance on site, so why not do it now!

  5. Graduate Project • Graduate Project – to under take initial ground work • Five work streams with mentors Waste Size Reduction Transport Characterisation and historical data Business Case

  6. Project initiation and definition • Graduate Project – background work • Transportation feasibility studies completed (Studsvik & Energy Solutions) • Business case completed • Additional funding secured for Berkeley Site

  7. Project initiation and definition • Early collaboration with LLWR • Optioneering undertaken to determine Best Available Technique (BAT) • LLWR framework used to engage supply chain

  8. Programme • Contract award: 4thNovember 2011 • Inaugural meeting:16thNovember 2011 • Highways Agency – SpecialMovement Order approval: 12thJanuary 2012 • TFS Approval: 19thJanuary 2012 • Readiness review:28thFebruary 2012 • Lift 1stboiler: 1stMarch 2012 • Transport 1stboiler: 23rdMarch 2012 • Transport 5th boiler: 29thMarch 2012

  9. Commercial – utilising LLWR Waste Services Contract Magnox Waste Services Contract LLWR Metal Waste Services Framework Nuvia EnergySolutions Studsvik

  10. Project relationships Magnox LLWR Studsvik ALE Assystem COSTAIN Oceaneering Role: Engineering substantiation Role: Heavy-lift and transport contractor Role: Boiler preparations and on-site civil enabling works Role: Non-Destructive Examination

  11. Scope of works for Lot 1 - Five boilers • Stakeholder Engagement • Regulatory approvals • Enabling Works • Engineering • Substantiation • Site Preparation • Lifting & Site Transport • Off site Transport • Treatment • Secondary Waste • LLW – LLWR • C14 – Magnox Ltd. • Recycled steel – Swedish market

  12. Enabling works • Trans-frontier shipment application – approved • Special order – granted • Substantiation • Integral tasks that must be completed before lifting can commence

  13. Stakeholder Engagement • Early introduction to SSG • Early liaison with E.A. Site Inspector • Presentation to SSG giving detail following transport feasibility study • Attendance at various public events in and around Berkeley (Berkeley Christmas Fair, Business Forum breakfast) • Continuing liaison with E.A. – close involvement in the development of the BAT • Regular presentations giving updates for Site personnel • Fortnightly project update to key stakeholders across Magnox Ltd • Presentation to SSG by the supply chain • Planned flyer drops giving detail of dates and times for vehicle movements • Key stakeholder event recognising the first Boiler being removed from site

  14. Lifting and site transport • Jacking and skidding • Self propelled modular transport (SPMT)

  15. Transport to Sharpness Docks • Route survey undertaken as part of the transport study. • Telephone cables • Utilities • Street furniture • Bridges/culverts • Tree trimming • Road closures

  16. Shipping operations

  17. Studsvik Nuclear Site Deep sea Harbour Storage and processing area

  18. Temporary Storage

  19. Processing

  20. Secondary Waste Weight: ~ 310 tonnes Volume: ~ 600 m³

  21. Processing • Size reduction • Recovery of loose material • Decontamination of internal surfaces • Smelting • Casting of ingots for free release • Melting of metal ensures robust characterisation analysis • Representative sample “pucks” • Metal is restricted release

  22. Secondary Waste Management • Volume reduced waste consists of a concentrate including the radioactive nuclides to be returned • All secondary waste packages are analysed for radiological content • A comprehensive final report is generated during processing with radiological analysis data • Use of standard packages for return of secondary waste

  23. Where we are currently • Phase 1 site operations and transport successfully completed • 5 Boilers in Sweden • Size Reduction underway on first boiler

  24. Film The film may be viewed on the Mediasite

  25. Conclusions • Cross SLC’s working in partnership to deliver decommissioning solutions • Early and open engagement with supply chain to identify possible solutions • Effective team work from all players: Magnox, LLWR and Studsvik – focused on delivery • Clear demonstration of decommissioning in progress at Berkeley

  26. Questions

More Related