290 likes | 308 Views
Stay informed with the latest updates on Michigan Department of Education's School Report Card for 2005-2006. Learn about Achievement Status, State Accreditation, AYP, Measurement Tools, and more. Get insights into changes, growth, and performance indicators.
E N D
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education
Today We Will discuss… • What’s New for 2005 Report Card • Education YES! • Adequate Yearly Progress • Preview of 2006 Report Card • State Accreditation • Adequate Yearly Progress
Education YES!until 2005-06 Achievement Change Achievement Status Indicators
Education YES! • Achievement Status • Up to a three year Average • Weighted Index • Achievement Change • Improvement (or Decline) • Based on 100% by 2013-14 • Achievement Growth • Delayed until 2006-07 • Indicators of School Performance • “Investments” to Improve Achievement • Self-Assessments
Achievement Status and Change • Elementary • English Language Arts and Mathematics • Middle School and High School • Mathematics, English language arts, Science and Social Studies
Self Assessment Ratings • Systematically and Consistently Meets Criteria • Progressing Toward Criteria • Starting to Meet Criteria • Not Yet Meeting Criteria
What’s New for 2005 –Education YES! • Display of Evidence and Self-Ratings for the Indicators of School Performance • The Education YES! Composite Grade • Indicator score cannot improve the composite score and grade by more than one letter grade more than the achievement grade
What’s New for 2005 - AYP • Students Reported in an Ungraded Setting • Adjustment for Measurement Error to Improve AYP Reliability • Small Schools • Subgroup Size for AYP Determination • Nonstandard Accommodations – Count as “NOT TESTED”
2004-05 Report Card • Minimum n for district AYP based on 1% of enrollment if district or school enrollment is more than 3,000 • Nonstandard accommodations and unethical administrations will not count as participation for AYP
1% - 2% - I’m Confused • Special Education Alternate Assessment Flexibility Approved for 2005 • Applies to Students in Phase 2 – Functional Independence • Proposed Federal Rules Expected in the Fall • 1% Exception Still Needed for Phase 1 students – most significantly disabled
AYP ReliabilityMargin of Error • Sources of Error • Measurement Error - APPROVED • Would the student score the same if tested again? • Standard Error of Measurement • Sampling Error – NOT APPROVED • Does the sample of students tested reflect the whole school? • Standard Error of Proportion with Finite Sampling Error Correction
Provisionally Proficient Students - ELA • ELA Grade 4 • ELA Scale Score is at or above 508 and Reading Scale Score is at or above 478 and Writing Scale Score is at or above 475 • ELA Grade 7 • ELA Scale Score is at or above 499 and Reading Scale Score is at or above 466 and Writing Scale Score is at or above 480
Provisionally Proficient Students - Math • Grade 4 Math • Math Scale Score is above 510 and Math Scale Score is at or below 550 • Grade 8 Math • Math Scale Score is above 501 and Math Scale Score is at or below 559
Preview of 2005-06 AYP • 1st year of 3-8 assessment • AYP – Use all scores for a school • Composite Percent Proficient • Cannot ignore valid scores • Group size rule may be modified • Full Academic Year rule may be modified • New AYP objectives • An impact analysis will be needed • The new objectives will be based on only 9 years to 100% proficiency
State Accreditation Issues for 2006 • Student Achievement • Status – New “Cut Scores” Needed • Change – Can’t Compare Old and New Tests • Growth – Cannot measure until 2007 • Indicators of School Performance • Measure the School Improvement Framework
Possible Measurement Tools • School Report and Self-Assessment • Focus on Process • Teacher Survey • Focus on instruction and collaboration • School Leader Survey • Focus on Leadership
Possible Measurement Tools • “Hard” Data • Highly Qualified from Registry of Educational Personnel • Coordination With Other Processes • North Central • Other Potential Tools • Parent Survey • Student Survey
Questions • Do we need a parent survey? • Do we need a student survey? How does it differ by grade range? • Are we overlooking groups whose perspective is important? • When is the appropriate time to administer the data collection? • January-February?
Possible Policy Questions • Recognition of existing Processes • North Central • Fair accountability for non-Title I Schools • Role of AYP as a part of state accreditation
Original Indicator Revision Schedule • February 2005 • Presentation to State Board of Education • Winter-Spring 2005 • Development of Measurement Plan • Fall, 2005 • Field Testing • Fall 2005 • Data Collection on Revised Indicators • Winter 2006 • Report Cards Available to Start Appeals
Contact Information Paul Bielawski Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Michigan Department of Education PO Box 30008 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 335-5784 bielawp@michigan.gov