1 / 13

Class V Way Ahead

Class V Way Ahead. 25 Jan 05. Lt Col Simons TCJ5-SDE. Background. Previous Class V teaming efforts: Functional SMEs assembled for workshops Workshops conducted 2-5 March on Scott AFB and 20-23 April at Joint Munitions Command

gabe
Download Presentation

Class V Way Ahead

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Class V Way Ahead 25 Jan 05 Lt Col Simons TCJ5-SDE

  2. Background • Previous Class V teaming efforts: • Functional SMEs assembled for workshops • Workshops conducted 2-5 March on Scott AFB and 20-23 April at Joint Munitions Command • Developed As-Is and To-Be Class V distribution process architectures based on SCOR model • Recommendations from April 04 interview with MG McManus, Commander, Army Field Support Command • Development of initial 18 change proposals

  3. 3-5 Nov Workshop • Service/CENTCOM Representatives participated • Supply Chain Operational Reference (SCOR) Model briefed as tool to ID gaps • Distribution Process Gaps • 38 gaps identified • Narrowed to 12 • Then to 3 most significant gaps • Retrograde process selected as subject for CBAT 90 day effort • Scaleable to 90 day effort • Same process as deployment, only reverse • CBAT effort began 8 Nov • Effort re-scoped to entire end-to-end at Level 3 detail

  4. Methodology • Initially 1637 line activities (SCOR level 3/4/5 for all classes of supply) • 385 line activities when narrowed to Class V (SCOR level 3/4/5) • 41 line activities for level 3 detail analyzed for gaps • 15 gaps -- mission critical (potential mission failure ) • 3 gaps -- mission essential (increases mission effectiveness) • 7 gaps -- nice to have (increases mission efficiency) • Other 16 activities not identified as gaps • Results were distilled to 6 high-level gaps • Cross referenced to 18 recommendations from SME IPT

  5. CBAT Critical Gaps • Collaborative planning and execution of requirements for wholesale and retail movements • Collaboratively analyze distribution feasibility with automation • Collaborative munitions forecasting • Cross-leveling of theater munitions • Confirmation of munitions receipts within inventory management systems • Theater unit-level inventory visibility & automated expenditure reporting

  6. Process Recommendations • Proposal 1: Collaborate priorities supporting deployment and sustainment • Proposal 2: Deploy retrograde processing teams and equipment • Proposal 3: Collaborate munitions requirements during adaptive and crisis action planning • Proposal 4: Identify Ammunition by Lot Number • Proposal 5: Co-locate Item Managers and Transportation Specialists to collaboratively source requirements • Proposal 6: Establish end user receipt confirmation process • Proposal 7: Expedite retrograde by increasing trained inspectors • Proposal 8: Publish DPO "way ahead" • Indicates addressed by CBAT gap analysis

  7. Process Recommendations cont. • Proposal 9: Consolidate LTL shipments of AA&E • Proposal 10: Army re-emphasize logistics situation reporting • Proposal 11: Provide customer contact info to address RDD • Proposal 12: Cross level stocks • Proposal 13: Improve sustainment planning by increasing customer awareness of distribution capabilities • Proposal 14: Develop shipping container alternatives • Proposal 15: Streamline emergency response for shipments • Proposal 16: Establish a Joint Munitions Agency • Proposal 17: One agency provide munitions for deployment • Proposal 18: Visibility to leverage contracts across Services • Partially addressed by CBAT Gap analysis

  8. CBAT Critical Capability Gaps(Links to Original 18 Proposals) • Collaborative planning and execution of requirements for wholesale and retail movements (1,2,3,5,8,16,17,18) • Collaboratively analyze distribution feasibility with automation (1,2,3,5,9,11,13,16,17) • Collaborative munitions forecasting (11,16,17) • Cross-leveling of theater munitions (12) • Confirmation of munitions receipts within inventory management systems (6,8) • Theater unit-level inventory visibility & automated expenditure reporting (10,18)

  9. DOTMLPF Change Recommendation • Collaborate priorities supporting deployment and sustainment • Collaborate munitions requirements during adaptive and crisis action planning • Deploy retrograde processing teams and equipment

  10. AA&E Strat Plan • Training • Shipping Container Initiatives • Emergency Response

  11. DPO Way Ahead • Defense Distribution Roadmap (DDR)

  12. Vision • Synchronizing the Services/COCOMs processes • Peace and war—same process • Simple and reliable; effective and efficient • Customer focused—warfighter!

  13. Class V • Other discussion topics for AIP 9

More Related