170 likes | 475 Views
Ethiopia CAADP Implementation Status. Techane Adugna Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Addis Ababa, Ethiopia CAADP Africa Forum 2010 4-8 October 2010. Presentation Outline. CAADP Ethiopia implementation Harmonization of CAADP and RED&FS Linkage of CAADP and RED&FS
E N D
Ethiopia CAADPImplementation Status Techane Adugna Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Addis Ababa, Ethiopia CAADP Africa Forum 2010 4-8 October 2010
Presentation Outline CAADP Ethiopia implementation Harmonization of CAADP and RED&FS Linkage of CAADP and RED&FS Scope of the CAADP Ethiopia study Ethiopia CAADP Pillar Agricultural sector PIF formulation Next Steps Lessons learnt
1. CAADP Ethiopia implementation It is a “Government Agenda” CAADP officially endorsed by council of ministers MoARD selected as implementing institution National focal person appointed (March 2008) Country implementation action plan developed National steering committee formed (May 2008) CAADP launching Workshop (September 2008)
1. CAADP Ethiopia Implementation (cont’d) • National steering committee composed of representatives of • Government institutions • civil society organizations • private institutions and • representative of development partners
1. CAADP Ethiopia Implementation (cont’d) Consensus on to harmonize the CAADP and the (RED&FS) Sector Working Group agendas: create synergy and share resources & expertise Four consultants worked on CAADP report stock-taking and analytic work consultants submitted the study inception report (January 2009) Inception report reviewed by the major stakeholders and feedback was consolidated Consultants undertook three stage stocktaking, gap analysis and institutions and their capacities assessment
1. CAADP Ethiopia Implementation (cont’d) Consultants briefed the GoE senior management on the outcome and the progress of the CAADP Ethiopia study, Mid-term study report submitted (May 2009) Consultation workshop (June 2009) Comments and suggestions from consultation workshop provide to the consultants
1. CAADP Ethiopia Implementation (cont’d) Ethiopia CAADP study report finalized (July 2009) Roundtable and compact signing (August 2009) Comments and suggestion from round table consolidated and provided to Consultants (October 2009) Ethiopia CAADP study finalized The RED&FS SWG discussed on the way forward (September 2009) Agreement reached to develop the Policy & Investment Framework (PIF)
2. Harmonization of REDFS and CAADP • Consensus was reached to harmonization the CAADP and RED&FS agendas • Consequently the CAADP and RED&FS coordination is put under one secretariat hosted by the MoARD and supported by DPs
3. Linkage of CAADP and RED&FS CAADP – 4 pillars = RED&FS – 3 pillars Food Security NRM/SLM Agricultural growth 9
4. Scope of the CAADP Ethiopia Study • Stocktaking: review of existing policies, strategies, investment programmes • Identify the gaps in the ongoing policies, strategies and programmes and programmes to scale-up or new interventions and areas ofinvestment 3. Assessing existing agricultural and pastoral institutions and identify the necessary institutional strengthening and capacity building
6. Agriculture sector PIF Formulation September 2009 MoARD and DPs formed a PIF steering committee to over see the works of PIF preparation Three consultants (one international and 2 nationals recruited) After several consultation works with regions, CSO, DPs and senior Gov officials PIF draft ready by June National stakeholders’ consultation workshop on PIF held July 2010 PIF report finalized August 2010
6. PIF Formulation (cont’d) FAO HQ and PIF SC summarized PIF and prepared investment plan PIF/Investment plan along with proposal submitted to GAFSP secretariat for funding
7.Next Steps mobilize required internal and external resources to carry out the required investments to achieve country development plan (GTP) Business meeting planned to take place in Nov 2010 Continue aligning programs and projects being developed Strengthen partnership among stakeholders Capitalize on available knowledge
The Gov and DPs platform (RED&FS SWG) Strong engagement facilitated the smooth implementation of CAADP and post CAADP process Active Stakeholders participation in the process of CAADP & post CAADP was very useful Ownership among major stakeholders strengthened through involvement from the very beginning 8. Lessons learnt