370 likes | 682 Views
Navigation Evolution Update to the RNAV Taskforce. Daniel Salvano Director, Navigation Services. FAA Mission . Provide the safest, most efficient aerospace system in the world Navigation Services Goal
E N D
Navigation Evolution Update to the RNAV Taskforce Daniel Salvano Director, Navigation Services
FAA Mission • Provide the safest, most efficient aerospace system in the world Navigation Services Goal • To provide safe, cost effective navigation services to meet operational needs of the aviation customer
Radar Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) Systems Radar NAVAIDs Air/Ground Communications Airport Landing, Weather, Lighting Today’s ground based, human-centered Air Transportation Systemhas reached its technological and capacity limits
What Is “Performance-Based” Navigation? • An End-to-End Air Transportation System Based On Performance Standards Rather Than Specific Technologies Or Equipment • Area Navigation (RNAV) • Required Navigation Performance (RNP) • Recognizes The Ability Of Modern Aircraft To Operate Safely And Efficiently Using A Variety Of On-Board Systems and External Signals
OperationalBenefit NavigationServices Navigation Capability NavigationSystems Operational benefits hierarchy IMC Operations, Gate Management DME, VOR, ILS, WAAS, GPS, MALSR Departure, Enroute, Approach, Surface Category I/II/III, RNAV SIDS, RNAV STARS, Q Routes
Efficient, Flexible Routing Vector Vector - - Free Free Streamlined Streamlined Arrivals Arrivals Departures Departures All All - - Weather Weather Approaches Approaches Performance-Based Navigation • Complete Transition By 2025 • Consistent With ICAO Global Vision • Operational Capability Based On GPS And Augmentations • Enhance Safety, Capacity, Efficiency • Reduce Cost For Legacy Navigation Systems
Why do this? • Technology now exists to move towards performance based navigation • Future FAA budgets will remain constant and will require us to become more efficient • The existing navigation infrastructure is: • Aging and becoming more expensive • Incapable of meeting future requirements
Service Affordability • F&E and operations budget shortfalls • 15,000 facilities/$389M annual sustainment cost* -- fluctuates and grows yearly • Annual earmarks exceed 60% of total GBNA budget • Focused on hardware procurement • No clear service provision relationship in acquisition * Source: FY05 Actual Ops
Cat I ILS Lifecycle Costs (20 yr) Note: Visibility <3/4 mile, Does not include airport infrastructure costs
FAA FY05 O&M Costs Does not include land lease nor telecommunications costs
VOR Land Lease Cost • Average cost = $500/acre • Costs range from $120K/acre to $0/acre • FY07 DME Evaluation will investigate movement of FAA facilities to Government owned land and existing FAA non-navigation sites
Approach Procedures • Existing Procedures: • 2,883 GPS NPA (LNAV) • 1,044 LNAV/VNAV • 640 LPVs
WAAS Operational Implementation • Avionics • Garmin GNS-480/CNX-80, estimated 3100 units sold • Garmin 400/500 Upgrade – estimated 70,000 units installed • Garmin reports over 18,000 upgrades already on order • Avidyne, Chelton, CMC, Universal, and Thales expect to have units available in 2006/2007 Garmin GNS-480 Free Flight Systems Capstone Installation
Trajectory-Based Operations Performance-Based Operations and Services Precision Navigation Weather Integration Network-Centric Information Sharing Surveillance Services Equivalent Visual Operations Super Density Operations Layered, Adaptive Security The Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Plan Defines A System That Can Meet Demands For The 21st Century Capabilities
RNP/Roadmap • The RNAV/RNP roadmap v 2 was published this year • We are developing a navigation roadmap that enables implementation of RNAV, RNP and NextGen
Navigation Evolution Roadmap • Supports the RNAV/RNP Roadmap • Informal Outreach since March 2005 • Included RAA, ATA, AOPA, and AVS SME, international … • Formal Outreach • Performance Based Aviation Rulemaking Committee (PARC) • DOD – Policy Board on Federal Aviation (PBFA) • AOPA • ATA • RTCA • ATMAC Requirements and Planning Working Group • Public Outreach Meeting July 25-26, 2006 • Roadmap released to Industry via PARC on Nov. 1st, 2006 • Target date for comments Dec 22, 2006
Navigation Evolution Roadmap Business Plan 3-5 year window Financial Plan 2 year window Roadmap Layout 2007-2025
Navigation Roadmap Assumptions • The FAA requires an aggressive transition to performance-based service • Decisions need to be made with the aviation community. • define standard services provided by FAA • define public use special services • define non-public services provided by the airport operator/user • FAA will provide NAS-wide performance-based service • RNAV/RNP (primarily GNSS) • LPV at all runway ends • LPV-200 where needed • Determination if CAT II minima is the appropriate requirement at specific airports • CAT III service requirements become responsibility of the airport operator/user • A Policy will exist for mitigating a loss of GNSS • Mitigation strategy supports RNAV/RNP • FAA will provide Cat I ILS as backup at OEP airports (~55 airports) • Fleet Equipage • Today = Mixed Fleet – GNSS, D/D and D/D/I • Future = Fleet equipped with GNSS • Decision/specification of “operational” mitigation • GPS modernization and sustainment is crucial
Navigation Roadmap 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 En Route & Terminal 1 1a VOR 2 DME Galileo GPS (L5) GPS III GNSS WAAS NPA 1a 1 VOR GPS III Galileo GPS (L5) GNSS CAT I or Equivalent 3b 3 3a ILS 3 SBAS/LPV 3a 3 GBAS/GLS PRECISION APPROACH (PA) CAT II/III 4 4a ILS 4a 4 GBAS/GLS 4a 4 ABAS
Navigation Roadmap Decisions 1 1a • 2007 - VOR decision for drawdown based on GNSS • 2015 - VOR decision on remaining drawdown • 2007 - Develop rightsizing DME Requirements, e.g., service volume, architecture, pathway • 2008 - Decision on next generation Cat I landing system • 2012 - Begin ILS Cat I drawdown - limited backup at OEP airports • 202X - Decision on CAT I ILS drawdown • 2008 - Decision on next generation Cat II/III service mandate, pending feasibility & schedule of potential ABAS/GBAS solutions and risk mitigation strategies • 2012 Determination if CAT II minima is the appropriate requirement at specific airports 2 3 3a 3b 4 4a
Navigation Evolution Customer Council (NECC) • Council made up of Government and Industry members • Created by Director of Navigation Services to: • Implement the Navigation Evolution Roadmap to include review of business and financial plans • Adjudication of Navigation Evolution Roadmap Comments • Develop updates for future versions of the Roadmap • Assure viability of the implementation process • Liaison between policy-makers and the aviation community • Guarantee concerns are heard and addressed
Conclusion • Importance of Navigation Services role in setting the stage for performance-based system • NAV is setting the stage for communications and surveillance • Work collaboratively to define and achieve NextGen • Navigation Services is changing • Collaboration with user community paramount to a successful transition • Maximize service delivery, reduce costs and improve or maintain safety • Collaboration is paramount
Cat II ILS Lifecycle Costs (20 yr) Note: Visibility <3/4 mile, Does not include airport infrastructure costs
Cat III ILS Lifecycle Costs (20 yr) Note: Visibility <3/4 mile, Does not include airport infrastructure costs
This is not a paper study • 2005 Facilities Divested • 177 total divested • ~$2.9M cost avoidance • 2006 Facilities Divested • 227 total divested (NDB, VOR, etc) • ~$1.5M cost avoidance • 2007 • Goal is to divest a minimum of 100 navaids
Collaboration is Key • Direct Interface with Users • Why? - Consensus Building, Collaboration, Restoring Trust • Direct Interface with JPDO, NSSO, PBFA, … • Steering toward the NGATS Vision together • Direct Input to Enterprise Architecture • Through Nav Chief, Systems Engineer • Ensure one FAA message conveyed to industry – building trust • Direct Interaction across FAA lines of business • It’s more than ATO • AVS owns the rules and regulations • It’s about communication - leading the collaborative evolution to a global, performance based system
Predicted Availability Gains WAAS Commissioning - 2003 Full Capability - 2008 • Availability over the majority of CONUS improves from 99.5% to 99.9% • Alaskan availability improves from less than 75% to 99 – 99.9% • Significant availability gains in northeast and southern California, Texas, and Florida
PanAmSat 133°W Telesat 107°W New GEO Satellite Locations
U.S. Controlled Airspace Int’l Cooperation… A Necessity • U.S. Assigned Airspace Equals 77 Million Square Kilometers