190 likes | 297 Views
TE-MPE-EM Costing. Betty Magnin. Costing. History Operational budgets Invoicing Cost balancing over fiscal year. Budgetary situation (2010). PCB Manufacturing. Design office. Subcontracting. Assembly workshop. 2010 pricing model.
E N D
TE-MPE-EMCosting Betty Magnin
Costing History Operational budgets Invoicing Costbalancing over fiscal year
Budgetary situation (2010) PCB Manufacturing Design office Subcontracting Assembly workshop
2010 pricing model • Operational budget for non invoiceableexpenses • Librarie * • Outsourcing management and follow-up * • Maintenance of workshop equipments • Investmentstrategy • Planifiedexpenses for the replacement of existingequipement (10% of the installed value)* • Expenses for new processes to becharged to the product *4 dedicated budget codes
Operational budget • Libraries (89511) • Altium 1 FSU * • (waspreviouslyallocated for PCAD sinceyears) • 30k/yearpaid by ELEC • Cadence 1 FSU * • Until 2011, wasdone by 2 and then 1 staff, retired 06/2011 * 1 FSU = 100k/year
Operational budget • Outsourcing management (89512) • Before 2009, required 2 FSU • 2010, reduced to 1 FSU • 2011, change S107 to S144, profile reviewedfrom administrative to technician • 2012, increased to 2 FSU • 2013 : impact of LS1 ? • FSU: possible to adaptcapacity to load (3 monthsadvice)
Investment in infrastructure • PCB workshop, 1770k for the last 6 years • Machines for large MPDG 600k • Laser Direct Imaging 700k • Flying probe electricaltester 30k • AOI 380k • Planning tool 60k • Forecast: • Migration into B107 • Laser
Investment in infrastructure • Assemblyworkshop: 650k for the last 6 years • Screen printing of solder paste 30k • Automatic placement 270k • Inspection 30k • Cleaning 50k • Press-fit inserter 30k • BGA repair 110k • Replacement of the reflowoven 200k • Pastedepositionby jet printing 200k • CAD-CAM software (Aegis) 30k
Investment in infrastructure • Repair workshop (B867) • Humidity and temperature control • Copy of the repair area in the assembly workshop • Specific RP constraints (fume extraction, ..)
Invoicing model • 1 job = 1 invoice (JMT or RFF) • Individual if direct demands (PCB or Assembly) • Global if Design + PCB + Components + Mechanics + Assembly • No «overhead» • Atcompletion of the job • Expenses and invoicingthrough the transitory budget codes of the section.
Calculationmethods • Design office • FSU: 1 design = 1 job (JMT) • Estimation based on the technicalparameters of the layout • Invoiced on the actualelapsed time • Invoiced to the user on the basis of • The elapsed time invoiced by FSU • Effective hourly rate 72.- CHF
Calculationmethods • Standard PCB at CERN (done by FSU Team) • Invoiced on the basis of • Technical parameters of the product • Hourlycost of FSU • Consumable costs • MPGD (done by staff) • Invoiced on the basis of • Technical parameters of the product • Elapsed time • Consumable costs
Calculationmethods • Assembly at CERN • Invoiced on the basis of • Elapsed time for manualwork (prototypes, rework and repair) • Technical parameters of the product for machine placement • Consumable costs
Calculationmethods • Components • Invoiced on the basis of the real cost • Mechanical parts • Invoiced on the basis of the real cost • Outsourcedassembly • Invoiced on the basis of the real cost
Costfollow-up Based on payment, according to CET data. Each area of the section has a dedicatedtransitory code Design Office 89509
Costfollow-up PCB Workshop 89569
Costfollow-up Assembly Workshop 89529
Costfollow-up Subcontracting and components 89519