1 / 6

Faculty Evaluation Using an Electronic Reporting System and a Senior Faculty Committee

D. Paul Lunn, CSU AAVC-Atlanta 2011. Faculty Evaluation Using an Electronic Reporting System and a Senior Faculty Committee . College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. Department of Clinical Sciences. 86 faculty members 64 tenure track faculty

ipo
Download Presentation

Faculty Evaluation Using an Electronic Reporting System and a Senior Faculty Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. D. Paul Lunn, CSU AAVC-Atlanta 2011 Faculty Evaluation Using an Electronic Reporting System and a Senior Faculty Committee

  2. College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Department of Clinical Sciences • 86 faculty members • 64 tenure track faculty • 22 special appointment faculty • 5 non-DVMs • 71 faculty have formal VTH assignments • Home to numerous centers • Animal Cancer Center • Orthopedic Research Center • Animal Population Health Institute • Argus Institute for Veterinary Communication

  3. Evaluation process • Proscribed in Department Code • Annual written evaluation • Information collated in December • Faculty Evaluation Committee review - January • Final dept. hd. Review - February (3-4 days) • Individual meetings (3-6 weeks)

  4. Inputs • Faculty Activity Summary (FAS) • web-based, self-populating fields, faculty input • Teaching evaluations • predominantly web-based didactic & clinical • Center Head evaluations • written • VTH Director evaluation • web-based • Letters, flowers, napkins etc.

  5. Faculty Evaluation Committee • 5 tenured Full Professors & 3 Associate Professors • Each assigned 10 files • Materials collated and provided as hard-copy • Draft report and discuss selected cases as a group • Assign performance grades & finalize

  6. The Faculty experience… • Must solicit student and peer-reviews year round • Circa 2000, first web-based FAS • No self-population • Algorithms calculate workload performance • Viewed with suspicion at best • New FAS used in 2008, ‘09, ’10 • No algorithms, solely reporting • Teaching self-populates for instructor of record • Research self-populates for external funding agencies • Accepted, irritating at worst, takes 1-2 days to fill out • Departmental FAS guide is essential

More Related