1 / 18

Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]. Measures Evaluated. Reading/ELA Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Reading/ELA Math

irene-dalton
Download Presentation

Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11[Our School District]

  2. Measures Evaluated • Reading/ELA • Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA • Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Reading/ELA • Math • Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Math • Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Math • Other • Attendance Rate • For elementary and middle school campuses • Districts not offering 12th grade • Graduation Rate • For high school campuses • Districts offering 12th grade

  3. Standards for Performance 100 % of students must pass in 2014 93 87 92 80 83 Reading 73 75 Math 67 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 % Proficient

  4. Student Groups Evaluated * Provided that these groups meet the Minimum Size Requirement. < 50 = Not Evaluated | > 200 = Always Evaluated | 50-200 = Evaluated if equal to at least 10% of the All Student group

  5. AYP Status Labels • Met AYP • Missed AYP – (Reason) Reasons include: • Math (Proficiency and/or Participation) • Reading (Proficiency and/or Participation) • Attendance Rate • Graduation Rate

  6. Accessing the AYP Report 1 http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/ [Insert District Website Link] Campus Libraries or Offices 2 3

  7. 2011 AYP Report OverviewPage One Performance: Reading/ELA – 80% Proficient • Reading Performance, 2010-2011 • Used to demonstrate proficiency. • Reading Performance, 2009-2010 • Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor).

  8. 2011 AYP Report OverviewPage Two Performance: Mathematics – 75% Proficient • Math Performance, 2010-2011 • Used to demonstrate proficiency. • Math Performance, 2009-2010 • Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor).

  9. 2011 AYP Report OverviewPage Three Participation: Reading/ELA & Mathematics – 95% Participation • Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2010-2011 • Used to demonstrate participation. • Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2009-2010 • Used to calculate 2 year average, if needed.

  10. 2011 AYP Report OverviewPage Four Graduation Rate (75%) or Attendance Rate (90%) • Graduation or Attendance Rate, 2010-2011 • Used to calculate whether or not the campus or district met the target rate. • Graduation or Attendance Rate, 2009-2010 • Used to demonstrate improvement. • 5 Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate, 2010-2011 • Class of 2009

  11. 2011 AYP Report OverviewPage Five AYP Explanation Table • Summarizes the results of the AYP report

  12. 2011 AYP Status[Our School District]

  13. 2011 AYP Performance Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10)

  14. 2011 AYP Performance Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10)

  15. 2011 AYP Participation Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10)

  16. 2011 AYP Participation Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10)

  17. 2011 AYP Graduation RateFor High Schools and Districts with a 12th Grade

  18. 2011 AYP Attendance RateFor Elementary & Middle Schools and Districts Not Offering 12th Grade

More Related