1 / 77

Sunray Independent School District

Sunray Independent School District. 2009 AEIS Performance Report. District and Campus Ratings. District Acceptable High School Recognized Middle School Acceptable Elementary Recognized. 2008/2009 Comparison of TAKS Results Subgroups. 2008/2009 Comparison TAKS Results Subgroups.

penha
Download Presentation

Sunray Independent School District

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sunray Independent School District 2009 AEIS Performance Report

  2. District and Campus Ratings District Acceptable High School Recognized Middle School Acceptable Elementary Recognized

  3. 2008/2009 Comparison of TAKS Results Subgroups

  4. 2008/2009 Comparison TAKS Results Subgroups

  5. 2009 TAKS Results Compared to State & Region Results

  6. 3rd Grade

  7. 4th Grade Longitudinal

  8. 5th Grade Longitudinal

  9. 6th Grade Longitudinal

  10. 7th Grade Longitudinal

  11. 8th Grade Longitudinal

  12. 9th Grade Longitudinal

  13. 10th Grade Longitudinal

  14. 11th Grade Longitudinal

  15. 2009 State Testing Participation

  16. Texas Projection Measure • Texas Projection Measure (TPM), a growth measure that will be used by Texas to determine whether students are meeting annual performance goals. • Growth measures track individual student achievement on state tests from one year to the next, giving schools credit for student improvement over time. The Texas Education Agency developed the TPM as a measure for use in its federal and state accountability systems. • Once the TPM becomes available for use in determining state and federal accountability ratings, districts and schools will then have an opportunity to receive credit for students who did not meet passing standards on state tests, but who demonstrate they are projected to pass in a subsequent year.

  17. 2009 TPM Compared to State & Region Results

  18. Criteria for meeting AYP: 1. AYP performance requirements are met if the percent Met Standard for all students and each student group summed across grades 3-8 and 10 in reading/language arts and mathematics meets or exceeds AYP standard. • The AYP standards for 2007-2008 are 67% for reading/ELA and 58% for Math. • The AYP standards gradually increase. • By 2013-2014, the standards are 100 percent for both reading/language arts and mathematics.

  19. 2. AYP participation requires 95 percent of all students and each student group to be tested to meet participation requirements, calculated separately for reading & math. 3. Other AYP requirements must be met for all students: 70% graduation rates for high schools and 90% attendance rates for middle and elementary schools.

  20. District & Campus AYP • Meets AYP and Participation

  21. TELPAS – At Least One Proficiency Level Increase in English Reading • 3rd -5th 8/24 33.3% • 6th-8th 3/8 37.5% • 9-11th 2/11* 18.1% (*5 beginner students moved in)

  22. TELPAS - % LEP with Advanced /Advanced High Rating in English Reading • 3rd-5th 33.3% • 6th-8th 0% • 9-12th 27.2% Advanced –High • 3rd-5th 25% • 6th-8th 87.5% • 9-12th 41.1% Advanced

  23. ESL Students Exited from Program Grades 3 - 5 5 students Grades 6 - 8 1 students Grades 9 -11 3 students

  24. Attendance Rates 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-0606-07 07-08 • State 95.6 95.7 95.7 95.5 95.5 95.5 • Region 16 95.6 95.8 95.7 95.6 95.7 95.5 • Sunray 96.8 97.3 96.7 96.9 96.3 96.2

  25. 7th and 8th Drop-out Rate '07-08 '06-07 State 0.3 0.2 Region16 0.2 0.2 Sunray 0 0

  26. Grades 7-12 Drop-out Rate '07-08 '06-07 State 2.2 2.7 Region16 1.8 1.7 Sunray .7 1.4

  27. Completion Rate

  28. % in Advanced Courses • 2005 2006 2007 2008 • State 20.5 21.0 22.1 23.1 • Region16 17.7 17.7 18.3 18.8 • Sunray 23.2 24.1 14.7 14.7

  29. RHSP/DAP Graduates • 2008 • State 81.4 • ESC 16 79.3 • Sunray 94.6 • 2007 • State 77.9 • ESC 16 74.7 • Sunray 87.5

  30. TSI – Higher Education Readiness Component 2009 • English • State 63 • ESC 16 58 • Sunray 62 • Math • State 62 • ESC 16 59 • Sunray 67

  31. SAT/ACT TEST DATA

  32. Violence and Criminal Incident Report • Sunray ISD did not have any activity or actions that would be deemed violent or criminal in nature .

  33. 2007 Graduates Attending Higher Education in Fall 2007 • Total Graduates 30 • Amarillo College 7 • West Texas A&M 5 • Other 4 year Inst. 3 • Other 2 year Inst. 2 • Not trackable 3 • Not found 10 • Total Known Attending 17

  34. District Gold Acknowledgements • Attendance 2007-2008 • College-Ready Graduates – 2008 • Recommended High School Program -2008 • Texas Success Initiative – ELA/Mathematics

  35. Sunray Elementary AEIS 2009

  36. SES TAKS Data from AEIS Grade 3

  37. Comments for Previous Slide • Reading stayed the same and a slight increase in the following sub-categories: Hispanic and Economic Disadvantage. • Math had an increase overall and a substantial increase in the following sub-categories: Hispanic, LEP, and the Economic Disadvantage. However the White sub-category had a significant decrease.

  38. SES TAKS Data from AEIS Grade 4 .

  39. SES TAKS Data from AEIS Grade 4

  40. Comments for Previous Slides • Reading and Math we had significant drops overall and the following sub-categories: Hispanic, LEP, and Economic Disadvantage. • Writing had a slight drop overall and in the sub-category of Economic Disadvantage. Had a significant drop in the following sub-categories: Hispanic and LEP.

  41. SES Attendance Data from AEIS Summary: Attendance slightly decreased overall for the campus but it did increase in the following sub-categories of Hispanic. LEP, and Economic Disadvantage. Attendance decreased for the following sub-categories of White and Sp Ed.

  42. Strategies for Attendance Improvement • Attendance Incentive Program • CAT Monitoring • Parent Notification • Saturday School and Summer School

  43. Strategies for TAKS Improvement • Use of Released Tests • Practice testing on computerized assessment to diagnosis during the school year • Use of TAKS Practice Materials • Reading Specialist and Intensive Instruction • Accelerated Reading Instruction (before & after school) • Accelerated Math Instruction (before & after school)

  44. Continuation from Previous Page • Study Island • My Reading Coach • I-Station • Symphony Math • CraftPlus Writing Program • Region 4 Materials Reading and Math

  45. SUNRAY MIDDLE SCHOOL 2008-2009 AEIS information

  46. SMS TAKS Data from AEIS Grade 5 Grade 5 Summary: Reading scores decreased in all groups this year. Math scores were primarily up and Science scores were primarily down compared to previous years. We will continue to work on all areas. We will be working with all groups to keep those scores going up.

  47. SMS TAKS Data from AEIS Grade 6 Grade 6 Summary: Reading and Math scores went up across the board, while the state averages went down.

  48. SMS TAKS Data from AEIS Grade 7 Grade 7 Summary: The biggest area that we need work in continues to be Math. We must continue to build the Math skills needed.

  49. SMS TAKS Data from AEIS Grade 8 Grade 8 Summary: Reading was right at state average and down a little from the year before. We stayed about where we were in Math with one group going up and two going down. We also jumped a little in Social Studies with one group going up and two going down. Science represents a significant need as our average and all groups but one were down.

  50. SMS Attendance Data from AEIS We would like for these to increase each year. These are a little higher from previous years. Received Gold Performance for Attendance.

More Related