1 / 7

HA SE Interlock ‘04: SWOT Strengths

This document provides a SWOT analysis for HA.SE.Interlock.‘04, highlighting its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. It also offers recommendations to address key areas of improvement and maximize market potential.

janehayes
Download Presentation

HA SE Interlock ‘04: SWOT Strengths

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HA SE Interlock ‘04: SWOT Strengths • Broadest platform & storage device support • Single point of mgmt across platforms • Viewed as a market leader by customers • Architecture flexibility (LAN, MAN, WAN) • Only vendor with workload management • Leading capabilities for >2 node clusters • Configuration flexibility (N:1, N+1, etc.) • Integration with VRTS and 3rd party s/w stacks • HCL Best of Breed

  2. HA SE Interlock ‘04: SWOT Weaknesses • Windows: Release timing, ease-of-use, automated-install, agent support, & Exchange • Confusion around availability of agents and certifications for App & DB tiers • Most customers still on 2-nodes • Competitive pricing for 2-node clusters (particularly on Windows and Linux) • Lack of references for new platforms / apps • Array support for non-Solaris platforms (+ iSCSI) • TTM / Nimbleness / Mrkt Follower • Release / Timing for non-Solaris platform (Q/A is weak) • Opportunity for large clusters on Windows is weaker • Qualification coverage (HCL supportability) for non-Solaris OS • Windows Install (defaults) • Integration (checkpoint mounting) • Documentation / Release Notes for certain stack (RAC) • Windows Feature Parity & Release Timing • 64 bit (Intel / AMD)

  3. HA SE Interlock ‘04: SWOT Opportunities • Windows, Linux, & AIX (new & Solaris migrations) • Lead in end-to-end solutions (out of the box agents and marketing for all Apps, DBMS, & Replication) • Lead in virtual machine / partition support • Deeper/broader IBM/IGS field engagement • DR Bundles (Exchange DR, Unix DR) • Leverage CCA value prop as differentiator • New capabilities (AAV, FF, connection failover) • PM adds: DB2?, NGC as game-changer? • Integration with VRTS products • New Capabilities: H2A…levelling the playing field • Field Engagement with HP Field Services • Strategy towards SME Market (price, support) • Inserting products into MSFT Training Centers • DB2 (Replacement for Informix) • M&A: Qlusters • Give SE’s exposure to new R&D (skunkworks) efforts

  4. HA SE Interlock ‘04: SWOT Threats • HW/SW Vendors • Ourselves • Sun Cluster 3.1 update 3 closes feature gap • Dependence on Oracle (pushing CRS hard) • MSCS: Ease-of-use, install, GUI, O/S bundling • RedHat Cluster Suite • EMC/Legato LAAM w/Replistor (seeing more often) • Qlusters fast-failover traction for FS custom apps • Hardware / OS bundling

  5. HA SE Interlock ‘04:Consolidated SWOT

  6. SE Interlock:Top 10 List of Areas to Address • Prioritize better platform support over more new features • Simplified pricing / licensing model (move to per CPU across the board) • VCS “lite” packaging proposal to target 2-node market (particularly Windows) • Integration with other VERITAS products (SF Checkpoints, NBU, OpForce, i3) • Consolidated roadmap to further differentiate core VCS (CCA, AAV, H2A, etc.) • Windows roadmap (ease-of-use, install, GUI, common CLI, release availability) • DR Bundle plan (Exchange DR, Unix DR) • App / DB / Replication agents (availability, consistency, marketing, certification) • References for non-Solaris platforms, apps, and databases • Better marketing collateral on VNET; fix AskPM; more consistent HCLs

  7. Open Questions • Create 2 and 4 node packages? • Cannot scale beyond licensed node count without adding upgraded license • SGWM disabled • Significantly cheaper than current product • Bundle GCO in base product license? • Even on 2/4 node products? • Make CCA available to any customer running multiple clusters? • Create DR bundles around certain apps at low price point? • Uses low cost node restricted licenses • Solution/”red book” docs • Modify agent packaging/pricing? • Free? • Enterprise packages/bundles?

More Related