1 / 22

CSAC Institute: Realignment Workshop Social Services June 3-4, 2010

CSAC Institute: Realignment Workshop Social Services June 3-4, 2010. Graham Knaus, M.P.A., Director Administrative Services Placer County Health & Human Services. What We Will Discuss. What Social Services Programs Were Realigned?. How Did County Sharing Ratios Change?.

jhammons
Download Presentation

CSAC Institute: Realignment Workshop Social Services June 3-4, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CSAC Institute: Realignment WorkshopSocial ServicesJune 3-4, 2010 Graham Knaus, M.P.A., Director Administrative Services Placer County Health & Human Services

  2. What We Will Discuss

  3. What Social Services Programs Were Realigned?

  4. How Did County Sharing Ratios Change?

  5. Purpose For Social Services

  6. How is Realignment Funded?

  7. County Approaches to Realignment

  8. Realignment as Fund Source for MOE’s • Maintenance of effort for mandated social services programs • County GF reflective of priorities and perception of sufficient realignment funding • Funding changes driven by population and caseload growth • Placer County example • Huge population growth and caseload demands since Realignment • Insufficient Realignment funding to cover mandated program costs

  9. Realignment Base Funding

  10. Realignment Caseload Growth Funding

  11. Caseload Growth Issues • CalWORKs Caseload Growth Exception • County share decreased (11% to 5%) • Increased caseload = Decreased caseload growth • Foster Care/Group Home Rate Increase • 32% Rate increase retro to December 2009 • Higher rate = higher caseload growth • IHSS as Caseload Growth Driver • Significant increased costs translate to significant caseload growth over time

  12. Realignment General Growth Funding

  13. Realignment Challenges

  14. Realignment Fund Transfers

  15. Legislative Action • Changes to base funding and distribution • 1992-93 Restoration • AB1716 (2003) Restoration • CWS/Foster Care/Adoptions • Increased program requirements • IHSS • Expanded eligibility, collective bargaining, and Personal Care Services Program (PCSP) • CalWORKs • Human Services Funding Deficit • Funding shortfall leads to encroachment

  16. Has Realignment Workedfor Social Services?

  17. Funding Implications

  18. Funding Implications continued

  19. Are We Out of the Woods Yet?

  20. 2010-11 May Revision

  21. 2010-11 May Revision – How Funded?

  22. Questions

More Related