1 / 12

Preliminary thermo-mechanical analysis of the LH antenna front

Preliminary thermo-mechanical analysis of the LH antenna front. Laurent Marfisi and Marc Goniche CEA. IRFM. F-13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance. France HCD08-03-01 EFDA Task Meeting in Frascati. 31 March-1 April 2009. LH PAM Antenna dimensions. Taken from DDD2001 (Ph.Bibet & F.Mirizzi) ‏

julie
Download Presentation

Preliminary thermo-mechanical analysis of the LH antenna front

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Preliminary thermo-mechanical analysis of the LH antenna front Laurent Marfisi and Marc Goniche CEA. IRFM. F-13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance. France HCD08-03-01 EFDA Task Meeting in Frascati. 31 March-1 April 2009

  2. LH PAM Antenna dimensions • Taken from DDD2001 (Ph.Bibet & F.Mirizzi)‏ • Wall thickness : e= 13.25mm • Passive WG length : L=15mm • Cooling channel : F=8mm • Distance between cooling channels in the structure: 62.5 mm

  3. Heat Fluxes • Nuclear volume heat source 5MW/m3 (pessimistic ICRH antenna 3MW/m3). e-fold decay lQ= (pessimisticlQ ~0.10 m from ref.2) • Plasma Radiation : 0.15 MW/m2(see next)on the whole surface facing the plasma (pessimistic=> shadowing effect) • Fast ion Flux from plasma : 0.5MW/m2 (pessimistic, see ref.3) • RF losses : 13 kW/m2 for copper, 28 kW/m2 for Beryllium Cooling water (ITER specifications): Tin=10015°C.Tout<148°C Berylllium (ITER specifications): Tmax<385°C [2] NUCLEAR ANALYSIS REPORT (NAR). G 73 DDD 2 W 0.2. p19-20 & 24 [3] dB/B=0.3% (Magnetic inserts): 0.1MW/m2. (Kramer et al. IAEA2008)

  4. Radiation flux Radiated flux from the plasma (scenario 5): - 70MW/683m2=0.10MW/m2 - Pa+Pinj=175MW Prad/Ptot=0.7 => Prad=122.5MW Prad.vessel/Prad.divertor=0.3=> Prad.vessel=37MW => 37/683=0.05MW/m2) : 0.15 MW/m2 is an upper bound

  5. Model of the antenna front

  6. Extracted power per antenna front unit (L=1.9m) 35.4kW &Tmax=148°C  V=5.8m/s

  7. Temperature mapping Twater=125°C  Tmax=325°C Twater=148°C Tmax=350°C (with V=5.8m/s)

  8. Temperature mapping Shorter Beryllium part (Twater=148°C, V=5.8m/s) Tmax=334°C

  9. Temperature mapping Fions=0.3MW/m2 (instead of 0.5) Frad=0.15MW/m2 on reduced length (15mm instead of 18mm) (Twater=148°C, V=4m/s) Tmax=312°C

  10. Stress mapping Fions=0.5MW/m2 Frad=0.15MW/m2 (Twater=148°C, V=5.8m/s) Ymax=124MPa

  11. Stress mapping (zoom of the HIP joint, fine mesh) • High stress zone is very small and will be deformed plastically •  Stress field is smoothed • Ymax ~ 80MPa ( < Stress limit of the joint) • To be checked with a non-linear model

  12. Future work (for next working meeting) • Optimize with new geometry (N//0, bpassive/bactive) • Non-linear calculation of the stress • 3D modelling with full Be waveguides

More Related