1 / 8

STARDUST Project CRITICAL EVENTS READINESS REVIEW COMET P/WILD 2 ENCOUNTER READINESS PREPARATION

STARDUST Project CRITICAL EVENTS READINESS REVIEW COMET P/WILD 2 ENCOUNTER READINESS PREPARATION T. Duxbury. JPL: 303-411 AM / 301-427 PM LMA: MSA +1 818 354-1275 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM PST 20 Nov 2003. Total Workforce. Operations, Science, E/PO and Management at JPL and LMA.

kconner
Download Presentation

STARDUST Project CRITICAL EVENTS READINESS REVIEW COMET P/WILD 2 ENCOUNTER READINESS PREPARATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. STARDUST Project CRITICAL EVENTS READINESS REVIEW COMET P/WILD 2 ENCOUNTER READINESS PREPARATION T. Duxbury JPL: 303-411 AM / 301-427 PM LMA: MSA +1 818 354-1275 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM PST 20 Nov 2003 CERR - Duxbury

  2. Total Workforce Operations, Science, E/PO and Management at JPL and LMA CERR - Duxbury

  3. SCOPE OF READINESS PREPARATION • Used the Flyby of Main Belt Asteroid Annefrank to Test Wild 2 Approach Operations, Timelines, Interfaces and Encounter Sequence • DRR and CERR Held before Event • Wild 2 E-3d to E+1d Timeline • Approach Geometry Significantly More Severe than Wild 2Approach • Annefrank 30 deg from Sun, Required Large Attitude Turns and Performed on Batteries with Flyby Speed 7.4 km vrs 6.1 km/s at Wild 2 • Annefrank Too Dim to See Before Flyby • All Operations Performed Within Timelines • All Interfaces, Peer Reviews, Command Products Implemented/Validated • Survived Loss of 1 + 1/2 DSN Passes - Forced Quick Turn Around of Sequences • Radio/Optical Nav Performed w/ Encounter Annefrank/Star Images • Encounter Sequence Completely Successful • Collector Deployed, CIDA and DFMI on and Nucleus Tracking Captured All 72 Flyby Images • Nav too Accurate, Bank Turn Computed but too Small to Implement • Operations Would Have Succeeded at Wild 2 CERR - Duxbury

  4. SCOPE OF READINESS PREPARATION • Produced New Wild 2 Dust Production Model • 10 Times Less Collectable Dust w/ Ten Times More Hazardous Dust • Peer Reviewed w/ 15 International Comet Scientists • James Rose Chaired Review • Current Model Viewed as Worst Case/Upper Limit to Large Dust • Recommended Earth-based Observations for Additional Validation • Produced New Wild 2 Ephemerides • Accuracy of Time of Encounter Degraded from 30 seconds to 180 seconds (1,100 km 1s) • Reviewed by Navigation Advisory Group (NAG) • Validated New Model • Recommended Earth-based Observations for Additional Validation CERR - Duxbury

  5. SCOPE OF READINESS PREPARATION • Reviewed Science Requirements and Spacecraft Safety • Moved Flyby from 150 km to 300 km for S/C Safety • Response to New Dust Model • Reduced Collection from 1,000 Particles > 15 mm to 500 • Effect of New Dust Model • Reduced # Images Within 2,000 km from 65 to 30 • Effect of Degraded Time of Encounter Uncertainty • New Mission Success Criteria in Approval Cycle at NASA HQ • Changes to Level 1 Requirements Need OSS Associate Administer Approval • Is a Given for This Review CERR - Duxbury

  6. SCOPE OF READINESS PREPARATION • Conducted Readiness Reviews of Key Operational Elements • Nav Readiness Review by Navigation Advisory Group (NAG) • Deep Space Mission Systems (DSMS) Readiness Review • Multi Mission Office (MMO) Ground Data System Readiness Review • Planetary Data System (PDS) Review of Data Archive Formats and Contents - Used for Operations as Well • Meetings with JPL Office of Communications and Education Continuing • 20+ Full Tests of Encounter Sequence with Expected Range in Variables Plus Anomalies Nearing Completion in the Spacecraft Test Laboratory • Conducting Operational Readiness Testing (ORT’s) • Radio + Opt Nav for E-2d TCM Completed • E-2d to E-6h ORT Remaining • Science ORT Remaining • E/PO ORT Remaining • Camera Cleanup Performed / Opt Nav Images Started • Compliant w/ Flight Project Practices CERR - Duxbury

  7. SCOPE OF READINESS PREPARATION CERR - Duxbury

  8. READINESS • Simple Flyby Trajectory at Encounter • Straight Line Motion Past a Massless Body • Moved from Previous Planned Flyby of 150 km to 300 km • Reduced Spacecraft Risk at Flyby by a Factor of 2 • Reduced Delivery Performance by Nav by a Factor of 2 • Successful Flyby Totally Dependent on OpNav • Needs DS1 Level of Sensitivity and Geometric Accuracy • Op Nav Already Detected Wild 2 - Will Significantly Ease Encounter Operations • Deleted Many Contingency Plans if Detection was Late • No Need to Take Lots of Pictures and Co-Add on the Ground for Detection as Planned • Can Implement Leisurely Trajectory Correction Maneuver Schedule and Miss a Few if Needed • The Remaining Presentations will Demonstrate • Relative Ease of Remaining Operations • Excellent Preparation and Qualifications of Flight Team • Robust Timeline w/ Excellent Margin and Contingency Strategies • The STARDUST Project is Ready for Wild 2 CERR - Duxbury

More Related