130 likes | 202 Views
Prepared by John K Chung For Presentation to RCARO 2010 July Cheju Workshop. Directions for Enhancing Promotion of RCA Activities. What is Past, is a Prologue. – Hamlet -. Without the past, no present. Present is the basis for the future. The Past (1).
E N D
Prepared by John K Chung For Presentation to RCARO 2010 July Cheju Workshop Directions for Enhancing Promotion of RCA Activities
Without the past, no present. Present is the basis for the future.
The Past (1) • 1997 Yangon: Recommended establishment of an RCA Regional Office in the Region to enhance RCA ownership by MSs • 1998 Taupo: Discussed possible establishment of an RCA office similar to UNDP Project Office in the Region • 2000 Mumbai: Korea offered hosting of the RCA Regional Office in Korea. MSs welcomed. • 2001 Dhaka: MSs fully supported establishment of RCARO in Korea • 2001 Vienna: 30th RCA GCM agreed the establishment of the RCA Regional Office in Korea (2-year interim period)
The Past (2) • 2002 Daejeon: The RCA Regional Office was officially opened • 2002 Vienna: 31 GCM adopted Working Paper on the establishment and operation of RCARO in Korea • 2003 Vienna: 32 GCM adopted RCA Resolution • Reconfirms roles and function of Dir.-RCARO • Requests Government of Korea to continue all necessary support for RCARO operation • Requests all RCA MSs to support and cooperate with RCARO • 2007 Vienna: 36 GCM adopted RCA Resolution on the roles and status of RCARO • Confirms Dir-RCARO has authority to act on behalf of RCA in order to fulfill its mandate as set out in the GOR of RCA • Requests all MSs to provide necessary support for Dir-RCARO with their best capacity • Requests IAEA’s RCA Secretariat to continue extending cooperation to RCARO • 2007 Vienna: GOR amended incorporating Appointment, Roles and Responsibilities of Dir-RCARO as well as RCARO SAC
Present • Identity Crisis • Not yet recognized by the RCA Agreement • Still within the framework of KAERI • No proper legal status of Dir-RCARO when representing RCA before international development community • No official administrative interactions with IAEA’s • RCA and the MTS • Project should suit to RCA priority (No more thematic sectors) • The Project: the fewer, the better philosophy • Seems more emphasis on non-RCA projects • Role of RCA Coordinator (now RCA Focal Person)
Future • Some good indications of host government of RCARO • Korea joined in OECD DAC(Development Assistance Committee) in 2009: From newly developed industrial country to advanced donor country • Korea will upgrade ODA/GNI from current 0.09% to 0.25% by 2015 (ideally, 0.7%) • Cooperation between KOICA and RCARO envisioned • Role of Korea in international development community • Export nuclear power plants to UAE and so on • Chair the G-20 Seoul Summit in 2010 • Host the Nuclear Security Summit in 2012
Some suggestions for paradigm change • Recognition of RCARO’s legal personality • Enhanced partnership based on ownership of individual RCARO initiated projects • Harmonization among donor countries in RCA region • Alignment of development strategies of developing RCA MSs • Mutual accountability between RCARO and RCA MSs
Recognition • Revision of RCA Agreement incorporating RCARO status • Agreement between IAEA and Government of Korea regarding the operation of RCARO • Recognition of RCARO as an international-level organization by host government • Restructuring of RCARO (e.g. Introducing Deputy Director)
Partnership • Contribution by the RCA MSs to the RCARO initiated projects (Financial or in-kind) • Attract fund from other international or regional development organizations to RCARO initiated projects
Harmonization • Harmonization among RCA donor countries in implementing projects (AUL, JPN etc)
Alignment • Best reference to the Agency’s CPF(Country Programme Framework) • Coherence for development policy of MSs
Accountability • Proper system for project evaluation based on outcomes