1 / 24

Requirements Way Ahead 24 August 2009

Requirements Way Ahead 24 August 2009. Service HQ. Service Comp. R. COCOM. Joint Training Requirement. Definition : The intersection of a COCOM’s, Service Component’s, and a Service Headquarters’s training needs linked directly to authoritative higher-level guidance. Characteristics :

kent
Download Presentation

Requirements Way Ahead 24 August 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Requirements Way Ahead 24 August 2009

  2. Service HQ Service Comp R COCOM Joint Training Requirement Definition: The intersection of a COCOM’s, Service Component’s, and a Service Headquarters’s training needs linked directly to authoritative higher-level guidance Characteristics: • Identified by a COCOM, Evaluated by a Service Component, Supported by a Service Headquarters, then Validated by the submitting COCOM • Directed by Higher-level guidance: • Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 1322.18 – Military Training • Guidance for Development of the Force (GDF) • Guidance for the Employment of the Force (GEF) • CJCS High Interest Training Issues (HITIs) • COCOM Theater Campaign & Training Plans • Joint Training Plan High Interest Training Requirements (HITRs) • Requirements shall be framed in terms of Joint Mission Essential Tasks (JMETs) and should address documented readiness issues in the Defense Readiness Reporting System (DRRS) • May address training from tactical to strategic

  3. Example • Requirement: Conduct integrated theater missile detection and defensive operations • Submitters: • COCOM – USNORTHCOM (and others) • Service Component – ARSTRAT (and others) • Service HQ – USN (and others) • Linkage to Higher Level Guidance: • GDF – Prevent Hostile States and Non-State Actors from Acquiring or Using WMD • CJCS HITI – Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction • USNORTHCOM HITR – NORAD Aerospace Control and Warning Operations • DRRS Readiness Shortfall – Conduct Ballistic Missile Defense Operations • Applicable Mission Essential Task: • NORTHCOM • SN 3.4.3.4 – Manage Global Integrated Missile Defense Capabilities • ST 6.1.7 – Conduct Ballistic Missile Defense Operations • ARSTRAT • SN 3.4.3.4 – Manage Global Integrated Missile Defense Capabilities • Navy • TA 3.2.7 – Conduct Air and Missile Defense Operations • OP 6.1 – Provide Operational Air, Space, and Missile Defense • Level of War: Strategic, Operational, and Tactical Front End Analysis begins outside of JNTC Impact NORTHCOM unable to execute ST 6.1.7 Cut in T2$ prevents USN from executing TA 3.2.7

  4. Business Case Training Development JNTC JNTC Process Prioritization based on e.g. # stakeholders # tasks affected transition plan ROI Solution Identification Resourcing Solution Development Front End Analysis Supported COCOM Supporting – JWFC Training Development Community of Interest COCOMs Services Agencies Transition to Training Program Requirement SC SHQ R COCOM Validation Fully integrated? Does it met requirement? Feedback

  5. Accreditation and Certification Way Ahead 24 August 2009

  6. Improved Accreditation/Certification Process Accreditation now prescriptive in nature Programs and tasks selected by the JWFC based on COCOM and COCOM Component training needs Accreditation schedule will largely focus on re-looks of accredited programs Adds new tasks that align with the most current training requirements/guidance TD decisions and activities based on rigorous front-end analysis of validated training requirements. Accomplished outside of the JNTC requirements process Accreditation/Certification issues remain responsibility of programs A/C issues not JWFC problems to solve Mitigation backlog resolved Issues analyzed and returned with few exceptions

  7. Accreditation Process CJCS: HITIs COCOMs: HITRs (Front-end Analysis) JWFC selects programs & tasks for Accreditation based on prioritized UJTs Commander, JWFC approves prioritized list of UJTs Shortfall Assessment to Program Execute Accreditation Based on Elements of Joint Context Program Decides Which A/C Issues to Pursue as Requirements

  8. Example Tasks and Programs for Accreditation • Air/Missile Defense • ST 6.1.7 Conduct Ballistic Missile Defense Operations • NORTHCOM • OP 6.5.4 Secure Air, Land, and Sea Lines of Communications (LOCs) in JOA • BF, JRTC, BCTP, NTC, JMRC, USAREUR • IO/Cyber • OP 5.6.1 Integrate Operational Information Operations • BF, MAGTF TC, FST, JTFEX, JRTC, NTC, JMRC • Joint Fires • OP 3.2.7 Synchronize Operational Firepower • FST, JTFEX, AWF, BF, VF, GF-E, GF-W, RF-N, JRTC, BCTP, NTC, JMRC, USAREUR, MAGTF TC CIED • TA 6.9/OP 6.2.2.1 Conduct Counter Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Operations • BF, GF-E, GF-W, JRTC, BCTP, NTC, MSTP, JMRC IW • OP 1.2.8 Conduct Joint Urban Operations • GF-E, GF-W, RF-N, BCTP, USAREUR, JKCE

  9. Solution Identified (Not Resourced) Open Not in Mitigation Others 15 Solution Identified (Not Resourced) 11 Open 5 Not in Mitigation 24 Emerald Warrior Issues Way Ahead 767 * Total A/C issues 334 Complete (Archived) *54 - Retained 379 – Returned To Program Solution Implemented (Resourced) 55 – Reviewed High Potential Issues

  10. Benefits of Accreditation/Certification Validates Joint Training based on elements of Joint Context Supports COCOM/COCOM Component war fighting requirements PBR’s to address A/C shortfalls will still score higher Accreditation earns program a ticket to participate in JTCP Positive impact on BRAC process for Installations with resident JNTC Accredited Training Programs and Certified sites Certification ensures adherence to Joint technical standards Improves interoperability

  11. Accreditation/Certification Way Ahead • Conduct front-end analysis to focus Accreditation on COCOM & COCOM Component Requirements • Selection of Training Programs and Tasks to be accredited based on this front-end analysis • A/C outcome is a shortfall assessment provided to the program that is eligible to enter into TD requirements process once the shortfall becomes a valid requirement • Legacy issues returned to programs

  12. Back Up Slides

  13. Challenge Overview Accreditation process had flaws that needed to be reworked Issues and activities were not based on a valid, relevant front end analysis A/C issues automatically became JWFC problems to solve Huge backlog prevented agility in execution

  14. Benefits Repairs structural flaws in process while retaining favorable aspects and visibility on joint training issues Focuses our efforts and improves linkages to Warfighter joint training priorities Improves fiscal accountability and effectiveness Allows immediate reengagement with customers and stakeholders to minimizes loss of trust

  15. Assumptions • Every “Requirement” JWFC Takes On To Solve Must Always: • Come through the COCOM-Service Component-Service vetting • Have documented basis in high level guidance and nested tasks • Be framed in terms of JMETs • Core Capabilities Are Continuously Maintained: • Configuration management process • Developed IAW roadmaps and architectures • Process Must Be Agile To Meet All Challenges • Some flexibility and judgment must be applied to each situation • Process procedures used are variable and situation dependent • The same parties have an interest throughout the process although the lead and the main effort change periodically • An Integrated Product Team approach is indicated (Community of Interest)

  16. Excellence Identified The and for Joint Training

  17. CY10 New Program Accreditation Example: Program Not Yet Accredited • HITIs and HITRs • Irregular Warfare • Joint Intelligence • Joint Fires • Dynamic Targeting • TTP to Defeat IEDs • Strategic Communications • Information Operations • Cyberspace Operations • Personnel Recovery • Combat ID • Airspace Management • Combating WMD • Theater Air & Missile Defense • Unified Actions • Stability Operations • Maritime Interception Operations • Other • Corresponding UJTL Tasks • Prepared by JWFC TD Requirements Division and approved by CDR JWFC • (U) OP 4.7.7 Conduct Foreign Internal Defense (FID) • https://jdeis.js.mil/jdeis/ujtl_demo/ujtlData.jsp?id=2837 • Services / USSOCOM Identify Training Programs Conducting That Task • Venue: MARSOC Raven Training Program (29-Palms) • Training Audience: MARSOC units

  18. CY10 New Task Accreditation Example: Program Already Accredited (New Task) • HITIs and HITRs • Irregular Warfare • Joint Intelligence • Joint Fires • Dynamic Targeting • TTP to Defeat IEDs • Strategic Communications • Information Operations • Cyberspace Operations • Personnel Recovery • Combat ID • Airspace Management • Combating WMD • Theater Air & Missile Defense • Unified Actions • Stability Operations • Maritime Interception Operations • Other • Corresponding UJTL Task • Prepared by JWFC TD Requirements and approved by CDR JWFC • (U) OP 3.1 Conduct Joint Force Targeting • https://jdeis.js.mil/jdeis/ujtl_demo/ujtlData.jsp?id=2761 • Services Identify Training Programs Conducting That Task • Venue: Blue Flag (Hurlburt Field, FL) • Training Audience: Numbered Air Forces • Combined Air Operations Center • Combined Force Air Component Command • Air Support Element (ASE)

  19. Definition: Accreditation “A determination that a Combatant Command, Service, or component training program or organization has the capability to conduct training on joint tasks thereby providing the training audience a realistic joint environment, that includes the appropriate elements of joint context for the joint tasks, or portions of joint tasks, being trained.” JNTC Accreditation CONOPs, 7 March 2005

  20. Elements of Joint Context • Those forces, control organizations, systems, and supporting infrastructure that make up the joint training environment expected to be encountered in real-world operations for specific universal joint tasks.

  21. Definition: Certification “A determination that training sites and systems are compliant with specified Department of Defense (DoD) and Joint National Training Capability (JNTC) architectures, configurations, and standards required to create a supportable, realistic joint training environment.” * In accordance with JNTC Certification CONOPs, 7 Mar 05

  22. Certification Focus Areas Accreditation and Certification are linked in that certification will make certain that the systems, networks, architectures, etc., needed to produce the required elements of joint context are available, supportable and meet the established joint standards. L / V / CINTEGRATION INTEGRATED LOG SUPT C2 / IM / KM PROGRAM MGMT OPFOR / SITFOR ENVIRON-MENTAL MGMT AAR, INSTRUM- ENTATION CONFIG MGMT

  23. Foundation of the Joint Training Environment

  24. What is “Joint Context?” “The joint environment necessary to accurately and realistically train individuals, units, and organizations on a specific joint task or a portion thereof. It is achieved when all required joint systems, personnel, and equipment to execute the task in real-world operations are present or accurately replicated, realistically exercised, and evaluated.” JNTC Accreditation CONOPs, 7 March 2005

More Related