1 / 11

C.P0055 PSVT Joint Meeting of WG3 and SWG1.2

C.P0055 PSVT Joint Meeting of WG3 and SWG1.2. Problem Statement. V ideo codecs used in 3GPP 2 are flexible and designed to be leveraged across multiple applications and multiple networks

larya
Download Presentation

C.P0055 PSVT Joint Meeting of WG3 and SWG1.2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. C.P0055 PSVTJoint Meeting of WG3 and SWG1.2

  2. Problem Statement • Video codecs used in 3GPP2 are flexible and designed to be leveraged across multiple applications and multiple networks • IETF protocols (e.g. RTP, RTCP, SDP and SIP) are also generic and developed to be leveraged across multiple services and multiple networks • For 3GPP2 Packet Switched Video Telephony, • What are the optimal settings for codecs and protocols? • What is the impact on the user experience?

  3. Impact on User Experience • Performance degradation due to packet losses • Packetization choices and reduction in available bandwidth • Impact of RTCP on media payload bandwidth • Timeliness of RTCP feedback • Error mitigation solutions • encoder based • transport based • decoder based • Latency issues • etc.

  4. Video / Audio Codec Video / Audio Codec RTP Packet Loss S / W RTP RTP UDP UDP IP IP cdma2000 / WCDMA cdma2000 / WCDMA MS Bitrate MS or Content Server MAC-PDU Sizes Error Masks Effect of Packet Losses? • RTP-level error insertion software tool • Maps MAC-PDU loss traces to SDU losses seen by the decoder

  5. Example: Foreman • SCH 8x in RC3 (MAC-PDU size = 160 octets) • Channel = Model A (Ped 3km/h) • FER = 1%; Active set = 1; Geometry = 6dB

  6. What do we measure? • Objective metric: PSNR averaged over the session • Usage is similar to that as MOS for vocoders • Not informative for video in error prone conditions • New Objective Video Quality metrics under development • Percentage Degraded Video Duration (pDVD) • Standard deviation of PSNR (STD_PSNR) over the session • In addition to average PSNR • Motivation: Objective metrics correlate well with user experience

  7. Potential Gains : Foreman Example • Timely feedback is used in this example and compared with regular Intra-refresh (FER=3%) • Last two rows compare RTT of 200 ms and 500 ms, respectively

  8. Potential Gains : Foreman Example

  9. Common Conditions • Video Source • C12-20051012-006, “Video Database for 3GPP2 multimedia services”, Apple Computer and Qualcomm Inc. • Test Conditions • C12-20051024-004, “Test Conditions for Video Codec Performance in PSVT”, Qualcomm Inc. • Proposed Bearers for PSVT (C12-20051024-004) • SET-1 : • Average bitrate: Conversational Interactive Video 32k (ProfileID = 0x0301) • Maximum bitrate: Conversational Interactive Video 48k (ProfileID = 0x0303) • SET-2 : • Average bitrate: Conversational Interactive Video 40k (ProfileID = 0x0302) • Maximum bitrate: Conversational Interactive Video 56k (ProfileID = 0x0304) • Set-3 : • Average bitrate: Conversational Interactive Video 24k (ProfileID = 0x0300) • Maximum bitrate: Conversational Interactive Video 64k (ProfileID = 0x0305)

  10. What we need from WG-3 • Reverse link and Forward link error-delay traces for the 3 sets • Typical loading conditions • Low, Medium and Full • Typical range of FER conditions (at MAC-PDU level) • 0.5, 1 and 2% • Typical geometries • The above will be included in the TR “Simulation Methodology for Multimedia Services”, C00-20051205-037R2

  11. Assumptions • Typical forward link scheduling algorithm • Adequate information to enable cross-validation • For video streams, packet loss rate is a dominant factor affecting user experience • Impact of random placement of I-frames on packet delivery times (due to Scheduler on the forward link) • do not significantly affect “delay distribution profiles” • small differences in distribution profiles do not have significant effect on the user experience in VT • can be ignored in the generation of error-delay profiles for video streams • Jitter and Packet losses in the core network are negligible, compared with those on the air interface • The MAC-level error-delay profiles can be post-processed to include core network effects in future

More Related