1 / 9

Transfer Function for Separation Dipoles

Transfer Function for Separation Dipoles. Frank Zimmermann LHCCWG 12.07.2006. Discussions with O. Bruning, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi. the problem. D1-D2 transfer function errors can have a significant effect on closed orbit during squeeze (10 units → 3 s orbit change at triplet)

lawrencia-benedict
Download Presentation

Transfer Function for Separation Dipoles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Transfer Function for Separation Dipoles Frank Zimmermann LHCCWG 12.07.2006 Discussions with O. Bruning, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi

  2. the problem D1-D2 transfer function errors can have a significant effect on closed orbit during squeeze (10 units → 3s orbit change at triplet) local correction requires careful analysis and distinction between • D1/D2 transfer function errors • Triplet alignment errors • Triplet gradient errors with crossing-angle bump offsets [O. Bruning, Chamonix XII]

  3. IR1 layout D2 D2 D1 D1 separate BPM common BPMs separate BPM BPM distances to IP: 21.35, 31.53, 58.32, 151.14 m

  4. original procedure • triplet alignment optics with low-b quads off to define straight line with 6 or 8 BPMs; • k-modulation of individual Q1, Q2 or Q3 magnets to find offsets w.r.t. to reference line from BPMs • differences in the lines for beam1 and beam2 indicates D1/D2 transfer line error • after correcting D1/D2 powering error obtain reference line for triplet alignment [O. Bruning, Chamonix XII]

  5. LHC triplet alignment optics [A. Verdier, LHC PN 325, 2003] requires about half the nominal emittance for aperture reasons; x&y tunes lower by 1 unit, if IR1 & 5 both use this optics

  6. “refined” procedure (?) • correct incoming beam upstream of D2 for zero offset and angle • adjust D1 on one side to steer beam on 0-slope trajectory through the IP • then look at other side • and/or adjust D1 and D2 together to get both beams on the same orbit? S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, F.Z.

  7. problems • low-b quads: misalignment of mechanical & magnetic axes 0.1-0.2 mm in x, 0.5 mm in y; beam needs to be steered through the mechanical center! • BPM offsets may cause error of up to 5 mrad (?), compared with total deflection angle of 1.5 mrad; this is larger than desired precision of 3x10-4 • BPMs might have different offsets for beam1 and beam2 (?) S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, F.Z.

  8. questions • in which aspect is the D1/D2 transfer function effect any different from other closed-orbit errors of the two beams, and why does it need to be treated differently? • do we want to measure transfer functions with beam at 450 GeV and at 7 TeV? • do we want to use alignment optics?; if yes, with which beam and which BPM resolution?

  9. I propose following procedure • alignment optics at injection to define straight reference line for both beams (BPM readings) • K-modulation to measure quad misalignments and align where necessary • apply 2-beam orbit correction across IR region; include D1 and D2 as additional correctors

More Related