1 / 13

Tagging relations to achieve complex search goals

Tagging relations to achieve complex search goals. Rossano Schifanella Luca Maria Aiello Giancarlo Ruffo Arc 2 s group, Torino, Italy. NWeSP 2011, Salamanca. WHY DO WE TAG?. Bookmarking, categorization, description, simple search tasks …. 25%.

liora
Download Presentation

Tagging relations to achieve complex search goals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tagging relations to achieve complex search goals RossanoSchifanella Luca Maria Aiello Giancarlo Ruffo Arc2s group, Torino, Italy NWeSP 2011, Salamanca

  2. WHY DO WE TAG? Bookmarking, categorization, description, simple search tasks… NWeSP 2011

  3. 25% query volume for complex search tasks on search engines Donato et al. “Do you want to take notes?: identifying research missions in Yahoo! search pad” WWW 2010 NWeSP 2011

  4. In a complex search process, the user relates different objects and notions, with a very time-consuming activity. IDEA: Tag complex cognitive relations and share them with users with the same needs. TAGS COULD DO MORE! NWeSP 2011

  5. 13,317 Flickr users, 230,020 photosets, 7,188,004 pictures. Very often, sets of tagged items have titles that do not overlap with its inner tags. THE “GESTALT EFFECT” IN TAGGING NWeSP 2011

  6. FOLKSONOMY DEFINITION Instances of A are called triples NWeSP 2011

  7. RELATIONAL FOLKSONOMY Depending on the definition of ρ we can obtain Sets,Lists,Trees,Graphs , Hypergraphs, … NWeSP 2011

  8. … USE CASE NWeSP 2011

  9. ADVANTAGES NWeSP 2011 Organizing and sharing complex search experience Social search Collaborative editing Navigability of the results

  10. PORTAL: BUNDLE CREATION NWeSP 2011

  11. http://mumb.di.unito.it PORTAL: SEARCH PHASE NWeSP 2011

  12. Tagging user-generated RELATIONS to enable a new form of social search Improve web portal and collect data Recommendation on the basis of relation affinity SUMMARY FUTURE DIRECTIONS New relational folksonomymodel NWeSP 2011

More Related