410 likes | 1.03k Views
Outline. History of Crash Data Collection at HCSOGrant Funding Obtained through FDOTTraffic Analyst position establishedMilestones and AccomplishmentsWho is involved?What will the CDMS do? Tools and FunctionsHow do we use the CDMS today? . Crash Data Collection. Crash ReportData Entry into
E N D
1. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY TRAFFIC CRASH DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Presented by John W. Chaffin
Research and Development Bureau
Crime Analysis Unit, Manager
October 9, 2006
2. Outline History of Crash Data Collection at HCSO
Grant Funding Obtained through FDOT
Traffic Analyst position established
Milestones and Accomplishments
Who is involved?
What will the CDMS do? Tools and Functions
How do we use the CDMS today?
3. Crash Data Collection Crash Report
Data Entry into Traffic Accident Reporting System (TARS)
TARS written in late 1980s
TARS captures all fields of crash report excluding narrative
TARS database is antiquated
TARS does not have any data analysis tools
4. TARS Database in Mapper Tars database set up in mapper Cabinet with 4 separate Rids containing pertinent crash data from report. The rids function separately but are mutually connected by the agency report. TARS was created in 1986 and was on the cutting edge of technology then for Traffic crash data management. But as Technology has changed drastically over the past 18 years, TARS has not. Tars database set up in mapper Cabinet with 4 separate Rids containing pertinent crash data from report. The rids function separately but are mutually connected by the agency report. TARS was created in 1986 and was on the cutting edge of technology then for Traffic crash data management. But as Technology has changed drastically over the past 18 years, TARS has not.
5. Tars Code Tables Each column with data in the TARS database has a code table with values that correspond to data indicated on the crash report. Most of the code tables are represented by number values. Each column with data in the TARS database has a code table with values that correspond to data indicated on the crash report. Most of the code tables are represented by number values.
6. Accident Info: Where, When, etc. Accident Information RID gives us about as much information as the CAD system. Where, Date, DOW, Time, Report#. Accident Information RID gives us about as much information as the CAD system. Where, Date, DOW, Time, Report#.
7. Vehicle/Persons- Who, Vehicle, etc. Vehicle/Persons RID tells us what persons and vehicles were involved. Aside from the VEHICLE MAKE. This is not easily decipherable without great assistance from the code tables. Data is very HARD to extract. NO LOCATION FIELD. Vehicle/Persons RID tells us what persons and vehicles were involved. Aside from the VEHICLE MAKE. This is not easily decipherable without great assistance from the code tables. Data is very HARD to extract. NO LOCATION FIELD.
8. Accident Detail Contributing Causes, Harmful events, Weather, etc Looking at the ACCIDENT DETAIL RID, this data should tell us about the sequence of events that led to the crash, such as the drivers actions, road conditions, weather, etc. Again, NO LOCATION FIELD. This would be an discouraging task to try and extract data about crashes and map. Looking at the ACCIDENT DETAIL RID, this data should tell us about the sequence of events that led to the crash, such as the drivers actions, road conditions, weather, etc. Again, NO LOCATION FIELD. This would be an discouraging task to try and extract data about crashes and map.
9. Citation Information The Citation RID is a little more informative, yet again lies the problem that it is in a different Rid and it is very time consuming and a painstaking task to match this data up to the other 3 rids for overall analysis and mapping. The Citation RID is a little more informative, yet again lies the problem that it is in a different Rid and it is very time consuming and a painstaking task to match this data up to the other 3 rids for overall analysis and mapping.
10. CAD Calls for ServiceWhere and When Only Our best source of immediately available data to map is the CFS from our CAD system. The analyst can map this easily and quickly, yet it is limited in the data is provides: where and when. Our best source of immediately available data to map is the CFS from our CAD system. The analyst can map this easily and quickly, yet it is limited in the data is provides: where and when.
11. HCSO Obtains Crash Data Analysis Grant Three year grant awarded by Florida Department of Transportation effective December 10, 2003
Traffic Analyst starts in Community Relations Section February 6, 2004
Hillsborough County Sheriffs Office and Hillsborough County Public Works holds press conference February 13, 2004
12. Milestones and Accomplishments February 19, 2004: First monthly meeting with Traffic Analyst at the Sheriffs Traffic Operations Plan (STOP) committee meeting and first monthly traffic crash report, continuing monthly thereafter at each STOP meeting
Top 20 Traffic Crash Corridors are identified during February 2004
Deployment of HCSO Traffic Units for Selective Enforcement Initiatives takes a paradigm shift after February 2004 monthly report is distributed
Traffic Enforcement Initiatives begin in February 2004 targeting the identified crash corridors and continues
Set up a database for tracking and mapping purposes to identify the last drinking location of DUI offenders for the Responsible Vendor Program
13. Whos Involved? Hillsborough County Sheriffs Office
Hillsborough County Public Works
Florida Department of Transportation D7
Florida Highway Patrol
Tindale-Oliver and Associates, Inc.
City of Tampa
14. Using GIS Technology to Improve Analysis Streamline Accessibility to Traffic Crash Data
Less time consuming and cumbersome to analyze data
All data fields and related information in manageable GIS database
More Focused Crash Analysis
Red Light Running Crashes
Speeding Related Crashes
DUI Crashes
Aggressive Driving Enforcement
Unrestrained drivers
Identification of Crash Corridors for Focused Enforcement Initiatives Moving towards a more integrated approach. We will have the data previously seen from Mapper snapshots in one Geodatabase using ArcGIS. The data will be in plain English and will allow the Analyst to be able to focus there efforts towards ANALYSIS rather than just modifying and aggregating the data from TARS so that it is understandable. Moving towards a more integrated approach. We will have the data previously seen from Mapper snapshots in one Geodatabase using ArcGIS. The data will be in plain English and will allow the Analyst to be able to focus there efforts towards ANALYSIS rather than just modifying and aggregating the data from TARS so that it is understandable.
15. Getting the Data to GIS
16. Crash Geodatabase
17. Symbology Layers
18. Symbology Layers
19. Symbology Layers
20. TOA Crash Data Tools
21. TOA Crash Data Tools
22. TOA Crash Data Tools
23. TOA Crash Data Tools
24. TOA Crash Data Tools
25. TOA Crash Data Tools
26. TOA Crash Data Tools
27. TOA Crash Data Tools
28. TOA Crash Data Tools
29. TOA Crash Data Tools
30. TOA Crash Data Tools
31. TOA Crash Data Tools
32. TOA Crash Data Tools
33. What do we do at HCSO? Monthly Traffic Crash Report for STOP
Frequency analysis (time and day)
Spatial analysis (Layer summary by area)
Comparative analysis of crash corridors
Enforcement Activity analysis
Monthly Traffic Fatality Summary
Tracking and monitoring of responsible vendor database
Requested crash data analysis for enforcement initiatives
Crash analysis studies for command staff
Assist public safety and traffic engineering agencies
34. Monthly STOP Report
35. Monthly STOP Report
36. Traffic Fatality Summary for Command Staff
37. Assisting Other Agencies
38. Questions and Discussion
39. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY TRAFFIC CRASH DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
October 9, 2006