1 / 43

Geoffrey Crisp ALTC National Teaching Fellow

Assessment 2.0 – assessment in an interactive, participatory and distributed environment. Geoffrey Crisp ALTC National Teaching Fellow Director, Centre for Learning and Professional Development University of Adelaide. Examples and presentations available at.

Download Presentation

Geoffrey Crisp ALTC National Teaching Fellow

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessment 2.0 – assessment in an interactive, participatory and distributed environment Geoffrey Crisp ALTC National Teaching Fellow Director, Centre for Learning and Professional Development University of Adelaide

  2. Examples and presentations available at http://www.transformingassessment.com Mathew Hillier Shamim Joarder 19/11/2014 2

  3. Outline of presentation QUT context introduction to learning and assessment traditional e-assessments examples of interactive e-assessments assessment in virtual environments assessment tasks for the future 19/11/2014 3

  4. 2010 FaST Curriculum Review 2.4 Aspirations in Teaching and Learning Design • Recommendation 25 Design, develop and implement an award architecture which is backward mapped, employs ‘inverted curricula’ and includes exposure to the breadth of Faculty offerings in the sciences, mathematics, information and the application of technologies • Recommendation 26 Embed principles of good curricular design, assessment, first year experience, graduate outcomes, participation, capstone, work integrated learning and research pathway construction and leverage the support, resources and communities of practice available within the University

  5. QUT Assessment Policy • Assessment is valued as a strategy to support student learning • Assessment cohesively links the learning outcomes, content, and learning and teaching approaches at the unit and course levels • Assessment is an integral part of the whole of course design and gives particular attention to the needs of first year students • Assessment provides valid evidence of learning outcomes at the unit level and may contribute to assessment of student learning at the course level including graduate capabilities • Assessment approaches are consistent with QUT’s approach to real world learning and teaching and include a variety of assessment tasks • Assessment reflects rigorous academic standards associated with the discipline and is based on pre-determined and clearly articulated criteria, associated standards and weightings • Assessment is fair, equitable and inclusive and clearly communicated to students • Assessment approaches ensure that reliable and consistent judgments are made about a student's performance and that academic integrity is promoted

  6. Outline of presentation QUT context introduction to learning and assessment traditional e-assessments examples of interactive e-assessments assessment in virtual environments assessment tasks for the future 19/11/2014 6

  7. Typical learning and assessment today? http://www.flickr.com/photos/cristic/359572656/ http://www.pharmtox.utoronto.ca/Assets/Photos/pcl473+classroom+editted.JPG 7

  8. New learning environments for students and teachers 19/11/2014 8

  9. Authentic learning and assessment – inverted curriculum approach http://www.nasaimages.org/luna/servlet/detail/nasaNAS~9~9~58363~162207: 9

  10. Do you want the red pill or the blue pill? http://www.urvoting.com 19/11/2014 10

  11. Assessment tasks should be worth doing if students can answer questions by copying from the web, you are asking the wrong questions if students can answer questions by using Google, you are asking the wrong questions if students can answer questions by guessing, you are asking the wrong questions Why the hell am I doing this course? 19/11/2014 11

  12. Different assessment typesAssessment is valued as a strategy to support student learningAssessment cohesively links the learning outcomes, content, and learning and teaching approaches at the unit and course levels

  13. Outline of presentation QUT context introduction to learning and assessment traditional e-assessments examples of interactive e-assessments assessment in virtual environments assessment tasks for the future 19/11/2014 13

  14. Question types - LMS 19/11/2014 14

  15. Bobby Elliot and assessment 1.5 to 2.0

  16. Assessment 1.0 v Assessment 2.0 Assessment 1.0 Assessment 2.0 http://www.scribd.com/doc/461041/Assessment-20 Given Done alone Descriptive Text Closed book Done in class Teacher assessed Negotiated Done collaboratively Researched/Deep Text/audio/video Open web Done anywhere Self- and peer-assessed

  17. Outline of presentation QUT context introduction to learning and assessment traditional e-assessments examples of interactive e-assessments assessment in virtual environments assessment tasks for the future 19/11/2014 17

  18. Interactive e-assessment designAssessment approaches are consistent with QUT’s approach to real world learning and teaching and include a variety of assessment tasks Separate the interactive tool/object/artefact from the question and the feedback

  19. Guessing answers

  20. QuickTime VR 19/11/2014

  21. Interactive spreadsheets

  22. Interactivity - Chemistry Java applet 22

  23. 19/11/2014 23

  24. Process of problem solving - IMMEX http://www.immex.ucla.edu

  25. Process of problem solving - IMMEX http://www.immex.ucla.edu

  26. IMMEX output – capability maps Kong, S.C., Ogata, H., Arnseth, H.C., Chan, C.K.K., Hirashima, T., Klett, F., Lee, J.H.M., Liu, C.C., Looi, C.K., Milrad, M., Mitrovic,A., Nakabayashi, K., Wong, S.L., Yang, S.J.H. (eds.) (2009). Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education

  27. Outline of presentation QUT context introduction to learning and assessment traditional e-assessments examples of interactive e-assessments assessment in virtual environments assessment tasks for the future 19/11/2014 27

  28. Characteristics of Web 2.0 • user-generated content • encouragement and facilitation of participation • access and openness • (almost) unlimited data sources • power of the crowd

  29. Self and Peer Assessment Tools

  30. What Happens in a Role Play? Reflection & Learning Adopt a role Issues & problems occur Interaction & debate

  31. Scenario-based learning http://www.pblinteractive.org 31

  32. Second Life – Virtual worlds 32

  33. Second Life examples http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ncj7xokweOc

  34. Second Life examples http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgkUtSSEpBc

  35. Second Life examples http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQruIhMVgYI

  36. Serious Games Institute http://www.seriousgamesinstitute.co.uk/ 36

  37. 37

  38. Simulations and games

  39. Augmented reality 39

  40. Outline of presentation QUT context introduction to learning and assessment traditional e-assessments examples of interactive e-assessments assessment in virtual environments assessment tasks for the future 19/11/2014 40

  41. Future assessments? • Will we see universal development of immersive and authentic learning and assessment environments? • Will assessments measure approaches to problem solving and student responses in terms of efficiency, ethical considerations and the involvement of others? • Will teachers be able to construct future assessments or will this be a specialty activity? 41

  42. The e-Assessment Handbook and HERDSA Guide 42

  43. References • Nicol, D. J. 2009. Assessment for learner self-regulation: enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, no. 3: 335–352 • Knight, P. 2007. Fostering and assessing ‘wicked’ competences. http://www.open.ac.uk/cetl-workspace/cetlcontent/documents/460d1d1481d0f.pdf • Joughin, G. 2009. Assessment, Learning and Judgement. In G. Joughin (Ed) Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education. Springer p215-221 • Yorke, M. 2005. Increasing the chances of student success. In Improving student learning 12: Diversity and inclusivity, ed. C. Rust, 35–52. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development

More Related