120 likes | 214 Views
Reporting on Social Performance Standards Bern, 2010 SPTF Meeting. Micol Pistelli, Manager Social Performance Standards, MIX. Profile of the 208 MFIs reporting on SPS in 2009. 40% of MFIs reporting are from LAC
E N D
Reporting on Social Performance Standards Bern, 2010 SPTF Meeting Micol Pistelli, Manager Social Performance Standards, MIX
Profile of the 208 MFIs reporting on SPS in 2009 • 40% of MFIs reporting are from LAC • 52% of MFIs reporting are NGOs
Mission clarity • Top development goals by MFI’s type • Banks:1. income and productivity growth, business growth (100%), 2.employment generation (82%), 3.Poverty reduction (73%) • NGOs: 1.poverty reduction (90%); 2. business growth (81%); 3. employment generation (71%) • NBFIs:1. business growth (86%); 2. poverty reduction (80%); 3. income and productivity growth (52%) • Cooperatives: 1. employment creation (88%); 2dev. start up enterprises (75%); 3.poverty reduction, income and productivity growth (62%)
Tools for market research • 91% of MFIs do market research to identify the needs of clients and potential clients
Drop-out rates • Average drop-out is 27% • Dropouts higher for NGOs (avg. 28%) and NBFIs (30%); Banks (18%); cooperatives (7%) • Location (political context and competition) matter • Higher dropouts registered in MENA (57% of MFIs are above market average), followed by Asia (43%), ECA (43%), LAC (29%) and Africa (27%)
Client protection principles – policies implementation • The table shows the % of policies applied by each type of MFI for each CP principle • Banks appear the best positioned to apply the greatest number of policies for each CP principle • Overall MFIs have >50% of policies in place for each CP principle
Targeting the poor and measurement • Low income clients is the main target of all types of MFIs • The very poor are the target market mostly of NGOs • Overall, 31% of MFIs reported poverty data • Of the 174 MFIs having poverty reduction as a specific objective, only 37% reported poverty data • Tools most used are household income and household expenditure. 14 MFIs reported data using PPI (mostly from LAC) • Poverty data reporting by region: Asia (51%), Africa (47%), LAC (28%), ECA (27%) MENA (24%)
Challenges on reporting/data validation and analysis Reporting: • Not enough data on poverty profile of clients and progress out of poverty • General lack of data on outreach of non financial services, employment creation, children at school Data validation: • 16% of reporting MFIs had a social rating in 2009 • Social audits, if verified by a third party, may validate a core set of SPM indicators, but work still in progress • Investors starting to track SP core indicators in their due-diligence (but harmonization is needed) Data analysis: • Still issues of data quality • Linkages between Process and Results are sometimes unclear (is this a function of data quality?)
MIX agenda on social performance standards in 2010 • SPS data collection through September 2010 • Strengthen data validation process through collaboration with raters and auditors • Global analysis on social performance and analysis on synergies and tradeoffs with financial performance • ` • Inclusion of social performance data display on MIX Market • Change of the systems of diamonds of transparency to include SP reporting • Social performance information integrated in regional analysis
Thank you! For more information about MIX Social Performance Program please contact: Ms. Micol Pistelli at mpistelli@themix.org And visit our website: http://www.themix.org/standards/social-performance
MICROFINANCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE, INC. The leading provider of business information and data services for the microfinance industry. Web: www.themix.org Email: info@themix.org Headquarters: 1901 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 307 Washington, D.C. 20006 USA Other Locations Lima, Peru ● Rabat, Morocco ● Hyderabad, India