1 / 19

TIARA-PP Final meeting 25 – 27 November 2013

TIARA-PP Final meeting 25 – 27 November 2013. Work package 3 Accelerator R&D infrastructures. WP3 Partner institutes. CEA:   Antoine Daël ( and Francois Kircher ) CERN:                    Anders Unnervik (WP Coordinator) CNRS:                    Bernard Launé

maxime
Download Presentation

TIARA-PP Final meeting 25 – 27 November 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TIARA-PPFinal meeting 25 – 27 November 2013 Work package 3 Accelerator R&D infrastructures Anders Unnervik

  2. WP3 Partner institutes CEA:   Antoine Daël ( and Francois Kircher) CERN:                    Anders Unnervik (WP Coordinator) CNRS:                   Bernard Launé CIEMAT:               Diego Obradors-Campos DESY:                     Hans Weise GSI:                   Kei Sugita INFN:                    Paolo Pierini (Franco Cervelli) PSI:                        Thomas Schietinger (Deputy WP Coordinator) STFC:                     Peter McIntosh Uppsala Univ.: Roger Ruber IFJ PAN:                Slawomir Wronka Anders Unnervik

  3. Objectives Integrate and optimize the European infrastructures for accelerator R&D WP3.1A web-based database of existing, currently developed and planned accelerator R&D infrastructures (ARIs) WP3.2 Compare the outcome of WP3.1 with the current and future needs for Accelerator R&D (Needs defined by WP4). WP3.3Analyse options for sharing and developing ARIs with industry. WP3.4 Define a technology roadmap for the development of future accelerator components in industry WP3.5 Propose structures that can ensure the sustainability of the process described in WP3.2 and propose a common costing method for the operation, upgrade and construction of individual large ARIs. WP3.6Propose general access policies and modalities for accessing ARIs. WP3.7 Investigate models for linking between them different levels of infrastructures and establish criteria and procedures for joining TIARA. Anders Unnervik

  4. Gantt chart Anders Unnervik

  5. Milestones & deliverables Done Done Done Done Done Done Done Done Anders Unnervik

  6. Milestones & deliverables These are available on the TIARA webpage Anders Unnervik

  7. Deliverable D 3.1 Infrastructure Survey Report Deliverable D 3.2 Web-based InfrastructureDatabase Survey of accelerator R&D infrastructures in Europe Anders Unnervik

  8. Infrastructure data base, updated 20 November 2013 Survey of accelerator R&D infrastructures in Europe Austria 1 Czech Rep 1 Denmark 1 Finland 1 France 18 Germany 13 Italy 15 Netherlands 2 Poland 8 Romania 3 Slovenia 1 Spain 7 Sweden 4 Switzerland 50 UK12 137 infrastructures “listed” in 15 countries. Anders Unnervik

  9. Username: tiarapublic password: 69w%W)7Hp(9f Anders Unnervik

  10. Deliverable D 3.4 Infrastructure Access report • Sharing and developing R&D infrastructures jointly with industry • Analysis of access for industry to existing infrastructures • Determine the criteria and the rules for sharing R&D infrastructures • Investigating financial models for developing joint R&D infrastructures • Technology roadmap for accelerator component development • Basic components and materials that are today strategic Survey of accelerator R&D infrastructures in Europe Anders Unnervik

  11. Deliverable D 3.3 Infrastructure Need and Resource Comparison Deliverable D 3.5 Report on Potential Upgrades and/or Construction of new R&D Infrastructures Deliverable D 3.6 Joining TIARA and defining structures for sustaining and maintaining the infrastructure database Next deliverables Already presented by Antoine Daël Anders Unnervik

  12. Deliverable D 3.6 Joining TIARA and defining structures for sustaining and maintaining the infrastructure database With WP2 Next deliverables • Joining TIARA • Criteria • Procedures • Policy and modalities of accessing TIARA • for laboratories • For industry • Estimation of operation cost • Structure and actions for ensuring sustainability • Coordination with other infrastructures • Costing methods for the construction and upgrade of infrastructures Anders Unnervik

  13. How to chose the infrastructures That can be included in TIARA? Joining TIARA A list of “Necessary criteria to join the TIARA distributed accelerator R&D infrastructure” and a “Procedure to join the TIARA distributed accelerator R&D infrastructure” A committee, composed of TIARA representatives, will evaluate if the candidate meets all criteria and if the infrastructures proposed would be of interest for TIARA. The committee will prepare an evaluation report and make a recommendation to the TIARA governing body who will decide whether or not the candidate can join TIARA. Anders Unnervik

  14. Joining TIARA Criteria to join TIARA Submit a request to become a TIARA member in accordance with a defined procedure Be active in the field of accelerator technology research (KARAs) Be a legal entity (organization, company, etc.) Be European (incl. countries associated with the EU Framework programmes and in International cooperation partner countries (e.g. Israel, Russia, Switzerland and Turkey) Have its own accelerator R&D infrastructure(s) and agree to provide access to it/them for other TIARA members under conditions to be agreed upon Accept that each TIARA member may have restrictions for the use of its infrastructures Accept to report periodically on its activities related to TIARA Anders Unnervik

  15. Joining TIARA Which infrastructures to include from the beginning? Invite all institutes/organizations that have declared that they have infrastructures that would, in principle, be available for the members of TIARA, to reply in writing if they meet the criteria and if so, Indicate which of their infrastructures they propose to provide access to. As agreed in the WP2/GC meeting of 7/06/2013 a letter was prepared to be sent through the respective GC and/or WP3 representatives for the infrastructures. For each lab, the letter included a list of all infrastructures at the lab concerned. 41 letters have been sent Anders Unnervik

  16. Joining TIARA Which infrastructures to include from the beginning? Positive replies from the following institutes/labs (27) Denmark (1) ISA/Aarhus University Finland (1) University of Jyväskylä France (6) CEA Grenoble, CEA Saclay, CNRS Grenoble, CNRS Orsay, EcolePolytechnique, Synchrotron SOLEIL Germany (3) DESY, HZDR, GSI Netherlands (1) Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Poland (2)Wroclaw University of Technology, Warsaw University of Technology Slovenia(1) JozefStefan Institute Spain (5) CIEMAT, CMAM, CNA, ALBA, IFIC Sweden (2) The Svedberg Laboratory, Uppsala University UK (5)STFC Daresbury, STFC Swindon, STFC Oxfordshire, STFC Warrington, University of Strathclyde Anders Unnervik

  17. Initial TIARA infrastructures Which infrastructures to include from the beginning? In principle open for external users Approx 50% Anders Unnervik

  18. List of WP3 meetings Anders Unnervik * Attendance in person (attendance via phone or web)

  19. Anders Unnervik

More Related