70 likes | 163 Views
All JRA Session Inputs from JRA2. Clare Hooper (IT Innovation, JRA2 ). Re-Thinking Architecturally. Workshop on architecture, design Broaden thinking, bring fresh concepts and methods, identify implications Unconference -style open sessions. Goals:
E N D
All JRA SessionInputs from JRA2 Clare Hooper (IT Innovation, JRA2)
Re-Thinking Architecturally • Workshop on architecture, design • Broaden thinking, bring fresh concepts and methods, identify implications • Unconference-style open sessions. Goals: • Explore architecture and design from multi-disciplinary perspectives • Connect methods, methodologies, exemplars • Debate the architecture of the future internet • Identify best practices • Next steps: case studies, teaching, workshops, papers (C) 2014 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other EINS partners
Re-Thinking Architecturally: practical details • 22 to 26 September on Tiree, Scotland (a beautiful, remote island… with an airport!) • We invite representatives of each JRA • Working to balance diversity of disciplines! • Expressions of interest (max 300 words) to cjh@it-innovation.soton.ac.uk by 4 July • Name, job title, affiliation, discipline(s), motivation • Accommodation and full board provided; you need only arrange your travel (C) 2014 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other EINS partners
Methods, methodologies, use cases • We are seeking the above! • Case studies are very welcome • JRA4, 5, 6, 7, 8… • In JRA8 – energy distribution and social media to alter perceptions and behaviour…? (C) 2014 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other EINS partners
Recommendations to standard bodies • Assessment of the role of standardization in Internet Science • Foster translation of research results into emerging technologies • Gap analysis • what could be standardized out of Internet science results (not currently covered by these bodies) • which current (and/or foreseeable) activities of these standardization bodies could be “influenced” by Internet science activities • First version focused on technical standards (C) 2014 A-LBell and other EINS partners
Technical gaps & challenges • Could Internet science lead to "third architectural path" instead of those inspired from theory of utility and theory of component change ? • Social (more generally human science) dimension is often absent of technology standardization (should it be ?) • Economy often limited to cost/revenues, resource optimization, operation, of the infrastructure (wide-sense) • EINS perspective on net-neutrality, privacy, anonymity, etc ? • Technical standards keeps focus on electrical/electronic and computer systems ... what about hybrid systems such as • Nano-scale systems (e.g. programmable bio-chemical systems, neural nets, etc.) • Brain-related ICT ? • Extension of man-machine interface to e.g. brain-computer interface and intrinsic properties of the communication medium e.g., bio-chemical substrate • Etc. (C) 2014 A-LBell and other EINS partners
In search of standardisation inputs • Do you have… • Documents we can look at, • Topics we should address, • Pointers to relevant standards / regulatory bodies, or • Suggestions for our key audience? (And how to get their attention!) • We seek volunteers to review our text Remember: the last reknown universalist is H.Poincare (1854-1912) (C) 2014 A-LBell and other EINS partners