1 / 58

GMES and GEO an update

GMES and GEO an update. Mark Doherty European Space Agency. GMES. EO. Solutions. Public Policy. Needs. Needs. Governments, EU International Organisations Regulatory Bodies Industry General Public. Space Agencies Scientific Community Aerospace Industry Value Adding Industry.

mprosser
Download Presentation

GMES and GEO an update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GMES and GEOan update Mark DohertyEuropean Space Agency

  2. GMES EO Solutions Public Policy Needs Needs Governments, EU International Organisations Regulatory Bodies Industry General Public Space Agencies Scientific Community Aerospace Industry Value Adding Industry European Service & IT Industry

  3. ExapndingEurope’s Earth ObservationCapacity & Hertiage 2002 1995 1991 ENVISAT ERS 2 ERS 1 Oceans Sea Ice Cryosphere Land Surface Climatology + Global Ozone + Ocean Colour + Atmospheric Constituents

  4. 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 Number of Scientific Publications 5000 4000 Publications, Papers 10 000 3000 2000 1000 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 A World-wide Earth Observation User Community 7000 Users: 7000+ 6000 5000 Number of New Users 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 1992 1994 1996 2000 1998 Use of ERS &ENVisat data in 131 Countries

  5. Advancing Observation capability and Scientific Understanding • a wealth of science and application results • technological progress • consolidation of a large EO user community • basis for long-term environmental monitoring established (13+ years measurementS and data archives) • establishment of Europe and ESA’s contribution to global monitoring A European Success

  6. European Commission European Space Agency European and national user agencies European and national space organisations GMES mission statement Industry European independent access to timely and reliable policy-relevant information services on the status and the evolution of the Earth environment and on the security of its citizens at all scales from local to national and global R&D institutions …. and other partners

  7. GMES • Autonomous Global Monitoring Capability for Europe • Environment and Security • by 2008 • Multinational Partnership • GMES Partners • ESA-EC coordinated • GMES Service Element • FP5 / FP6 Projects • GMES Interim Report / Communique • GMES is Europe’s Contribution to EOS/GEO

  8. GMES Overall Schedule Initial Period Implementation Period 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 • By 2003: to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the current GMES servicing capacity and the needs for improvement [… Final Report of the Initial Period (2001-2003)] • 2004-2007: “implementation period” • By 2008: to establish a European capacity (autonomous and operational) for Global Monitoring of the Environment and Security.

  9. 5 GSC Working Groups GMES National Groups 15 FP5 thematic projects GMES Initial Period (2001-2003) GMES Steering Committee (GSC) dialogues analysis 10 ESA GSE projects 3rd - Athens, June 2003 2nd - Noordwijk, Jan 2003 4 cross-cutting assessments 1st - Brussels, June 2002 Projects Leaders GMES Forums Support Team Final Report Input Material Structured dialogues

  10. GMES Services Element (GSE) • ESA Programme dedicated to GMES • Approved: ESA Ministerial Council Nov 2001 • Earthwatch element • Deliver Operational Services • Support for environmental & security policies • Budget • 83 Meuro • 5 years

  11. GSE Programme sequence User Consultations consolidation full operationalisation New Services preparation servicereviews GMESforum 4 GSE ITT servicereviews servicereviews servicereviews contracts inputs to GMES report 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

  12. Select a first set of service-portfolios Perform all necessary consolidation activities 10+ Service-portfolios 10+ Policy-sectors 10+ Contracts 20 months each consolidated European E&S service-offering inputs to GMES initial report (2003) inputs to Earthwatch definition basis for full GMES service implementation GSE Service Consolidation: Scope

  13. Cardinal RequirementService Consolidation • Complete, clear & convincing answers • What information is needed? • What services can be provided? • What are the benefits for Europe’s Citizens? • Do the benefits justify the costs • Geographic scope • Global; continental; regional; national; local • Timescale • Present + 10 years

  14. Data & Methods • EO • In-situ / airborne • Socio-Economic • Models / Assimilation • Monitoring / Assessment / Forecasting

  15. Service Sustainability • Available • readily accessible to users when needed • now & in future • Reliable • consistently meet user-defined quality • & standards • Affordable • overall benefits justify Costs

  16. ESA GSE: GSE Services in consolidation • CoastWatchIntegrated Coastal zone management • ROSESReal time ocean services for oil spillmonitoring & coastal waters quality assessment • ICEMONSatellite-based sea-ice monitoring • Northern ViewArtic Environmental Management • Forest MonitoringForest monitoring for forestmanagement and Kyoto Reporting • SAGEProvision of advanced Geo-information for soil and inland water management • Risk-EOSEarth Observation based services for flood and fire risk management • TerraFirmaPan-European Ground Motion Hazard Information Service • GUSSatellite Earth Observation for urban environmental management • Food SecuritySatellite support services for Food Security early warning

  17. CEDRE NDF NSF IMR P of Gijon Puertos Estados Min. Fomento UKEA MCA BfG Min Mer. Marine FIMR FEI ROSES User Organizations

  18. IMR BSH RIKZ BRGM ETC-TE EUCC Coastwatch User Organizations

  19. DNV NPI RC (SMHI) FMA ICEMON User Organizations

  20. Env Can Parks Canada NW&E Int. Ice Patrol (Int) GRID Arendel (Int) Northern View User Organizations

  21. Yes but…How ?

  22. Research Partners System Developers Operational Service Providers Core Users Group Team Organisation Prime Contractor Project Manager Service Strategy Group Communication – Cooperation - Coordination

  23. The GSE Consolidation Scheme Science Review Service provision Service Negotiation Policy Foundations Review Promotion & Training Plans Global User Needs Directory Promotion & Training Reports Key User segment Profiles Validation Protocol Service prospectus Core User Needs Validation Reports Service prospectus appraisal SLA Portfolio Specifications Cost Benefit Analysis User Standards Handbook Service Portfolio Service Utility Reports Service Partnership protocol Service growth & enhancement Methods compendium Strategic Plan Operational scenarios Data needs & availability prospectus data access agreements data sources Inventory System Standards Guidelines Infrastructure systems analysis precursor systems Inventory

  24. ESA GSE: Consolidation schedule C o L O C A T I O N GSE Orientation co-location GMES 2004-2008 inputs co-location GSE Programme Review co-location J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N P ROGRES S MT S KO PM PM PM PM PM FR contracts phase 1 contracts phase 2

  25. Distribution of Roles in GSE teams User Organisations Service Providers System Developers Research Organisations Expert Consultants 175 organisation in 238 different roles

  26. Nature of User Organisations in GSE International National Sub-National Local Private Sector

  27. Nature of User Organisations in GSE International National Sub-National Local Private Sector

  28. 6th Framework Programme2002-2006 Focussing and integrating Community Research Contribution to GMES

  29. What’s Next ?

  30. New GSE Services in consolidation • Food Security • Risk-EOS • TerraFirma • Urban Services • Forest Monitoring • SAGE • CoastWatch • ROSES • ICEMON • Northern View • RESPOND (Humanitarian Aid) • PROMOTE (Atmospheric compositon)

  31. Scaling up GSE Services • Rationalization service-portfolios • Merging supply teams • Gaining operational acceptance • Service validation • Improving performance & benefits • Addressing sustainability

  32. GSE co-location week 3(Frascati May 03-07) Based on phase 1 experience (Documented user-feedback) • Critical review of services • User federation, communities & leadership • Supply-side synergies • Service-level agreements, service partnership agreements • Service validation, standards, certification… • Infrastructure & Data Needs • Benefits • Sustainability Critical Inputs for next phase of GSE 2005-2007

  33. Key questions… • What makes a GMES Service a “GMES Service” • Do we have a complete view of user needs & the user base for GMES Services • How strong is the user demand, how cohesive is the user base ? • Organize around the users or around the supply ? Different answers => different implementation approach

  34. GMES Interim ReportRecommendations Way forward 2004-2008 • Establish GMES Organizational Framework • Mechanisms for permanent dialogue with Users • Start to implement Priority Services • Strategy on GMES Data & Information • Capacity & interfaces for improved access • Develop required space capabilities (2008) • Assess & develop relevant in-situ capabilities • Organize & fund Underpinning RTD activities • Develop International partnership • Appropriate funding mechanisms

  35. Continuity of Observations • Sine-qua-non constraint, • stated repeatedly by many end-user organizations participating in the GMES Service Element, • They cannot today move towards greater reliance on satellite-based surveillance (SAR or otherwise), without having an assurance of effective continuity of the observation data sources in the future.

  36. GMES Space ComponentDrivers for Observations continuity2008 onwards… • C-Band SAR • Ocean, Ice, Geohazards (INSAR) • Continuity ERS, ASAR observations • Medium-res multispectral • SPOT, Landsat class observations • Ocean-colour / Radar Altimetry • MERIS, MODIS class • ERS RA, RA-2 class • LEO Atmospheric Monitoring • Stratosphere, profiles, • Continiuity GOMOS, MIPAS, Scia limb • GEO Atmospheric Monitoring • Pollution, hi-res temporal & spatial

  37. ESRIN Mark Dohertry Fen 2004 ESA EO Programmes

  38. Group on Earth Observations(GEO)

  39. Group on Earth bservations Earth Observation Summit U.S. Department of State, Washington DC July 31, 2003

  40. Group on Earth bservations The Earth Observation Summit Washington DC, July 31, 2003 • The Summit represented a high level governmental/political commitment to move toward a comprehensive, coordinated, global network: • Issued declaration to support this concept • Launched development of 10-year implementation plan • Established the ad hoc intergovernmental Group on Earth Observations (GEO) with 4 Co-Chairs: • U.S. – Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher Jr., Administrator National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) • 2) EC – Director General Achilleas Mitsos Directorate General for Research • 3) Japan – Mr. Akio Yuki, Deputy Minister, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) • 4) South Africa – Dr. Rob Adam, Director-General, Department of Science and Technology

  41. Group on Earth bservations EO Summit Declaration • Affirmed need for timely, quality, long-term, global information as a basis for sound decision making. • Recognized need to support: • Comprehensive, coordinated, sustained Earth observation system or systems; • Coordinated effort to address capacity-building needs related to Earth obs; • Exchange of observations in a full and open manner with minimum time delay and minimum cost; and • Preparation of a 10-year Implementation Plan, building on existing systems and initiatives • Framework for Tokyo ministerial, April or May 2004 • 10-year plan for Brussels ministerial in late 2004. • Established ad hoc Group on Earth Observations (GEO) to develop Plan • Invited other governments to join.

  42. Argentina Australia Belize Brazil Canada China Denmark Egypt European Commission France Gabon Germany India Ireland Israel Italy Japan Kazakhstan Mexico Morocco Netherlands New Zealand Norway Republic of Congo Republic of Korea Russian Federation South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Thailand Ukraine United Kingdom United States Group on Earth bservations Member Governments

  43. Group on Earth bservations Participating International Organizations • Central American Commission for the Environment and Development (SICA/CCAD) • Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) • European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) • European Space Agency (ESA) • European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) • Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) • Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) • Global Terrestrial Observing System (GTOS) • Integrated Global Observing Strategy Partnership (IGOS-P) • Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) • International Agency for the Development of Environmental Information (ADIE) • International Council for Science (ICSU) • International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) • International Group of Funding Agencies for Global Change Research (IGFA) • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) • World Bank (IBRD) • World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) • World Meteorological Organization (WMO)

  44. Group on Earth bservations GEO Structure GEO US, EC, Japan, South Africa (Co-Chairs) Architecture Subgroup GEO Secretariat (US providing AdministrativeSecretariat, with support from other countries and international organizations) Capacity Building Subgroup Data Utilization Subgroup International Cooperation Subgroup User Requirements and Outreach Subgroup

  45. Group on Earth bservations Ecosystems Atmosphere Climate Disasters Health Land Earth Observation Elements Ocean

  46. Group on Earth bservations National Requirements Earth Observation Components GEO International Requirements GEO Subgroups GEO Secretariat EarthObservation10-year Implementation Plan Earth ObservationSummit II, III

  47. Group on Earth bservations Key GEO Documents • Framework Document • (April 2004) • GEO Report • (April 2004) • Implementation Plan (10 yr) • (V1: Oct 2004; V2: Jan 2005; Final: Feb 2005 )

  48. Group on Earth bservations Framework and Plan Development • GEO Members & Participant Organizations provide inputs via Subgroups • GEO Subgroups provide draft chapters to the GEO Secretariat • GEO Secretariat provides draft I&P chapters and way forward • Framework will be basis for 10-year Plan • GEO Meetings review and approve draft chapters for Framework and 10-year Plan

  49. Group on Earth bservations GEOSSImplementation Plan Development GEO II Work review Baveno Nov 2003 Subgroups & Secretariat compose Draft Framework Doc Earth Obs Summit I and GEO I - UNITED STATES - Draft Framework Document components GEO III Draft Framework Doc Subgroup reports. - S.AFRICA Feb 2004- Establishes Architecture Subgroup GEO Secretariat Earth Obs Summit II & GEO IV GEO Report Framework Document for approval - JAPAN April 2004- Data Utilization Subgroup Earth Obs Summit III GEOSS Implementation Plan for Approval by EOS - Europe 2005 - Capacity Building Subgroup Drafting GEOSS Implementation Plan Task team GEO sun-groups User Requirements & Outreach Subgroup GEO VI GEOSS Implementation Plan. Europe Feb2005 GEO V GEOSS Implementation Plan V1 - Oct 2004- Int’l Cooperation Subgroup Governments Review GEOSS Implementation Plan

  50. Group on Earth bservations Societal Benefits (roadmap) • Reducing loss of life and property from natural and human-induced disasters • Understanding environmental factors affecting human health and well being • Understanding environmental factors affecting human health and well being • Improving management of energy resources • Understanding, assessing, predicting, mitigating, and adapting to climate variability and change • Understanding, assessing, predicting, mitigating, and adapting to climate variability and change • Improving weather information, forecasting, and warning • Supporting sustainable agriculture and combating desertification • Understanding, monitoring, and conserving biodiversity

More Related