1 / 11

Special education

Program Evaluation Plan Report Board of Education Meeting June 14, 2012. Special education. Purpose of the Program. IDEA mandates school districts provide a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) for students with disabilities.

naeva
Download Presentation

Special education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Program Evaluation Plan Report Board of Education Meeting June 14, 2012 Special education

  2. Purpose of the Program • IDEA mandates school districts provide a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) for students with disabilities. • FAPE is based on the child’s needs and strengths to maximize personal potential. • Through the IEP process all stakeholders participate in the development of an individualized program for the child to support him/her in maximizing potential.

  3. Service Delivery Model • Through the Special Education process students are referred, evaluated, and determined eligible for IDEA services. • If determined eligible, an IEP is developed. • Services are designed to meet individual students’ needs. • Special Education services range from the least restrictive placement (Class within a Class) to the most restrictive placement (Self-Contained/Separate Day School).

  4. Progress Toward Previous Program Goal GOAL #1: To increase compliance with all IDEA federal and state regulations to 100%. RESULTS: The State of Missouri provides district results based on data collected the previous year. All data reflects information from the 2010-2011 school year. For the 2010-2011 year, DESE rated 12 of the 20 indicators as non-applicable for all districts. Therefore, no data was available for 12 of the indicators. For the remaining 8 indicators, 5 ½ were met; 2 ½ were unmet. Noteworthy to mention, on 2 of the indicators unmet, Park Hill did not meet the federal targets, but significantly exceeded state averages.

  5. Progress Toward Previous Program Goal GOAL #2: All students on IEPs are afforded a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). RESULTS: • Given a random sample of 80 student IEPs, 94% of the IEPs reviewed contained documentation of progress toward meeting individual IEP goals. • The Special Education Department is in process of developing a Standards Based Goal Bank. This will be completed by July 1, 2012.

  6. Progress Toward Previous Program Goal (continued) RESULTS: 3) Due to the extensive nature of assistive technology evaluations, the district moved away from a formal evaluation process and adopted an alternative model for such determination This new model more appropriately identifies the students’ assistive technology needs and accomplishes the end result in a timely manner. 4) The number of business partnerships and worksites available for post-secondary activities has increased from approximately to now more than 20 worksites in the community.

  7. DEPLOYMENT LEVEL: Services are well deployed, although deployment may vary in some areas or schools.

  8. Future Program Goals to be Evaluated • Goal 1: To increase compliance with all IDEA federal and state regulations to 100%. • Goal 2: All students on IEPs are afforded a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE).

  9. Plan for Evaluation Measurable Outcomes • Goal 1: • Special Education MSIP 5 review results will indicate 100% compliance. • Goal 2: • Given a random sample, 100% of IEP math and reading goals will be aligned with district grading standards. • Expand Professional Development opportunities specific to meeting the needs of students with disabilities. • Increase Assistive Technology resources available to students and staff by using the proceeds from Sophie’s Run.

  10. Plan for Evaluation (continued) Data Collection Methods • Document reviews • Surveys and questionnaires • Sophie’s Run

  11. Next Evaluation Report in June 2013 Special Education

More Related