140 likes | 377 Views
2003 ITRS Test Chapter. December 2003 Don Edenfeld Test ITWG Chair Intel Corporation. Acknowledgements. ITWG Members
E N D
2003 ITRS Test Chapter December 2003 Don Edenfeld Test ITWG Chair Intel Corporation
Acknowledgements • ITWG Members • Rochit Rajsuman (Advantest), Yi Cai (Agere), Bill Ortner (Agere), Rob Aitken (Artisan), Atul Goel (Agilent), Peter Maxwell (Agilent), Bernd Koenemann (Cadence), Anne Gattiker (IBM), Phil Nigh (IBM), Fred Taber (IBM), Jody Van Horn (IBM), Don Wheater (IBM), Peter Muhmenthaler (Infineon), Phil Burlison (Inoys), Roger Barth (Intel), Don Edenfeld (Intel), Mike Rodgers (Intel), Chad Wren (Intel), Yasumasa Nishimura (Renesas), Jay Bedsole (Motorola), Paul Roddy (Motorola), Don Van Overloop (Motorola), Toshinobu Ono (NEC), Burnie West (NPTest), Bill Price (Philips), Rene Segers (Philips), Tom Williams (Synopsys), Lee Song (Teradyne), Yervant Zorian (Virage) • Contributors • Davide Appello (ST Microelectronics), John Johnson (Intel), John Matthias (Agere), Lynn Schmidt (Agilent), Marc Loranger (Credence), Michael Lee (TSMC), Rudy Garcia (NPTest), Bernd Laquai (Agilent), Sunil Jain (Intel), Udaya Natarajan (Intel), Mike Green (Motorola), Charles Ross (Motorola), John Ferrario (IBM), Dennis Eaton (Agilent), Paul Nesrsta (Rel Inc), Rich Karr (TI), Jim Rhodes (Unisys), Ichiro Fujishiro (Yamaichi), Gordon Cowan (High Rel), Ken Heiman (MCC), Dave Noddin (3M), Herve Deshayes (ST Micro), Dick McClelland (Philips), Carl Buck (Aehr Test), Rafiq Hussain (AMD), Dan Weinstein (Intel), Bob Totorica (Micron), Bob Zacharis (Pycon), John Hartstein (Wells-CTI), Takashi Aikyo, Kenichi Anzou, Kouichi Eguchi, Satoshi Fukumoto, Kazumi Hatayama, Toshinori Inoshita, Shinji Mori, Mitsuyasu Ohta, Akira Ooishi, Masayuki Sato, Hidefumi Toda, Masanori Ushikubo, Osamu Yamada, Chip Cotton (Intel), Dan Sech (Intel), Brett Casey (Intel), Sematech Product Analysis Forum (Larry Wagner (IT), Dave Vallett (IBM)), Stefan Eichenberger (Philips), Ted Lundquist (NPtest), HankWalker (TX A&M), Bob Madge (LSI Logic), Camelia Hora (Philips Research), Maurice Lousberg (Philips Research) Many Thanks!
2003 ITRS Test Chapter Revision • Trends described in 2001 have held true • High speed interfaces are appearing in a broad range of applications in many market segments • SOC and SIP dominate new designs • Low cost, targeted test platforms emerging • 2003 Test Chapter focuses on key challenges • Less emphasis on evolutionary trending • Increased effort to identify, define, and discuss the key challenges facing test
Chapter Content Additions • Test Technology Requirements • Test and Yield Learning • Physical Failure Analysis • Software-Based Diagnosis and Signature Analysis • Defects and Failure Mechanisms • Reliability Technology Requirements • IDDQ Testing • Burn-In Requirements • Test Handler and Prober Technology Requirements • Test Handlers • Wafer Probers • Device Interface Technology Requirements • Probe Cards
2003 Key Challenges • High Speed Device Interfaces • Highly Integrated Designs, SOCs, & SIPs • Reliability Screens • Manufacturing Test Cost Reduction • Failure Analysis and Diagnosis • Automated Test Program Generation (not ATPG!) • Modeling and Simulation
High Speed Serial Interfaces • Penetration of high speed interfaces into new designs is increasing dramatically • Leading edge communications devices data rate trend slowing, but … • High speed links (1.5 to 4 Gbps, 10s to 100s) dropping into many other product types / business segments / formerly plain vanilla digital products • Loopback alone may not be sufficient to achieve needed product quality • Transaction / event driven protocols inconsistent with stored response ATE / mfg test • Test and DFT methods must be developed to enable development and production test of these products
SOC and SIP • Customer requirements for form factor and power consumption are driving a significant increase in design integration levels • Test complexity will increase dramatically with the combination of different classes of circuits on single die or within a single package • Disciplined, structured DFT is a requirement to reduce test complexity • Increased focus on KGD and sub-assembly test driven by cost for SIP • Mems, opticals, and other emerging or newly integrated to SIP devices • SIP physical FA is much more difficult, test diagnostics will be critical • Manufacturing repair may be required for non-stacked die SIPs
Reliability Screens Run Out of Gas • Critical need for development of new techniques for acceleration of latent defects • Burn-in methods limited by thermal runaway • Lowered use voltages limits voltage stress opportunity • Difficulty of determining Iddq signal versus “normal” leakage current noise • New materials • Rate of introduction increasing: Cu, low k, high k, SiGe • Critical interactions of new materials increasing (Cu / low k) • Increasing mechanical and thermal sensitivities
$ NRE Costs $ DFT design and validation $ Test development $ Device Costs $ Die area increase $ Yield loss $ Work-Cell Cost $ Building Capital $ People $ Consumables $ Loadboards, DUT interface $ Capital Equipment Depreciation of: $ Test Equipment $ Handler/Prober Work-Cell Good Units Shipped Untested Units • Goal is to optimize product cost • Must strike a balance between cost of design, manufacture, and test UPH/$M Effectiveness Measure Rejected Units The Overall Cost of Test
Failure Analysis and Diagnosis • Enhanced automated software diagnostic capabilities to improve physical failure analysis ROI • Characterization capabilities must identify, locate, and distinguish individual defect types • Increased accuracy and throughput (days to hours) • Failure analysis methods for analog devices must be developed • DFT is essential to localize failures • Improve efficiency and reduce design complexities associated with test • Defect types and behavior will continue to evolve with advances in fabrication process technology • Fundamental research in existing and novel fault models to address emerging defects will be required
Automated Test Program Generation • Tools for ATE software and test program generation are needed to decrease test development effort and improve time to market • Automated design to manufacturing test program flow • Correct by construction (pre-silicon) • Interoperability standards (STIL, CTL, etc) • Enable test content portability among test platforms • ATE S/W operating environment standards • Direct impact on time to market and product development cost • Driven by product complexity and shorter product cycles
Modeling and Simulation • Signal Integrity and Power Delivery • High speed signals, increasing analog content, and high power designs drive more rigorous interface design • Modeling of the complete path • Device I/O • Probe or Package + Socket • ATE interface hardware • ATE instrumentation or power supply
2004 Plans • Refine data presented in 2003 • Address any required clarification • Focus on 2003 key challenges and 2004 additions • Device Interfaces - Sockets (Test and Burn-in) • Reliability Methods • High Speed Interfaces • Automated Test Program Generation
How can we improve manageability of the divergence between validation and manufacturing equipment? Can ATE instruments catch up and keep up with high speed serial performance trends? Can DFT mitigate analog test cost as it does in the digital domain? What is the cost and capability optimal SOC test approach? What happens when high speed serial interfaces become buses? How can we make test of complex SIP designs more cost effective? Will market dynamics justify development of next generation functional test capabilities? Can DFT and BIST mitigate the mixed signal tester capability treadmill? What other opportunities exist? Will increasing test data volume lead to increased focus on Logic BIST architectures? What are the other solutions?