1 / 16

Developing a Planning Process Across Organizational Boundaries Dr. Joe DiRenzo LT Fred Bertsch

Developing a Planning Process Across Organizational Boundaries Dr. Joe DiRenzo LT Fred Bertsch USCG Atlantic Area 18 March 2008. Objectives & Concepts. Education Objectives for Standard Operational Planning Process (SOPP): Develop knowledge and comprehension of SOPP in CG planners

Download Presentation

Developing a Planning Process Across Organizational Boundaries Dr. Joe DiRenzo LT Fred Bertsch

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing a Planning Process Across Organizational Boundaries Dr. Joe DiRenzo LT Fred Bertsch USCG Atlantic Area 18 March 2008

  2. Objectives & Concepts • Education Objectives for Standard Operational Planning Process (SOPP): • Develop knowledge and comprehension of SOPP in CG planners • Prepare and analyze SOPP products and timelines • Evaluate and formulate improvements to SOPP • Promote collection and analysis of data • Organize and manage an operational planning community • Concepts: • Connect strategic intent to mission execution • Incorporation of Effects Based Operations (EBO) • Foster an operational planning community • Unite diverse communities

  3. CG Planning Issues • No formal operational planning existed in CG • Planning community consisted of Contingency and Exercise Planners. • Mission Planning Guidance consisted of limited direction for select law enforcement missions

  4. CG Planning Issues • Diverse communities and missions (Prevention and Response) have different approaches to planning. • No connection of strategic intent to operational planning direction and mission execution. • Could not translate resource usage to outcomes.

  5. Operational Planning • Development and Introduction of new planning process • Standard Operational Planning Process • Connect strategic intent to mission execution • Incorporation of Effects Based Operations • Change of emphasis and focus • Open up alternatives

  6. Operational Planning • Fostering an Operational Planning Community • Identifying and Assigning Roles • Quarterly Meetings • Uniting Diverse Communities • Incorporating Prevention and Response into one process • Combining Contingency and Operational Planning

  7. Need for Education • New Process • New Approach • Conflicting Ideas and stovepipes • New Personnel • Organizational Change

  8. Education Efforts • Quarterly Meetings • Electronic Training Materials • Traveling Training • Use of outside courses • Inclusion in existing courses • Development of stand-alone course

  9. Quarterly Meetings • Foster community development • Participation by Planners, Response, Prevention, etc. • Conducts Training of Process and Approach • Discusses upcoming stages of Standard Operational Planning Process • Effects changes to process for improvement • Rotating Locations • Brought visibility to different locations • Allowed additional personnel to attend

  10. Electronic Training Materials • SOPP Microsite • Central location for all documents • Training Material • Briefs for entire process • Briefs for products/stages • Briefs for lessons learned • Tailored material from different levels • Instruction and Guide • COMDT INST 3240.2 (series) • Detailed Process Guide that is flexible

  11. Traveling Training • Training available for all levels • Subject Matter Experts provide training to lower levels • Coordinated training sessions with quarterly planning efforts • Lessons Learned Conference • Prototype members provide feedback and lesson learned for newly involved members • Informational Briefs • Presentation of efforts to Accession Points (CG Academy, OSC, etc.) • Briefs to senior levels on progress

  12. Outside Courses • Effects Based Operations Training • Received on-site training from Joint Forces Staff College • Joint Forces Staff College Staff members facilitated workshop conference • Homeland Security Planners Courses • Use of Joint Forces Staff College course to develop operational planners • Develops and fosters a planning community

  13. Existing Courses • Inclusion of SOPP at the Coast Guard Academy • Introduces planning at officer accession points • Ensures visibility of process to all officer entering the field • Inclusion of Op Planning in PCO/PXO course • Ensures perspective commanding officers/executive officers are aware of necessity and importance of Operational Planning. • Provides overview of process and requirements. • Inclusion of SOPP into other efforts • Leadership Development Center, Chiefs Academy, etc.

  14. Stand-alone Course • Development in Process • Currently expanding Contingency Planning Course to include operation planning • Needs to be developed into an individual course • Conducting Analysis of training needs and requirements • Using knowledge and expertise gained from similar courses and efforts

  15. Results • Successfully prototyped a new Standard Operational Planning Process which: • can use effects based operation • combined prevention and response direction into one document • facilitates visibility and communication • Fostering an Operational Planning Community • Designated personnel assigned roles and responsibility • Continual interaction and training efforts • Combining Contingency and Operational Planners efforts • Leading to an Organizational Change

  16. Questions? Dr. Joe DiRenzo Deputy Operations Planning and Analysis (Axo) (757) 398-6695 LT Fred Bertsch Operations Planning Analyst (Axo) (757) 398-6536

More Related