1 / 27

Special Education Reform

Strategic Priorities: Changes for Special Education Reform. Accurate identification and appropriate assignment of servicesIntegration of students with disabilitiesAccess to the general curriculum and standards for academic achievementKnowledgeable and qualified staffMonitoring of performance ind

niabi
Download Presentation

Special Education Reform

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Special Education Reform

    2. Strategic Priorities: Changes for Special Education Reform Accurate identification and appropriate assignment of services Integration of students with disabilities Access to the general curriculum and standards for academic achievement Knowledgeable and qualified staff Monitoring of performance indicators and accountability for results

    3. What is the Modified Consent Decree? Court order to comply with the federal law (IDEA) 18 Outcome areas Specific outcomes/results completed by 2006 Interim benchmarks by years: 2004, 2005, 2006 Annual Plans with action steps and responsible staff Central Local District School

    4. What is the Modified Consent Decree? Data Driven—reliant on accurate data MCD Data Review Teams Central Local District School School/Local District progress measured at regular intervals from data—accountability Oversight by the Independent Monitor Authority of Chief Executive of Special Education

    5. Role of the Independent Monitor Approve an Annual Plan submitted by the District Verify the accuracy of the District’s data used to measure District’s performance Make determinations of District’s achievement of outcomes Order the District to comply with decisions made by Independent Monitor

    6. Modified Consent Decree Year One Progress Report Jay Alleman, Administrative Coordinator Office of the Independent Monitor

    7. Response to the Modified Consent Decree Year One Progress Report Roy Romer, Superintendent Los Angeles Unified School District

    8. Superintendent’s Annual Report to the Board of Education, 2003-2004 Division of Special Education

    9. Organization of the Report Section I Statistical Information Section II Compliance with Special Education Laws, 2003-2004 Section III Completion of 2003-2004 Annual Plan Benchmarks and Maintenance of Effort Goals, MCD Section IV Other Achievements Section V Summary Budget

    10. Section I: Statistical Information

    11. Section II: Compliance with Special Education Laws, 2003-2004 2003/2004 Monitoring Review Process Three activities: District Validation Review (DVR) Green Team Review (GTR) California Department of Education Review

    12. District Validation Review Elements Team Composition (6 member team, includes parent representation) Standardized forms Focus of review Compliance with District procedures

    13. District Validation Review Elements Student records review Administrative and staff interviews Classroom observations Documentation review Analysis of school site data Summary report Follow-up monitoring

    14. District Validation Review Findings (Local Districts B and D) 2003-2004 Least Restrictive Environment Items 86% compliant Secondary Transition Items 95% compliant Individual Education Program (IEP Timelines Items) 89% compliant English Language Learners Items 94% compliant Procedural Rights and Safeguards Items 92% compliant

    15. Green Team Review Elements Team Composition Local District personnel Division of Special Education Personnel Standardized forms Random student records review Interviews Classroom visitations Data review Report of results

    16. Green Team Review Findings Nine schools reviewed in 2003-2004 School and District Leadership 73% “evident” or “in progress” Curriculum, Instruction & Professional Development 91% “evident” or “in progress” Classroom and School Assessment 67% “evident” or “in progress” School Climate, Culture and Communication 78% “evident” or “in progress”

    17. CDE Site Review Elements Team Composition - 2 team members (1 CDE Consultant and 1 Special Education Compliance Specialist) Standardized forms Student record review

    18. CDE Site Review Elements Administrative and staff review Classroom observation Verification of services; speech and language and mental health Summary report of findings

    19. CDE Records Review Findings Review 27 schools Elementary Middle High schools Average score of record reviews conducted by CDE ranged from 94% to 99% compliant

    20. Closure of Outstanding Noncompliance and Systemic Issues, 2000-2004 “Establishing this yearly review of tangible evidence and provided documented assurance by LAUSD…ensures that students with special needs and their parents will receive the educational support needed to access state educational standards and receive educational benefit from their work.”

    21. Closure of Outstanding Noncompliance and Systemic Issues, 2000-2004 “The summary report along with its eight (8) addendums enabled CDE/SED to bring to closure all the reporting that CDE requested during this four year time frame.” Alice Parker Deputy Superintendent, Director CDE, Special Education Division November 16, 2004

    22. Section IV: Other Achievements Welligent System Provide all decision-makers timely, accurate date regarding students with disabilities Measure District progress for compliance with State and Federal law and Consent Decree

    23. Section IV: Other Achievements Welligent System Accomplishments Implemented to some level in all regular schools within 12 months Trained over 8,000 users on IEP system Trained over 3,000 service providers Typically more than 1,000 concurrent users logged in during normal working hours HP system retired Daily increasing meaningful, accurate data

    24. Section IV: Other Achievements Literacy Institute Assist teacher in providing access for all students to the core curriculum Team from each school awarded a LRE mini-grant during 2002-2003 Focus on site planning activities for implementing LRE programs LRE Mini-grants continued in 2003-2004

    25. Section IV: Other Achievements Informal Dispute Resolution IEP disputes minimized when developed through meaningful, informed participation of all IEP team members IEP dispute represents a difference of opinion that can be resolved through open communication Resolution of disputes best achieved by those who know/work with child Local site staff should be empowered to resolve disputes Formal due process should be last resort

    26. Section IV: Other Achievements Early Intervention and Prevention Academically at-risk students provide structured, systemic academic intervention programs Needs addressed in early grades (K, 1, 2) and early in English literacy development Students with reading difficulties referred for special education only after participation in District’s intervention program progress assessed and monitored, responses to provided interventions monitored

    27. Section IV: Other Achievements LRE Initiative Designed to systemically increase opportunities for students with disabilities to be educated in less restrictive environments in neighborhood schools Learning supports and services that ensure their successful education 2002-2003 LRE Task Force (general and special educators) developed Districtwide plan for integration of general and special education students Implementation of instructional interventions and strategies for effective LRE practices continued throughout 2003-2004

    28. 2004-2005 Progress to Date Reorganization – Support Units Welligent Professional Development Informal Dispute Resolution Prevention and Reading First Behavior Least Restrictive Environment MCD Review Teams and targeted assistance

More Related