1 / 17

Foothill College

Foothill College. Projected Fiscal & Staffing Plan 2010-2011. Dr. Shirley Treanor Vice President, Educational Resources and Instruction. District Fiscal Plan. District-wide 2010/11 budget used these broad objectives: Bring the operating revenue & expense into balance for the 10/11 year

olinda
Download Presentation

Foothill College

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Foothill College Projected Fiscal & Staffing Plan 2010-2011 Dr. Shirley Treanor Vice President, Educational Resources and Instruction

  2. District Fiscal Plan District-wide 2010/11 budget used these broad objectives: • Bring the operating revenue & expense into balance for the 10/11 year • Preserve student access & support services as much as possible • Set aside “escrow II” & deferment 1 funds to carry positions to June 2010. • Maintain a “stability fund” to guard against last minute revenue reductions imposed by the state • Anticipate further state revenue reductions in the 11/12 fiscal year – still unknown???

  3. Foothill’s Budget • 85% of our budget is linked to salaries. • Due to prudent spending last year Foothill had a $4.1 mi carry over… $2 mi was undesignated. • Divisions were allowed to keep their B Budget carry over. • B-Budgets were fully restored to their pre 2009-10 allocations • Measure C funding was used for Construction, Furniture, Fixtures, Equipment, and Computers • Continue with conservative spending

  4. Review of the District’s 6/30/10 Ending Balance The 6/30/10 ending balance was $36,807,938 Restricted: • $9,890,000 District’s budgeted 5% reserves Designated: • $12,777,756 for college and Central Services carryover • $ 600,333 for encumbrances carryover • $ 2,156,246 for district-wide carryover (negotiated contract items, trustee election costs for 2011, Parcel Tax election costs for 2010, EIS backfill, etc.) • $3,432,954 Deferment I and Escrow II • $7,950,649 Net Stability Fund

  5. Plans for Use of Stability Fund in 2010/11 • In December the Board of Trustees determined that all escrow and deferment I positions remaining would be carried into the ongoing funding process. • Waiting to hear from Sacramento re: mid year cuts, etc.

  6. District Income & Expense Projections Expected Income (ongoing) $181,156,493 Expenses (ongoing) $182,273,451 District Revenue less Expenses ($1,116,958) Anticipate that we will have one time funds available in our ending balance to cover deficit.

  7. Major Revenue Assumptions • Zero COLA • Workload reduction sustained (3.39%) ???? • Growth 2.21 … would be more like restoration • Potential growth non-resident FTES ≈ $600,000 • Deficit factor applied to state apportionment funds (1%) • District Enrollment estimated at 36,168 FTES

  8. Assumptions, continued FHDA 2010/11 Productivity & Enrollment 36,168 total FTES Projection • FTES from regular on-campus and off-campus programs is budgeted at 35,125 FTES and productivity of 546 ... not sure we’ll make this target. • In addition, Contract Instruction programs at Foothill and Job Corps at De Anza was targeted to generate an additional 1,043 FTES … not sure we’ll make this target?

  9. Chart on Foothill-De Anza Enrollment

  10. Major Variables for Expense& Revenue Projections • Legislative had a problem submitting a real balanced state budget to the governor • Property tax deficit factor – still unclear. • Productivity seems to be decreasing due to both Banner & Title V requirements … as well as our targeted decreases in SE, PE and Performing Arts Alliance Program (PAA). • Growth over productivity was our goal this Winter due to low Fall and Summer enrollment numbers.

  11. General Outlook for Fiscal Year 2011/12 2011/12 is expected to be challenging for the following reasons: • State budget is still not balanced … tuition increases? Categorical cuts remain? • Our medical benefits costs may increase and will be paid with one-time funds in 2010/11 and 2011/12 • Enrollment & Productivity uncertainty

  12. Summary on Fiscal Plan Need to verify Banner and Title V requirements for apportionment collection. Conservative spending.

  13. Foothill College Staffing Plan 2010-2011

  14. Foothill Staffing • Current Staffing (Budgeted) • Faculty (FT) 218 • Faculty (PT) 241 • Classified Staff (FT) 135 • Classified Staff (PT) 6 • Managers 25 • Supervisors 6

  15. Foothill Staffing Plan • Escrow 2 and Deferment 1 positions are now in ongoing budget. • Faculty hiring prioritization • Based upon program reviews • PaRC’s recommendations • State’s guiding principle to prioritize Transfer, Basic Skills and Career Programs • Meeting needs of under-represented students

  16. Foothill Staffing Plan • Currently recruiting for 11 faculty • Counseling • ESL • Anthropology • Chemistry • Library Director • English • History* • Physics/Engineering* • Mathematics* • Child Development* • Music Technology*

  17. Foothill Staffing Plan • Need to meet FON (Full Time Faculty Obligation Number) • Last Year the District just met it’s obligation of 503 • If not all positions are hired, we would fall below our new obligation of 518 … therefore, Foothill may be able to hire 4 more Faculty (start date Fall 2011) • New Faculty searches may go up to 15.

More Related