1 / 14

Muon news from Upgrades Week - I

Muon news from Upgrades Week - I. GIF++: more coordination of planning needed Among CMS muon systems (shadowing?), in CMS, and LHC-wide CF4 as a greenhouse gas (GWP = 7390, lifetime 50000 yrs) GEMs: define baseline without CF4 (poorer timing) CSC: investigate R&D for eliminating CF4 (CF3I??)

orsin
Download Presentation

Muon news from Upgrades Week - I

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Muon news from Upgrades Week - I • GIF++: more coordination of planning needed • Among CMS muon systems (shadowing?), in CMS, and LHC-wide • CF4 as a greenhouse gas (GWP = 7390, lifetime 50000 yrs) • GEMs: define baseline without CF4 (poorer timing) • CSC: investigate R&D for eliminating CF4 (CF3I??) • CSCs and L1 trigger latency • Tracker front-end hits an important boundary at 12.5 us • CSC simulations at 10, 20 us: should repeat at 12.5 us; then verify; can we live with these results (versus huge replacement program)? • RE3/1, RE4/1: bakelite RPC only need minor improvements • Improvement factors only ~ 2 to 4 required • No justification for ~100 ps timing given Tracker points to vertex • Need to check that RPC Splitter links (GOL) are compatible with upgraded L1 Forward Muon Track Finder

  2. Muon news from Upgrades Week - II • Muon simulation • First plot showing ME0 background rates (well, fluxes) • Expected hit rates ~100 kHz/cm2 (10-3 of rate capability) • More attention needed for neutron, photon, charged background rates • In order to understand existing detectors • In order to build confidence in simulation for ME0 particularly • Comparisons of data (CSC, RPC, DT) hit rates to each other • Compare data hit rates to FLUKA and GEANT ME-0 ME-1/1

  3. Muon news from Upgrades Week - III • Importance of new muon detectors for L1 trigger not well understood with functional Track Trigger • L1 momentum supplied by Tracker • Muon system used primarily for pointing to the Tracker • What needs to be understood: • Rate limits for muon-only tracks to matching? • Muon system matching accuracy needed? • How good is TT efficiency at high eta? • Is high-eta TT simulation now stable? • Difference between Associative Memory (AM) versus FPGA designs for TT?

  4. Muon news from Upgrades Week - IV • Challenge from spokesperson on physics of muon upgrade • See following slide – need workshop <June but when? • Involve Upgrade Performance Studies group, muon POG, muon DPG, and simulation teams

  5. Some considerations from this week: muons From CB meeting: Tiziano • We need to beef up the physics case • In the near future we will need to have a clear view of how to reconcile the apparently parallel threads on the choices/options for muon upgrade description in the TP for Phase 2 and the GE1/1 ‘project’ that will reach “TDR level” by the fall • We should probably plan for a dedicated workshop on this CMS Upgrade week , T. Camporesi

  6. Future Meetings 1. Phase 2 TP: next update for reader group • Contact group meets Thursdays, next release planned April 17 2. Costing: new estimate needed for Management by April 31 • Fabrizio will discuss about that next 3. Dedicated meeting on measured & Phase 2 background rates • Week of April 22-25 after AGR? • Summarize at GMM of April 28? 4. Workshop on “Physics of the Phase 2 muon upgrade” • Hold it before June to motivate the upgrades included in TP • Possibly 2-3 days • Seems that April is too soon, look for dates after Fermilab workshop on upgrade physics, e.g. • 12th-14th , starting afternoon of the 12th

  7. Backup

  8. Areas of Phase 2 muon interest 1. Consolidation of existing detectors DT, CSC, RPC • To handle 6x more integrated and 5x more instantaneous luminosity than design • To last ~30 years • To reduce or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions 2. Completion of the forward region 1.6<h<2.4 • Redundancy as originally foreseen 1997 in the muon TDR • Improved high luminosity triggering (lowered thresholds) • New technologies that handle the high rates and complements the CSC, i.e. thin & simple GEM and iRPC 3. Muon tagging for h>2.4 • One GEM station within a rebuilt endcap calorimeter • Up to as high as 4.0 depending on the calorimetry

  9. Consolidation – GIF++ muon planning • NB need additional infrastructure, need for CMS & CERN–wide coordination • Numerous chambers into GIF++ (ME1/1, ME1/2) starting late 2014/early 2015, ~8 months irradiation • Hands-on (–off!) opportunity for young scientists DT CSC RPCs High eta RPC gas studies RPCs consolidation GEM

  10. Consolidation – gas mixtures • GWPs - Global Warming Potentials http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_refrigerants • SF6 is 23900; C2H2F4 is 1100, CF4 is 6500, other fluorocarbons typically ~5000-10000 • Fluorocarbons to be ruled out in the EU after 2017 • RPC gases • Chambers are leaky (500 l/hr), and gas mix C2H2F4 + isoC4H10 + SF6 95/4/0.3% • Fluorocarbons have been essential to good operation of RPCs – so a big problem • CF4 for GEMs and CSCs: • GEMs typically 30% CF4 for optimal timing, but not essential when in conjunction with CSC • CSC contains ~4% of CF4 for anti-aging, little leakage, closed loop gas system and recuperation (but not 100%) • CERN can get EU derogation as a scientific institution, but will substantially reduce global warming components. What about gas availability >2017? • For GEMs we will define the baseline without use of CF4 • Open question: do we need an anti-aging gas R&D for CSC? Not anticipated 5→8 ns

  11. Consolidation – L1 trigger latency • “Old” CSC cathode front-end boards (CFEB) include switched capacitor arrays with 96 cells x 50 ns. These precious cells are used: • Before a “pretrigger” based on pattern of hits in the 6-layer chambers • After each pretrigger but before L1A, store 8 cells (follow fairly slow front-end signal for low noise / high precision) • Curves on right are simulation of the CSC cathode data loss versus L1A latency and rate. Data loss >2% for >10 msec • Cost and effort to replace CFEBs is enormous: 13.8 MChF and *12* months (AL) full-time use of the crane 10 msec 1 MHz • Noted this week that Tracker FE limit is 12.5 msec: will Track Trigger electronics (FPGA or AM solutions) push us as high as that value? Hope not… • What is CSC situation at that latency? Is the data loss random, or not?

  12. New muon detector R&D • GEM detectors (proposed for GE1/1, GE2/1, and ME0 • Chambers: well-advanced in context of GE1/1 • Front-end electronics: VFAT3 needed for CMS and under design • Back-end, DAQ, and trigger electronics R&D: under development for 40o GE1/1 slice test installed in YETS 2016 • Slice test is a natural focus for 2014-2016 R&D • Building 904 combined CSC-GE1/1 test stand is a natural place for tests GE1/1 slice test YETS 2016 VFAT3

  13. New muon detectors: RE3/1 and RE4/1 • Need iRPC (Improved RPC) detectors • Modest 2-4 rate capability improvement factor is sufficient, easily within reach • Using low-noise ATLAS-developed electronics • Using low-resistivity selection of existing bakelite panels • Straightforward build of RE3/1, RE4/1 now seems acceptable • No clear physics motivation yet for ~100 ps resolution Glass RPC multigap • Link to tracks that point at correct vertex • Would need R&D for fast CMS electronics • Need to check links compatible with CSC Track Finder upgrade New RPC electronics

  14. Muon simulation for Phase 2 upgrade • New detectors now implemented • Reconstruction software development beginning • Physics gains being quantified • More attention needed for neutron and other background rates: • Comparisons of data (CSC, RPC, DT) hit rates versus FLUKA and GEANT • L1 trigger situation well understood for GE1/1 addition to CSC • Trigger less well understood for Phase 2 era with the Track Trigger functional • E.g. how good is high-eta efficiency? • Is high-eta TT simulation stable? • Muon system pointing accuracy needed? ME-0 ME-1/1

More Related