1 / 8

Reut Methodology Day

This article explores the reasons why relevancy gaps persist and offers insights on how to address them, using examples from history and present-day challenges such as climate change and societal collapse. It discusses the cognitive, organizational, and political factors that contribute to inaction and provides strategies for preventing and overcoming these gaps.

ortiza
Download Presentation

Reut Methodology Day

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reut Methodology Day

  2. Relevancy Gaps Mindset Divergent Reality Closing Relevancy Gaps Why Relevancy Gaps aren’t closed Identifying Relevancy Gaps How Relevancy Gaps form

  3. How Societies choose to Fail or Succeed Climate Change Environmental Damage How Society Responds to Problems Decreased support from Friends Hostile Neighbors

  4. The Case of the Greenland Norse Arrive 1000 CE; Disappear 1450 Approx 5,000 people in 2 Settlements Communal, violent hierarchical & conservative More European than Europe Climate Change: Little Ice Age Environmental Damage Trade Disengagement from Europe Hostile Neighbors: The Innuit Inability to Adapt

  5. Why Societies Collapse Don’t Anticipate Don’t Perceive No prior experience Some problems imperceptible Reason by false analogy Distant Managers Slow Trend Concealed Don’t Solve (Perceive & Attempt) Don’t Attempt to Solve Solution exists but unviable Rational Bad Behavior Efforts too little too late Dislike those who complain Beyond present capacity to solve Group Denial (Work Avoidance) Status Quo supports deeply held value

  6. Preventing Predictable Surprises Cognitive Organizational Political Generally Optimistic Structural barriers 2 effective info processing Political Losers Mobilize Overly Discount Future Scanning / Integration + Learning Failures Reluctant to change status quo Aviation Security New Security Oversight expensive Airlines Block Reform 9.11 Travel Delays Problem Appears Significant Costs to Solving (Benefits delayed) Tendency to Maintain Status Quo Worsens Definite cost in present; uncertain future cost Vocal Minority vs. Change

  7. Lanir: Between Situational + Fundamental Cognitive Organizational Political Situational:Lack of Information Fundamental:Incompatibility of self perception with reality

  8. Where does it meet Reut? Organizational Mindset Divergent Reality Political Cognitive Don’t Perceive Why Relevancy Gaps aren’t closed Don’t Attempt to Solve Don’t Anticipate Don’t Solve (Perceive & Attempt)

More Related