220 likes | 234 Views
Explore the concept of propaganda from two schools of thought and understand its process of persuasion. Discover how propaganda can be used for both good and ill, and the different intentions behind its implementation.
E N D
International Propaganda What is propaganda?
(At least) 2 schools of thought • Propaganda, however it is defined, is inherently deceitful and thus morally reprehensible • Because it is about manipulation (of symbols, images, words, ideas) it can never be justified • Or - that it is a process of persuasion and, as such, is inherently neutral or value neutral • This lecture takes the latter view….. • ….and thus sees propaganda as a process of persuasion which can be used for good as well as ill.
(At least) 2 models • Authoritarian/Totalitarian – coercion or force in support of persuasion; total censorship; permeates every aspect of society from schools to sport; repetition whether true or not; ‘The Big Lie’; • Democratic – consensus through persuasion, minimal censorship, news rather than views, issue-based, ‘The Strategy of Truth’
What is Propaganda? • Original meaning – to propagate the Catholic ‘faith’ - (Congregatio de Propaganda Fide – 17th Century - renamed the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples in 1967) • Sowing seeds of thought to translate into action (or inaction) • Acquired pejorative meaning 1914-18; cultivation of germ(an)s
‘A Good Word Gone Wrong’ – Popular Associations post 1918 • Atrocity propaganda • Lies and half-truths • A ‘black art’ ‘defiling the human soul’ at a time when the mind was only just becoming understood (psychology) • BUT…..Better to persuade than perish?
The Taylor Definition • Propaganda is a process of persuasion which utilises any available means (media) to persuade people (target audiences) to think and/or behave in a manner desired by the source in order to benefit the interests of that source, either directly or indirectly. • This does not preclude the possibility that the recipient might also benefit in some way.
What it is not • Education …. But? • Is it COMPLETELY honest? • It is not about ‘Truth’ • Confined to dictatorships/authoritarian regimes • Designed to benefit solely the recipient SPECTRUM OF PERSUASION HOW TO THINK WHAT TO THINK EDUCATION PUBLIC RELATIONS WHITE & GREY PROPAGANDA BLACK PROPAGANDA ADVERTISING SPIN
What is propaganda? • It is a process of persuasion • It is on the spectrum of communication from who says what to whom, when, how and with what effect • It injects the question ‘why?’ into that spectrum • Therefore it is about intent • Moral judgements more appropriately directed at intention, not the process or the results
Intentions • As a process, propaganda is value-neutral • As such, it is neither a ‘good’ nor a ‘bad’ thing • Value judgements (‘good’ or ‘bad’) like this are more appropriately directed as the intentions behind doing it • Also more useful to speak of ‘effective’ and ‘ineffective’ propaganda (results) rather than ‘good propaganda’ = successful and ‘bad propaganda’ = unsuccessful
‘Good’ or ‘Bad’ Intentions? WW2 Nazi Propaganda 1990s Balkans Democratic Propaganda 21st century info-propaganda
Propaganda is something someone else does!! • ‘Democracies only resort to propaganda in wartime’ • ‘Totalitarian regimes do it all the time’ • We tell the ‘truth’; they tell lies • In fact we tell our ‘truth’ and they tell their ‘truth’ • Whose ‘truth’ is right? • Better to talk about credibility
Propaganda – NATO definition ANY INFORMATION, IDEAS, DOCTRINES OR SPECIAL APPEALS, DISSEMINATED TO INFLUENCE THE OPINIONS, EMOTIONS, ATTITUDES OR BEHAVIOUR OF ANY SPECIFIED GROUP IN ORDER TO BENEFIT THE SPONSOR, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
PROPAGANDA CATEGORIES • WHITE - overt, attributable to a definite source • BLACK - covert, deliberate deception where a false source is definitely implied • GREY - where a source is concealed and not acknowledged by the originator
COHESIVE PROPAGANDA • CREATES GOODWILL • PROMOTES FRIENDSHIP • RAISES MORALE • STRESSES COMMON • INTERESTS • GAINS CO-OPERATION
DIVISIVE PROPAGANDA • LOWERS MORALE • CREATES APATHY, DEFEATISM & DISCORD • PROMOTES DISSENTION, PANIC SUBVERSION, RESISTANCE, DESERTION, SURRENDER & DEFECTION
PROPAGANDA VARIANTS • INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC INFORMATION (Public Diplomacy/Cultural Diplomacy) • PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE/OPERATIONS • INFORMATION WARFARE/OPERATIONS • PUBLIC RELATIONS/SPIN DOCTORING • ADVERTISING/MARKETING (?) • PUBLICITY • NEWS? (‘the shocktroops of propaganda’)
PROPAGANDA AUTHORITARIAN MODEL (Censorship, police enforcement Media are state controlled, Opposition denied) DEMOCRATIC MODEL (Regulation rather than censorship, media are free/act as watchdog, Opposition essential) Messages compete with others, internally and externally, top down to bottom up to see consensus (ie ‘prevailing truth’) emerge Messages are top down, Centrally coordinated, Outside world sealed off to deny competing ‘truths’
The process of persuasion spectrum in the democratic model POLITICALCOMMS (‘spin’) PROPAGANDA EDUCATION ADVERTISING PUBLIC RELATIONS Who to vote for (benefits the party) Who to like (benefits the company) What to think? (benefits the source) How to think (benefits the recipient) What to buy (benefits the profits)
SUCCESSFUL PROPAGANDA PRINCIPLES IS MOST EFFECTIVE WHEN • IT IS BASED UPON CREDIBLE TRUTH • PRESENTED IN AN ATTRACTIVE FORM • IT AROUSES A NEED • IT SUGGESTS SATISFACTION
ADDITIONAL PRINCIPLES • REFRAINS FROM RIGID DOGMATISM • AVOIDS ANTAGONISM • IDENTIFIES ITSELF WITH THE TARGET • EXPLOITS, WHEN OPPORTUNE, WEAKNESSES IN HOSTILE PROPAGANDA TO THE MAXIMUM
HOW TO GET CAUGHT OUT • Lies will be discovered sooner or later • How to keep secrets (e.g. real source of black propaganda) in the Information Age (Google Earth) • The ‘truth’ must be credible, not incredible • Or do people believe what they want to believe and dismiss alternative views as ‘mere propaganda’?
Key Propaganda Writers Walter Lippmann & Harold Lasswell Aldous Huxley & George Orwell Hitler Jacques Ellul Noam Chomsky & Edward Herman R S Zaharna (on PD) A Pratkanis