1 / 11

Title: Marine Accident Investigation Project Presenter’s Name: Charlie Gibbons Economy: Australia

This presentation discusses the findings of a questionnaire on the capacity and capability of APEC member economies to meet IMO requirements for investigating marine accidents. Conclusions highlight the majority's confidence in their ability to meet requirements and assist other economies if needed.

rhett
Download Presentation

Title: Marine Accident Investigation Project Presenter’s Name: Charlie Gibbons Economy: Australia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group Tokyo, Japan October 10-14 2010 Title: Marine Accident Investigation Project Presenter’s Name: Charlie Gibbons Economy: Australia

  2. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Background • “Code of the International Standards and Recommended Practice for a Safety Investigation into a Marine Casualty or Marine Incident ” • Known as the Casualty Investigation Code • The Casualty Investigation Code is mandatory • Taking effect from 01 January 2010

  3. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 APEC Transport Ministers • APEC Transportation Ministers met in March 2007 in Adelaide Australia • requested the Transport Working Group to establish a register of transport safety training capabilities in member economies to assist with capacity building

  4. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 MEG consideration • At the APEC TPT-WG 29 meeting in July 2007, MEG explored ways of fulfilling the request by Transport Ministers • MEG agreed to determine the capacity of member economies to meet this requirement through the distribution of a questionnaire • Project to be lead by Australia on behalf of MEG

  5. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 The questionnaire • A questionnaire was forwarded to all APEC member economies • The questionnaire provided background on the IMO discussions and introduction of the mandatory requirement to investigate marine accidents • The aim was to ascertain the level of knowledge of the IMO requirements, the technical knowledge and resource availability to meet the requirements and the ability of economies to provide assistance to any economies that may face challenges

  6. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Responses • Responses were received from: • Australia Canada • Peoples Republic of China Hong Kong, China • Japan Republic of Korea • New Zealand Peru • The Philippines Singapore • Chinese Taipei Thailand • Vietnam

  7. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Some Conclusions on Capacity and Capability • Almost all economies are members of the IMO • Almost all economies are signatories to the SOLAS Convention • All economies have their own flag register • All economies have an agency that investigate marine casualties and incidents • Investigation reports are available to the public in a majority of economies

  8. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Conclusions - continued • A majority of economies provide reports of investigations to the IMO • 8 economies always attend IMO meetings, 4 sometimes and 1 never • About the same proportions attend MSC meetings • Just over half the economies are members of the MAIIF and attend meetings • 3 economies described their knowledge of the IMO proposal as limited – all others believed their knowledge to be comprehensive

  9. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Conclusions - continued • 5 economies consider their capability (level of technical knowledge) to be moderate to meet the IMO requirements – all others consider their capability to be high • 2 economies considers their capacity (level of resources) to be limited – all others consider their capacity to be adequate to meet the IMO requirements

  10. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Conclusions - continued • 3 economies have concerns they will not be able to meet the IMO requirements – all others consider they can meet the requirements • 8 economies consider they have the capacity, capability and ability to assist other economies if needed

  11. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Capacity and capability assistance • The following economies have indicated their ability and willingness to assist building capacity and capability:

More Related