1 / 31

THEMIS Mission CDR Project Management Peter R. Harvey University of California - Berkeley

THEMIS Mission CDR Project Management Peter R. Harvey University of California - Berkeley. Agenda. Project Status Mission Architecture Programmatics Organization Processes Reviews and RFAs Schedule Resources Cost Risks Issues Summary. Mission. Mission Launch

sonia-mosley
Download Presentation

THEMIS Mission CDR Project Management Peter R. Harvey University of California - Berkeley

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THEMIS Mission CDR • Project Management • Peter R. Harvey • University of California - Berkeley

  2. Agenda • Project Status • Mission Architecture • Programmatics • Organization • Processes • Reviews and RFAs • Schedule • Resources • Cost • Risks • Issues • Summary

  3. Mission • Mission • Launch Vehicle: Delta II, Eastern Range Injection: 305 km x 12 Re, 9.5 degrees inclination Date: October19, 2006 • Space Segment Spacecraft: 5 Spinning probes with fuel for orbit/attitude adjust Instruments: 3-Axis Electric Field, Magnetic Field 3-D Ion & Electron Particle Detectors Orbit Period(s): 1, 2 and 4 days Orientation: Ecliptic normal (South Pointing Antenna) • Ground Segment Observatories: 20 Northern of All Sky Imaging and Magnetometers • Operations Phases: I&T, L&EO (3 mo), Campaigns (Dec-Mar), Deorbit Lifetime: 2 years

  4. Programmatics • Programmatics • “PI/GSFC Team” Mode PI Team Provides Space, Ground, Data Segments PI Team Provides Cost, Schedule, Performance Assurance PI Team Provides Education/Public Outreach GSFC to Provide Oversight in QA, Safety, LV, Range interface • Cost and Schedule Caps Single Cost Cap for the Mission Launch no later than March 2007 • Performance Assurance MIDEX Quality Requirements • Implementation Strategy Use Heritage Instrumentation Coordinate Common Buy Parts Keep Probe/Probe Carrier Simple and Robust

  5. Mission Manager Frank Snow, GSFC Project Scientist D. Sibeck, GSFC Launch Vehicle G. Skrobott, KSC THEMIS PI V. Angelopolous, UCB Science Co-I’s EPO N. Craig, UCB Project Manager P. Harvey, UCB Quality Assurance R. Jackson, UCB Scheduling D. Meilhan, UCB Financial Mgr K. Harps, UCB Subcontracts J. Keenan, UCB Mechanical/ Thermal Systems P. Turin, UCB C. Smith, UCB Mission Systems E. Taylor, UCB Probe/Probe Carrier Management UCB Oversight: D. King Swales Mgr: M. Cully Instruments P. Berg, UCB Software Systems D. King, UCB Mag Cleanliness C. Russell, UCLA Mission I&T R. Sterling, UCB Ground Segment M. Bester, UCB Organization

  6. Instruments P. Berg Instrument Data Processor Unit (IDPU) M. Ludlam Electric Field Instrument (EFI) J. Bonnell ElectroStatic Analyser (ESA) C. Carlson Solid State Telescope (SST) D. Larson Fluxgate Mag (FGM) U. Auster Search Coil Mag (SCM) A. Roux Robert Abiad Peter Berg Heath Bersch Dorothy Gordon Frank Harvey Selda Heavner Jim Lewis Jeanine Potts Chris Scholz Nestor Castillo Forrest Mozer Greg Delory Art Hull Bill Donakowski Greg Dalton Robert Duck Mark Pankow Dan Schickele Stu Harris Hilary Richard M. Marckwardt Bill Elliott Ron Herman Chris Scholz Heath Bersch Robert Lin Davin Larson Ron Canario Robert Lee T. Moreau TUBS/IWF Uli Auster K.H. Glassmeier W. Magnes CETP Alain Roux Bertran de la Porte Olivier Le Contel Christophe Coillot Abdel Bouabdellah Mag Booms LASP Robert Ergun Aref Nammari Ken Stevens Jim Westfall Hari Dharan Y. Kim Tien Tan Bill Tyler Organization

  7. Organization Ground Segment Mission Ops Science Ops (Mission Planning) Ground Based Observatories Manfred Bester Mark Lewis Tim Quinn Sabine Frey Tai Phan John Bonnell Laura Peticolas All Sky Imagers Ground Magnetometers Fielding & Operation (UC&UA) Stephen Mende Stu Harris Steve Geller Harald Frey UCLA Chris Russell Joe Means Dave Pierce Bob Snare UC Eric Donovan GSFC/GCND David Sibeck Mark Beckman Bob DeFazio David Folta Rick Harman UA J. Samson

  8. Organization Organizational Roles and Responsibilities

  9. Processes • Management Responsibilities • Staffing and Facilities, Training and Certification – Ongoing (more to go) • Subcontract Generation and Tracking – Only SAI to be completed • Schedule Generation and Tracking – Bi-weekly & bi-monthly reviews • Budget Generation and Tracking – Monthly • Cost .v. Schedule Compliance – Monthly (see below) • Risk Identification, Risk Tracking, Risk Actions - Weekly • Descope Identification, Cost Evaluation, Descope Actions - Complete • Trade Studies Identification, Evaluation, Changes – 13 System changes • Action Item Generation, Distribution and Tracking - Ongoing • Technical & Financial Report Generation – Monthly

  10. Processes • Systems Engineering Responsibilities • Requirements Identification and Formalization - Complete • Design Coordination, Studies (FTA, FMEA, etc) - Complete • Technical Review Coordination, Informal and Formal - Ongoing • ICD Generation - Complete • Configuration Control - Ongoing • Verification Matrix Development - Complete • Design Compliance - Coming Up • Operations Plan Development - Complete • Action Item Management - Ongoing • Weekly telecons on S/C bus, Instrumentation, Ground Systems - Ongoing • Periodic On-site meetings - Ongoing

  11. Processes Request for Action Status – not including SC peer reviews

  12. Processes • Performance Assurance Responsibilities • Assurance Requirements Identification - Complete • Performance Assurance Implementation Plan - Complete • Subcontractor Assurance Plan Reviews - Complete • System Safety – Complete (to date) • Supplier On-Site Inspections of Facilities and Procedures - Complete • Parts and Materials Research, Selection - Complete • Parts Qualification, Procurement incl. Common Buy Program - Complete • Verification Planning (Oversight) - Upcoming • Inspections and Test Verifications - Upcoming • Failure Report Management - Upcoming • Weekly telecons on S/C bus, Instrumentation, Ground Systems - Ongoing • Periodic On-site meetings - Ongoing

  13. Processes • Independent Verification and Validation IV&V Initial Assessment of Essential Software • Bus Avionics Unit: Telecom, Bus Control, Minimal Autonomy - Completed • IDPU : Instrument Control, Data Storage, Calculations - Completed • Operations: ReUse of GSFC-supplied software – Completed IV&V Recommended Approach / MOA – Completed IV&V Participation in FSW Monthly Status - Ongoing

  14. Processes • Team Communications • Day-to-Day • Email List Server • FTP sites for documents • Expanded Conferencing • Weekly Meetings/Telecons • Status of Space & Ground • Eng Change Notices • Cost and Schedule • Risks • Monthly Meetings and Reports • Comprehensive Report Integrating All Internal Status • All Development Team Leads Provide Narratives • Swales Narrative, Long-Lead and Milestone Schedules, Costs • Integrated Reports Available on the THEMIS website

  15. Schedule • Key Features Instrument Development • EM Instrument I/F Testing with EM Probe I/F – August 2004 • Integrate Instrument Complement at UCB Prior to S/C Integration • Instrument Complement F1 Tested First Followed by Pairs • Added F1 Pre-Ship Review before F2-F5 Qualification • All Instrument Complements are Complete before S/C I&T Begins – Not! • Instrument I&T Team Will Be Focusing Upon S/C I&T – Need 2 teams • Added Facilities for Qualifying Instruments in Parallel Spacecraft Development • Integration and Test of Probe1 Completed Prior to Probes 2-5 – OK • Added P1 Pre-Ship Review before P2-P5 Integration • Sufficient Manpower and Equipment for Parallel I&T Ground Development • Development and Deployment of 5 GBOs 2 in 1Q05, all 20 in 1Q06 Launch No Earlier Than October 19, 2004 – GSFC Requirement

  16. THEMIS INSTRUMENT TOP LEVEL SCHEDULE PROJECT MGR. : PETER HARVEY STATUS AS OF 6/04/04 MISSION MGR. : FRANK SNOW MISSION MGR. : FRANK SNOW CY 2005 CY 2004 MILESTONES M D J M M M J S O N F A A J A CR 4/22 MAJOR REVIEWS 11/12 MISSION PDR FGM/SCM CDR 4/06-08 CRR 2/04 1 IDPU DEVELOPMENT INSTRU. CDR 4/19-20 MISSION CDR 6/14-18 BOARD I&T COMPL. IDPU ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T IDPU ETU I &T COMPL LEGEND 7/20 8/12 4 2 6 3 5 1 IDPU FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T FLT 1 BD FAB/ASSY COMPL -- ETU Activity FLT I&T COMPL -- Flight Activity 11/16 11/01 11/30 10/04 11/09 11/23 12/07 2 EFI SPB / AXB DEVELOPMENT ETU COMPL FLT FAB 3 1 2 4 5-6 FLT I&T COMPL EFI SPB DESIGN, FAB, I&T (ETU & FLT) ETU COMPL 8/26 6/22 FLT MACH 9/30 10/21 12/09 11/18 12/30 4 2 5-6 1 3 EFI AXB DESIGN, FAB, I&T (ETU & FLT) FLT I&T COMPL 7/02 5/03 10/19 12/21 9/28 11/09 11/30 3 ESA DEVELOPMENT BOARD I&T COMPL. DSG COMPL. ESA ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T ESA ETU I &T COMPL 8/12 8/26 3/25 FLT 1-6 BD FAB/ASSY COMPL 1-6 EFI FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T FLT I&T COMPL 10/20 11/26 4 SST DEVELOPMENT BOARD I&T COMPL. DSG COMPL. SST ETU I &T COMPL SST ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T 6/25 6/11 3/05 5 1 4 FLT 1-6 BD FAB/ASSY COMPL 2 3 6 SST FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T FLT I&T COMPL 9/10 10/12 11/02 11/23 10/22 10/01 11/12 5 FGM DEVELOPMENT FGE ETU DEL. To GERMANY FGE ETU/F6 I &T COMPL FGM ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T 6/04 3/19 FGE/PCB FLT 1-5 DEL to GERMANY 1-2 3-5 FGM FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T FLT I&T COMPL 9/13 11/08 1/31 6 SCM DEVELOPMENT SCM EM DESIGN, FAB, I&T SC/EM I &T COMPL 6/11 4-6 CUBE DEL. 1-3 SCM FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T FLT I&T COMPL 7/23 ETU I &T COMPL 11/10 9/28 7 FAB FLT HINGES 1-2 3-4 5-6 FGM/SCM BOOM FLIGHT FAB & I&T FLT I&T COMPL 3/05 7/08 7/16 9/30 10/14 10/28 1 ETU INSTRU. I &T COMPL START FLT INSTRU I&T 8 1/17 INSTRUMENT I&T 3 2 8/12 10/08 11/01 3/03 4 5 6 INSTRUMENT INTEGRATION & TEST 2/21 5/18 4/07 4/14 **BASED ON SCHEDULE FROM 2/20/04 Schedule

  17. THEMIS S/C & I&T MISSION SCHEDULE PROJECT MGR. : PETER HARVEY STATUS AS OF: 06/13/04 MISSION MGR. : FRANK SNOW CY 2004 CY 2005 CY 2006 MILESTONES J D S O J M A M J A S N D J M A M J A S O N J M A M J J A F J O F F CRR 2/04 4/22 CR @ HQ PSR 5/26 6/07 P1 PER MAJOR REVIEWS P2/P3 DELTA PER 11/09 4/06-08 FGM/SCM CDR 5/25-26 INSTRUMENT CDR 4/19-20 P4/P5 DELTA PER 12/14 6/15-16 MISSION CDR P1 INTEGRATION & TEST BOTTOM PANEL RCS 1 LEGEND PROBE SUBSYSTEM HARDWARE 2/03 BUS/INSTRU. AVIONICS -- Bus Slack 2/04 5/09 BUS INTEGR. & BUS/INSTRU. INTEGR. 3/18 INSTRU COMPL 20 DAYS -- Critical Path BUS/INSTRUMENT ENVIRONMENTALS 6/08 8/22 Contingency 12/27 -- Project Reserve 9/06 POST ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES 15 DAYS -- Instrument Slack P2 INTEGRATION & TEST 2 PROBE SUBSYSTEM HARDWARE AVIONICS BUS/INSTRU. 6/23 10/31 BUS INTEGR. & BUS/INSTRU. INTEGR. 8/04 9/28 6 DAYS INSTRU COMPL BUS/INSTRUMENT ENVIRONMENTALS 11/10 12/24 1/31 1/06 POST ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES 5 DAYS P3 INTEGRATION & TEST 3 PROBE SUBSYSTEM HARDWARE AVIONICS BUS/INSTRU. 6/23 10/31 BUS INTEGR. & BUS/INSTRU. INTEGR. 8/04 9/28 6 DAYS INSTRU COMPL BUS/INSTRUMENT ENVIRONMENTALS 11/10 12/24 2/7 1/06 POST ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES 5 DAYS P4 INTEGRATION & TEST 4 PROBE SUBSYSTEM HARDWARE AVIONICS BUS/INSTRU. 8/05 12/05 BUS INTEGR. & BUS/INSTRU. INTEGR. 11/01 9/15 6 DAYS INSTRU COMPL BUS/INSTRUMENT ENVIRONMENTALS 12/15 2/11 3/7 2/22 POST ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES 5 DAYS P5 INTEGRATION & TEST 5 PROBE SUBSYSTEM HARDWARE AVIONICS BUS/INSTRU. 8/05 12/05 BUS INTEGR. & BUS/INSTRU. INTEGR. 11/01 9/15 6 DAYS INSTRU COMPL BUS/INSTRUMENT ENVIRONMENTALS 12/15 2/11 3/14 2/22 POST ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES 5 DAYS 3/07 6 PROBE CAR. / INSTRU. INTEGR. 5/16 7 PROBE CARRIER ASSY TEST 7 DAYS 8 MISSION RESERVE 7/31 45 DAYS 9 10 DAYS MISSION RESERVE 8/01 10 LAUNCH PROCESSING/LAUNCH 10/19 Schedule

  18. Deliverables Contract Deliverables – PDR-CDR

  19. Deliverables Contract Deliverables – PDR-CDR

  20. Deliverables Contract Deliverables – PDR-CDR

  21. Resources • SSL Projects at PDR STEREO Personnel Not Available; MMS Now Starting Up SNAP and MMS Projects Will Help Offload Personnel

  22. Resources • SSL Projects at CDR “Moon/Mars” Delay for MMS & SNAP removes incentive to complete Will Lose Talent Capable of Building MMS unless something done Moon-Mars Gap

  23. Resources • Facilities • Chamber Availability at UCB/SSL • Numerous Tanks of Varying Sizes & Types – All Still in Use by STEREO! • One New Chamber Needed for THEMIS – 3 Being Built/Tested! • One Calibration Chamber Needs Parts – Could not be Fixed, Replaced. • TV Plan Assumptions • 2 Component-Level TV Cycles • 6 Instrument Level TV Cycles • Schedule has assumed new chambers are ready. • Established weekly tag-up meetings on these TV chambers • Put people experienced in these systems on the project • Have contacted NTS (LA) for availability of chambers as a backup.

  24. Cost • Changes from PDR Additional Management • Added Swales/FSW Oversight Growth in Probe/Probe Carrier • Added RCS Pressurant System to deal with Mass Growth • ESC Compliant Solar Arrays Growth in I&T Costs • GSFC Review of P1 Qualification before P2-P5 Integration • GSFC Review of F1 Qualification before F2-F5 Qualification Growth in LV Cost • All “TLX” separation system recommended by GSFC • Disallowed as a Mission Unique by KSC

  25. Cost • Cost Performance v Budget thru MCDR • Cumulative Costs + Liens v Budget at +3% • Cumulative Costs v Budget alone at –19% • Schedule is appx –12% (bracketed by the float)

  26. Cost • Descopes Remaining L1 Requirements Allow Flexibility in Instrumentation Power, Mass, Cost Impacts

  27. Risk • Reduction Activities since PDR • Added Thermal Expertise (Paul Cleveland) • Added Structural Expertise (Terry Scharton) • Added Spacecraft Oversight (David King) • Added Bi-Monthly Schedule Reviews with Code 500 • Added Monthly Probe Software Status Meetings • Increased Fuel Capacity to re-establish adequate margins • Added Instrument and Probe #1 Reviews before #2-#5 • Changed to the “all TLX” separation system • Prioritized Safety Studies and Planning • Added ESA HV Enable Plug

  28. Risk Risk List (UCB view, Top-Down)

  29. Risk Risk List (UCB, Top Down) P/I Definitions Matrix

  30. Issues • Significant New Issues since PDR • Delay in Confirmation Review for 2 months • No LV-to-Spacecraft Interface Definition for CDR • Delay in Launch Date for 2 months • Decreased Time to Deploy 5 Probes Before 1st Winter • Will Switch Science Plans at some point if launch date slips more • Need to have a clear launch-date decision point • KSC Determination that TLX be Handled by UCB/Swales • Messy Organizational Interface with Boeing • If there is a mishap, this will be the “root cause.” • Recommend a clear MOU on roles & responsibilities • Delay in MMS and SNAP Projects • Difficulty in Offloading Personnel • Potential Cost and Schedule Impacts • PM to develop offloading strategy

  31. Summary • Summary Stable Science and Mission Concept No Show Stoppers Identified Development or Review Teams Organization is Active in All Development Areas Weekly and bi-weekly Telecons Active in all Major Areas Systems Engineering Reliability Analyses, ICD’s and Verification Plans Complete Review Process in Place Successful Reviews at Subsystem Level RFAs Being Worked Detailed Design Efforts at Full Speed Drawings Complete Board-level Engineering Modeling in Progress Mechanism ETU Testing and Qualifications in Progress

More Related