1 / 16

EASA Verification

EASA Verification. Milen Dentchev ANS Standardisation Section Manager. Received data . Answers Justifications / comments Evidence / references ANSP evidence should be available at NSA level and will only be requested if needed . EoSM and JC verification data flow.

tirzah
Download Presentation

EASA Verification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EASA Verification Milen Dentchev ANS Standardisation Section Manager

  2. Received data • Answers • Justifications / comments • Evidence / references • ANSP evidence should be available at NSA level and will only be requested if needed

  3. EoSM and JC verification data flow EASA/PRB Workshop

  4. EASA verification methodology Three methods of Safety KPI verification: • Light verification through desktop audits based on available documentation (e.g. written evidences provided to EASA, information published on the Internet or available in ECTL) + clarification on the phone (interviews) • Thorough verification during Standardisation inspections using Checklists and based on Findings and UNCs • Trustful verification through desktop audits based on reports on closure of Corrective actions (further verified during follow-up inspections) EASA/PRB Workshop

  5. Light verification • NSA verification first, followed by ANSP verification

  6. Light verification of NSA quest. • Sampling 3 to 5 answers from each questionnaire • If OK, then move to the next one • If not, then thorough check • Thorough verification for some NSAs randomly • Use external information as far as practical • Phone call / email if necessary

  7. Light verification of ANSP quest. • Verify the main ANSP for each State • Sampling 3 to 5 answers from each questionnaire • If OK, then move to the next one • If not, then thorough check • Verify at least one additional ANSP with the same method as above. • Thorough verification for some ANSPs randomly • Use external information as far as practical • Phone call / email to NSA if necessary

  8. EASA thorough verification • Verification during Standardisation inspections using Checklists • Structure of ANS checklist CA/NSA: • LEG/REG • ORG • Initial Oversight • Ongoing Oversight • PEL • RSC • MOR • Structure of ANS checklist Undertakings: • ANSP (ATS/CNS/AIS/MET/TOs) EASA/PRB Workshop

  9. EASA thorough verification Several steps are foreseen: • Step 1 – mapping ANS checklists with EoSM questions • Step 2 – adding reference to ANS Checklists • Step 3 – on site auditing • Step 4 – If finding is raised, checking answers in EoSM EASA/PRB Workshop

  10. EASA thorough verification • 1st step – mapping ANS checklist with EoSM questions • Examples of matching PQs with EoSM Q: • MO1.1: Implement the EU safety legislative and regulatory framework, including where necessary, by aligning the national framework. • Q1-3 There are national secondary regulations that address requirements stemming from primary legislation, international obligations and they are in line with the EU Regulatory Framework in relation to ATM/ANS. • Question # 20 of LEG Checklist • Has the State developed and promulgated ANS regulations to enable the implementation of the provisions related to ICAO Annexes? EASA/PRB Workshop

  11. EASA thorough verification • Examples of matching PQs with EoSM Q : • MO2.1: Establish controls which govern how service providers’ safety management systems (SMS) will identify hazards and manage safety risks • Q2.1 The competent authority has established oversight procedures which aim to monitor compliance with the SMS requirements by the service providers in particular the requirements for hazards identification and risk assessment and mitigation. • Question # 100 of On-going Oversight Checklist • Does the process address the implementation of safety objectives, safety requirements and other safety-related conditions identified in risk assessment and mitigation procedures required by safety regulatory requirements applicable to air navigation services, ATFM and ASM? EASA/PRB Workshop

  12. EASA thorough verification • 2nd step – adding reference to ANS Checklists Adding reference to checklist EASA/PRB Workshop

  13. EASA thorough verification • Next step – on site audit • If answer is not satisfactory, then auditor will check the answer in EoSM Questionnaire In this case correction would be required EASA/PRB Workshop

  14. EASA trustful verification • The same as light verification, but taking into account • Corrective Actions • Status of their closure

  15. Verification process: output • The overall computed scores as provided by the NSA will not change, but the process will verify them.

  16. Verification results • Light / trustful verification • EASA may ask States for additional evidence to support the score provided • EASA will inform PRB of the verification results when completed • Thorough verification • Based on evidence EASA asks the State to change the computed scores and reflects it in the EASA standardisation inspection report. • EASA will inform PRB of the request to the State, after the FCC meeting.

More Related