1 / 12

Actions summary Kick-off meeting Genova, 6-8 November 2008

Actions summary Kick-off meeting Genova, 6-8 November 2008. IRIDE Congress Centre Via SS Giacomo e Filippo, 7 Genova-Italy. Nature-SDI plus and the INSPIRE metho-dology:. actions: 1: what available 2: match analysis 3.1: reporting difference 3.2: what to do.

ugo
Download Presentation

Actions summary Kick-off meeting Genova, 6-8 November 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Actions summaryKick-off meetingGenova, 6-8 November 2008 IRIDE Congress Centre Via SS Giacomo e Filippo, 7 Genova-Italy

  2. Nature-SDIplus and the INSPIRE metho-dology: actions: 1: what available 2: match analysis 3.1: reporting difference 3.2: what to do the Annex I (Protected Sites) theme is already at this step, with the testing phase starting now

  3. Annex 1 Protected sites – INSPIRE TESTING • Step 1 • Distribution of the template for identification of available data sets GISIG 11 Nov, after receiving and processing comments from UNABDN • all Partners (Data Providers and/or National ”Intermediates”) to return the template: • November 24° Data sets of Protected sites (only) • Analysis and systematisation of the available datasets (UNIABDN) • December 5 Data sets of Protected sites

  4. 1: what available Examples: Preparation of the table of the available datasets

  5. Annex 1 Protected sites – INSPIRE TESTING • Step 2 • Definition of draft template and guidelines with the INSPIRE structure WG Testing 5 December • all Partners (Data Providers and/or National ”Intermediates”) to return the template: • January 15 2009 (after one month from the final version of the template)

  6. … 2: match analyis A match to individuate concordance, differences, gaps and the definition of critical points The data structure proposed by INSPIRE The actual data structures met in the project datasets A description spreadsheet okmmmhko(1)not considered,out of scope (1) Not only difference, but also presence or absence between the two

  7. Annex 1 Protected sites – INSPIRE TESTING • Step 3 • Definition of template and guidelines for 3.1 and 3.2 WG Testing 31 December • all Partners (Data Providers and/or National ”Intermediates”) to return the templates filled: • Until 10 February 2009

  8. report and evidence of differences to INSPIRE; comments. 3.1: gap description TELLING THE USE CASES THAT HAVE MOTIVATED CONTENT AND STRUCTURE OF THE PROVIDED DATASET AND VERIFICATION OF HOW THESE NEEDS ARE MATCHED, IF ARE, BY THE INSPIRE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. REPORTING GAPS AND LACKS WITH REGARD TO THE INSPIRE VISION Description of the need(s) originating the datasets A: in another data theme Annex I ; reporting how is needed for protected sites B: is expected in another data theme Annex II or III C: it should be here

  9. No match no. 1 Transformation Harmonised solution No match no. 2 Transformation Harmonised solution No match no. 3 Transformation Harmonised solution No match no. 4 Transformation Harmonised solution No match no. 5 Transformation Harmonised solution No match no. 6 Transformation Harmonised solution No match no. 7 Transformation Harmonised solution … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … TESTING TRANSFORMATION: A PROPOSAL 3.2: what to do DISCUSSIONSTARTING NOW AND, LATER, PROPOSALS BY THE PARTNERS ON THE BASIS OF THE DATASET ANALYSIS AND OF THE MEANINGFUL DIFFERENCES TO BE INVESTIGATED

  10. TESTING GENERAL • A Technical Working Group for the INSPIRE Testing activity (TWG-INSPIRE) is constituted to: • define templates, including the data structure proposed by INSPIRE • define “guidelines” for the steps 1-2-3.1- 3.2 for the partners • The TWG-INSPIRE is constituted by GISIG, the WPs 2-3-4-5 Leaders, the task leaders of 2.3, all WP3 tasks and 5.1, as well as by Wassilios Kazakos (Disy) and Anders Ostman-HiG (for his parallel activity for INSPIRE testing in Sweden) • Interwise telco TWG-INSPIRE: December 1st • NATURA 2000 testing (by KU.LEUVEN) will be considered as example for the templates, to help the other testing groups.

  11. WPs ACTION PLAN • Action plan for the first semester (until March 31st) • All the Task Leaders with task staring within Mar 09 • To provide to the WPL and GISIG with a draft action plan for the task • With expected contributions by the partners and inputs from other tasks • Deadline 28 November • WPs telco • First week of December

  12. A very draft proposal about it: • Participation into the Annex III INSPIRE TWGs • Data themes: Biogeographical regions Habitats and biotopes Species distribution • For each of the TWGs at least 2 persons from the Nature-SDIplus partnership • Feed-back to partners and consequent decision to operate

More Related