610 likes | 633 Views
Imperial Powers and Decolonization: Revolution in the Portuguese Colonies. March 13. Revolution: Portuguese Colonies. Be Sure to Re-Read Lecture on Imperial Powers and Decolonization: Settler Colonies (March 6) -relevant section for this lecture, slides 9-23. Revolution: Portuguese Colonies.
E N D
ImperialPowers andDecolonization:Revolution in thePortuguese Colonies March 13
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies Be Sure to Re-ReadLecture on Imperial Powers and Decolonization: Settler Colonies(March 6) -relevant section for this lecture, slides 9-23
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies What was ‘different’ about armed battle for Independence in Portuguese Colonies? - Reid (Textbook) looks at Decolonization and Independence in terms of ‘negotiated’ versus ‘violent’ methods - problematic: e.g. he counts Kenya among ‘negotiated’ – difficulty for this interpretation being Mau Mau!
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies Our Approach: distinguish between ‘non-settler’ and ‘settler’ regimes -consistent with Davidson: “Where settlers were many … the road to independence was soaked in blood.”
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies “... The Road to Independence was soaked with Blood”: violence, armed struggle, war - because of Colonial Resistance ‘that road’ was often taken in the 1960s (even into the 1970s)
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies Implications Twofold: - coincided with peak of Cold War [next week] which meant that many struggles were defined in terms of that war [evident and important in the Portuguese case but will be developed more in the context of the next few weeks] - necessitated strategies (military, economic) and ideologies to define ‘struggle’ such that its goals – ‘post-colonial society’ – were enough to convince people to give their lives
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies What made Portuguese Colonies Different? - recognition that African support (and needed foreign economic/military support) could only be acquired by developing a strong Ideology and Strategy for Struggle
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies What made Portuguese Colonies Different? - the unique local social/cultural make up: complicated challenges already significant because of (African) ethnic differences - mulattoes and even some assimiladoes did not necessarily ‘side’ with the Portuguese: these were ‘locals’ to be fought over/won over to the cause of Independence
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies What made Portuguese Colonies Different? - (therefore): RACE was not at all straightforward - it was not ‘black and white’ as it was in some colonies (e.g. Rhodesia) - required more ‘sophisticated’ concepts: Independence politics, Post-Independence Society -- became divisive issue within movements (e.g. Mozambique’s FRELIMO)
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies What made Portuguese Colonies Different? -their history would be one of not only ‘independence’ but ‘new societies’ in Africa -produced major intellectual, political ‘thinkers’:AmilcarCabral (Portuguese Guinea) Samora Machel (Mozambique) [see Davidson Video segment, Add’l Rdgs]
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies Amilcar Cabral (Portuguese Guinea): • openly questioned ‘real’ aims of imperialist countries (European and American) - in agreeing to African independence in context of emerging Cold War, were they not trying to prevent …
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies “…the enlargement of the socialist camp, [to] liberate the reactionary forces in our countries stifled by colonialism, and enable these forces to ally themselves with the international bourgeoisie [middle class].” [from B Davidson, Modern Africa, p.104] [taken from Lecture February 27, context of ‘Decolonization. Also relevant in Lectures on ‘Cold War’]
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies Decolonization did not only involve ‘negotiated’ (peaceful) processes and ‘non-negotiated’ (violent) processes [Reid] – it involved instances of real REVOLUTION: ‘process’ underpinned by ideological goals differing significantly and (in context of Cold War), confrontationally from values, economics, politics of former colonial power And as Davidson points out: not only was Portugal Western and Capitalist – but Fascist
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies Between 1961-63: political struggle became armed warfare in Mozambique, Guinea Bissau and Angola
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies Portuguese Guinea
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies Mozambique
Revolution: Portuguese Colonies Video:Basil Davidson “Africa: Rise of Nationalism”[34:18 - 45:10]
Revolution: Mozambique Liberation forces FRELIMO: - central issue: how to unify? - Mozambique large, many ethnic groups, languages (in addition to ‘settler’ issues) - central divide: Zambesi River (created a distinct North and South) Leader Eduardo Mondlane: used Socialist ideology, Portuguese language (ironically) to address divisions
Rhodesia SouthAfrica
Revolution: Mozambique Portuguese reactions: - colonial power infiltrated liberation groups with informers - 1969: Mondlano assassinated [referenced in Davidson Video] - revealed and exacerbated internal FRELIMO ‘divisions’
Revolution: Mozambique Not All Mozambicans Favoured Independence Won by War: Mondlano’s Death Split FRELIMO - right wing: work with Portuguese, seek more opportunities • - left wing: full-scale social revolution, anti- colonial war Left wing emerged predominant: Samora Machel new FRELIMO leader
Battle against Colonialism, not ‘whites’ per se. Battle for Independence and ‘new society’.
Revolution: Mozambique FRELIMO strength principally in south, heavily rural areas - (mostly) opposed in north - taking large northern province of Tete, major victory [see Video and Machel’s explanation as to why Tete was so important]
Mozambique Rhodesia SouthAfrica
Revolution: Mozambique - allowed FRELIMO to cross Zambesi - position also allowed for attacks on critical Beira railroad: - railroad led to Rhodesia - transported materials for Cabora Bassa Dam
Revolution: Mozambique Cabora Bassa Dam: - project funded by South Africa, various European countries - aim: to provide electricity to South African gold mines [more on South Africa later in the course] - huge international significance
Revolution: Mozambique Cabora Bassa Dam: - project employed many 1000s Africans - target (symbolic and real) of FRELIMO’s struggle - FRELIMO strategies effective
Cabora BassaDam: workersin the canteen.Differences between African service(top) , ‘Whites’(below)evidence of new racism.Whites paid up to 6X more than Blacks.
FRELIMO successful bombing,derailing trains on Beirarailroad.Disrupteddelivery supplies toCabora Bassa Dam; Rhodesia.
FRELIMO in pictures: challenges, goals reflected in photos - taken by Canadian journalist ‘on the ground’ - publicized in Canada and West more generally Important not just as historical evidence but as insight into what was influencing international campaign at the time
Supplies had to be carriedoverland; ittook weeksto transportneeded goodsto the Frontlines.
‘Liberated Areas’: collective agricultural projectsundertaken for subsistence and export.
In all ‘Liberated Territories’ schools educatedthose‘cheated bycolonialism’.
Revolution: Mozambique Impact on Metropole: - Portugal drained by costs of war - early 1970s, almost half national budget spent on colonial wars in Africa - no development taking place in Portugal itself - young men migrating to France (and elsewhere) in search of work
Revolution: Mozambique Portuguese Military: - national military often seen as ‘way out’ for poor with no education, few skills, no future - Portuguese army no exception - but… war affecting recruitment of young men who had any other choice’ (including out- migration to France): problem • - draft (military conscription) enacted
Revolution: Mozambique Many appalled by reality of wars in Africa:- 1970s, pictures (like following) distributed internationally [part of same series by Canadian journalist cited above] - tactics of guerilla war when seen ‘up close in photos’ put new image on argument of ‘protecting overseas provinces’No longer military recruitment but army ‘on-the-ground’ desertions became major problem.
Revolution: Mozambique Portugal faced other problems: - rural population supported FRELIMO, helped compensate for logistical difficulties of transporting supplies -“Liberated Zones” with schools, agricultural projects, hospitals desirable – therefore, protected - attracted even those who initially opposed FRELIMO