190 likes | 368 Views
LUSI Coherent X-Ray Imaging Instrument Final Instrument Design Review INTRODUCTION. Thomas Fornek Project Manager June 3, 2009. LUSI WBS Organization. Project description (1). LUSI is Providing Instruments for Three of the Six LCLS Instrument Hutches. Near Experimental Hall.
E N D
LUSICoherent X-Ray Imaging Instrument Final Instrument Design ReviewINTRODUCTION Thomas Fornek Project Manager June 3, 2009
Project description (1) LUSI is Providing Instruments for Three of the Six LCLS Instrument Hutches Near Experimental Hall X-ray Transport Far Experimental Hall 1 3 2 5 4 6 XCSMono SXR AMO XPP XCS CXI H6 Installation Part of LCLS Part of LCLS FES ARRA Funds Beam Transport LCLS Offset Monochromator Exp. Chamber Detector LUSI H6
Project description (2) CXI WBS 1.3 X-ray transport tunnel (200 m) XCS WBS 1.4 XPP WBS 1.2 LCLS SXR XCS Offset Monochromator WBS 1.5 H6 LCLS AMO
Project Status (1) LUSI Baseline Performance (through Apr09) TPC = $60M (MIE = $55.1M, OPC = $4.9M) CD-4 = August 2012 TPC >26% Complete, TEC >18% Complete Contingency on MIE = $11.8M 33.2% on remaining work OPC is complete $50K remaining for close-out ARRA Funds ($33.6M) Received in April Part of the $60M TPC Most recent added scope to enhance LUSI science program Large Offset Monochromator for XPP Focusing lens for CXI
Project Status (2) • Design Completion • XPP Instrument Design through FIDR • CD-3 Ready • CXI Instrument FIDR in June • 90% CD-3 Ready Now - Solid Instrument Configuration • XCS Instrument FIDR in June • 90% CD-3 Ready Now - Instrument configuration is solid • Diagnostics and Common Optics Design • 90% CD-3 Ready Now • Harmonic Rejection Mirror PDR in June • Controls and Data Acquisition • 100% CD-3 Ready Now • Inherited Designs from LCLS comprise many items
Project Status (3) • Still waiting for the DOE-IPR Status Review Report • Responses have been prepared to the close-out report recommendations • Preparing for the July 15, 2009 CD-3 Review • Held in Germantown • LUSI PM, Instrument Scientists and Controls Rep to travel • Working on the second part of the Baseline Change to incorporate ARRA effects into the baseline • Still need to incorporate two L2 milestones into schedule and adjust schedules appropriately (Waiting on TCCC) • First month of reporting on ARRA accounts has been completed • Some corrections are needed to the baseline – These will be incorporated in May
Schedule Advancement • XCS “Early Science” allows for a functioning XCS instrument one year earlier than original schedule
Project Risks and Mitigation • LUSI Follows the LCLS Risk Management Plan and uses the LCLS Risk Registry • LCLS Project Management Document 1.1-002 • Risk Registry Updated May, 2009 • Major Risks • Do something to cause loss or suspension of ARRA funds • Annual funding - Continuing Resolutions (Retired) • Foreign procurements – Dollar fluctuation, sole source • Loss and/or availability of critical personnel (Exercised) • Ability to place procurements in a timely manner • CXI mirror delivery, performance • XPP, XCS Monochromator delivery, performance • XPP, XCS Detector delivery, performance
Part of an Advance Procurement Review
LUSI Project’s Integrated Project Team DOE-HQ Harriet Kung, Acquisition Executive T.E. Kiess, Program Manager DOE-SSO Support DOE-SSO H. Joma DOE Federal Project Director Instrument Team Leaders LCLS Directorate Support Engineering, Procurement, QA, ES&H, Finance & Budget, PMCS SLAC T. Fornek LUSI Project Manager RM Boyce - Deputy Technical Configuration Control Committee . Installation Manager B. Poling WBS 1.2 XPP IIT D. Fritz (Instr. Scientist) WBS 1.3 CXI IIT S. Boutet (Instr. Scientist) WBS 1.4 XCS IIT A. Robert (Instr. Scientist) WBS 1.5 Diagnostics & Common Optics Y. Feng (Lead Scientist) WBS 1.6 Data Acquisition & Controls G. Haller (Lead)
Schedule Advancement • XCS “Early Science” allows for a functioning XCS instrument one year earlier than original schedule
CHARGE - 1 • Technical Scope • Is the design of the partial instrument mature and technically sound to enable early scientific experiments at LCLS? • Have all of the major interfaces been identified and incorporated in the design? • Have design reviews been performed? • Is the design likely to meet performance expectations? • Management • Is the instrument team organized and staffed to successfully achieve the milestone? • Have all the major risks been identified and effectively managed? • Are procurements appropriately planned for the partial instrument?
CHARGE - 2 • Cost and Schedule • Are the cost and schedule reasonable to achieve the planned scope? • Have the CXI cost and schedule been recently updated? • Is there sufficient cost and schedule contingency to ensure successful completion of the partial instrument on schedule? • ES&H • Are all related ES&H aspects being properly addressed? • Overall Readiness • Is CXI ready to begin fabrication and installation at LCLS to begin conducting early scientific experiments?