220 likes | 314 Views
COMPOSITE ANALYSIS OF THE SURFACE EFFECTS OF EL NINO SOUTHERN OSCILLATION TELECONNECTIONS ON ANTARCTICA.
E N D
COMPOSITE ANALYSIS OF THE SURFACE EFFECTS OF EL NINO SOUTHERN OSCILLATION TELECONNECTIONS ON ANTARCTICA Welhouse, L.J.1*, Lazzara, M.A.2, Tripoli, G.J.1, Keller, L.M.11Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison2Antarctic Meteorological Research Center, Space Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Outline • Background on ENSO interactions in the Antarctic • Data • European center for midrange weather forecasting(ECMWF) reanalysis(ERA)-40 • Automatic Weather Stations(AWS) • Verification • Composites • Discussion/Conclusions • Future work
ENSO Interactions • ENSO positive events induce a Pacific South American (PSA) pattern. • Negative events have a similar, though opposite, impact for much of the year. Karoly 1989
ENSO Interactions Mo and Higgins 1998
Data • ERA-40 • Use of 500 hPa geopotential heights • Surface Temperatures • Surface Pressures • AWS data • Used for verification, checked surface temperature
ERA-40 • Time period of study: 1979-2002 • This period is of higher accuracy than prior periods(Bromwich 2004) • Upper Level data used: 500 hPA heights contoured in 10gpm • Compared with prior work (Turner 2004) • Surface data: Pressure and Temperature • Used to both check for physical consistency with upper level and to determine surface effects • Used in both composite analysis and point comparisons with AWS stations to ensure the model reproduces ground stations accurately.
Many sites were analyzed, all being in relative agreement • Focus of Dome C, Dome C 2, Byrd, and Elaine gives us stations in three major regions where we see effects • Data primarily used in verification process
Verification BYRD STATION YEARS 1984-2002 • A comparison between station data and ERA-40 grid points interpolated to the station location • The first three data harmonics of each data set are removed to remove the annual cycle • Stations shown are Byrd, Elaine, Dome C, and Dome C II • All correlations between station and reanalysis are .8-.87
Verification ELAINE YEARS 1993-2002 DOME C YEARS 1980-1995
Verification DOME C II YEARS 1996-2002
Composite Analysis • Doing composites slightly differently from prior work • El Nino – neutral • La Nina – neutral • This can increase signal visibility in the composites • Definition of ENSO events is 5 month running mean sea surface temperature deviation of .4 degrees Celsius for at least 6 month (Trenberth 1997)
Composite Analysis • Trenberth definition was compared with a basis of events being a Multivariate ENSO index of more than one standard deviation from the mean.(Wolter 1993) • Focused on peak ENSO months, September-November(SON) and December-February(DJF) • Circled regions indicate statistical significance at either 95% or 90% as indicated.
Discussion/Conclusions • Composites seem to indicate El Nino and La Nina have different regional signals within Antarctica and especially in the case of La Nina these signals vary heavily within the season • Surface effects seem to be largely dependent on the location of the upper level signal. • Reasons for the difference in location of signal warrants further investigation • Potentially associated with changes in the Walker Circulation.
Future Work • Utilize ERA interim to expand the analysis into more recent ENSO events • Expand composites to other surface variables • Verify more stations to increase confidence in the model. • Investigate variations between El Nino and La Nina that could account for East Antarctic signal
Acknowledgements • This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. ANT-0636873 • ECMWF ERA-40 data used in this study/project have been provided by ECMWF/have been obtained from the ECMWF data server.
Citations • Automatic Weather Stations from the University of Wisconsin-Madison (http://amrc.ssec.wisc.edu) • Bromwich, D. H. and R. L. Fogt, 2004: Strong trends in the skill of the ERA-40 and NCEP–NCAR reanalyses in the high and middle latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere, 1958–2001. J. Climate, 17:4603–4619 • Fogt, R. L., and D. H. Bromwich, 2006: Decadal variability of the ENSO teleconnection to the high latitude South Pacific governed by coupling with the Southern Annular Mode. J. Climate, 19, 979-997. • Karoly, D. J., 1989: Southern Hemisphere circulation features associated with El Niño–Southern Oscillation events. J. Climate, 2:1239–1 • Kållberg, P., A. Simmons, S. Uppala and M. Fuentes: The ERA-40 archive. [Revised October 2007] September 2004 • Mo, K. C. and R. W. Higgins, 1998: The Pacific–South American modes and tropical convection during the Southern Hemisphere winter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126:1581–15 • Renwick, J. A., 1998: ENSO-related variability in the frequency of South Pacific blocking. Mon. Wea. Rev, 126:3117–3123 • Trenberth, K. E., 1997: The definition of El Niño. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 78:2771–2777 • Turner, J., 2004: Review: The El Niño-Southern Oscillation and Antarctica. Int. J. Climatol, 24:1–31. • Wolter, K., and M.S. Timlin, 1993: Monitoring ENSO in COADS with a seasonally adjusted principal component index. Proc. of the 17th Climate Diagnostics Workshop, Norman, OK, NOAA/NMC/CAC, NSSL, Oklahoma Clim. Survey, CIMMS and the School of Meteor., Univ. of Oklahoma, 52-57.