1 / 28

MUNICIPAL JOINT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA The Case of Kartamantul, Jogja Province

MUNICIPAL JOINT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA The Case of Kartamantul, Jogja Province. Wahyudi Kumorotomo, PhD kumoro@map.ugm.ac.id Master in Public Policy and Administration Gadjah Mada University Indonesia. International Workshop on Local Co-Creation and Manpower Policy in Asia,

channing-wells
Download Presentation

MUNICIPAL JOINT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA The Case of Kartamantul, Jogja Province

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MUNICIPAL JOINT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIAThe Case of Kartamantul, Jogja Province Wahyudi Kumorotomo, PhD kumoro@map.ugm.ac.id Master in Public Policy and Administration Gadjah Mada University Indonesia International Workshop on Local Co-Creation and Manpower Policy in Asia, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, 14 November 2009

  2. Current Issues in Indonesian Municipal Development Planning • After decentralization (2001), municipal development plannings are disintegrated by administrative jurisdictions • Problems of externalities in public services • Many initiatives for cross-border cooperations (Barlingmascakep, Gerbangkertosusila, etc.), limited examples of concrete follow-ups • Lack of focus on local issues (transports, waste management, drainage, disaster risk reduction, etc.) • Inability to promote community participation.

  3. Kartamantul Area

  4. Join Planning Approach Mutual learning;surveys, interviews, hearings, information gathering Share visions;views, ideas, values and knowledge Rules and institutions; identify regulations and available options to set up implementing institution Set up common priorities; ecological development, drainage or retention options, recreational options, floodproof housing, flood safety regulations, economic rules etc. Joint design; formulate master plans, feasibility studies, organizational design Implementation; from ideas into actions, distributing responsibilities, carry out tasks Monitoring and evaluation; actions are monitored, indicators are gauged, and results are evaluated.

  5. Joint Planning Principles • Foresight. Identify and address infrastructureissues according to current and future demands. • Responsiveness. To reduce the lengthy process of planning and implementation. • Co-ordination. To bring together all the stake-holders and formulate solution for common problems. • Judgement. Timely and reasonable decisions, with a sound technical, managerial,financial and contractual considerations. • Role Sharing. To share the costs, tasks, experience, and the risks of municipal policies.

  6. Sectoral Cooperation • Solid Waste Disposal Management • Sewerage System Management • Resource Water Management • Transport • Road • Drainage • Spatial Integrated Planning.

  7. Philosophy of Cooperation • Care ; a sincere comitment on realistic programs and concrete actions • Share; willingness to share costs, experience, benefits, and risks • Fair; focus on problem solving, “Win-Win Solution”.

  8. Solid Waste Management Cooperation

  9. The Shares of Operational & Maintenance Costs (Rp)

  10. Impoving Performance Before After

  11. Sewerage System Management Cooperation

  12. Shares of Operational & Maintenance Costs

  13. Sewerage Pipe Development

  14. Sewerage Aeration Instalation

  15. Water Resource Management Cooperation

  16. Water Resource Management • Water Resource Study • Institution Building • Tarriff • Investment • Public-Private Partnership

  17. Road Management Cooperation

  18. Road Management • Synchronize Planning & Budgeting • Construction & Rehabilitation • Improve quality of Roads & Bridges • Improve public utilities

  19. Transport Management Cooperation

  20. Transport Management Public Transport Reform Routes Park & Ride Double track railways system Hub Station Rest Area

  21. Drainage Management Cooperation

  22. Drainage Management Synchronize Planning & Budgeting Quality of Drainage Dimension Construction Dredging Sediment Flood Treatment

  23. Spatial Management Cooperation

  24. Spatial Management Synchronization of Planning, Budgeting & Controlling Zone Regulation (Recharge, Housing/Settlement, Green Area, Public Space etc) Standardization of Building Permit.

  25. Lesson Learned and Challenges • What is the most successful co-operation and co-creation in “Kartamantul”? •  Solid Waste Management • Next challenge in SWM: • Technology (incinerator, bio-gas?) • Behavioral change (reduce, reuse, recycle) • 3. Continued delivery of functions and roles • 4. Long-term institutional capacity • 5. Legal & Political Support.

  26. “Problems of Cross-Border Planning in Multi-State Conurbations” (Meyer, 1997): • Data; • No two jurisdiction necessary collect the same information. • 2. “Zero-Sum Game”; • Local authorities might perceive that benefit goes to an area at the expense of others. • 3. Common objectives; • It is generally difficult to agree on common objectives. • 4. Constituent; • No decision-making body has a single constituency. • 5. Authority to follow-up agreement; • It is difficult to coordinate activities that are not bound by law without sincere mutual agreement.

  27. Terima Kasih Arigato Gozaimas

More Related