1 / 5

Figura 1.

Figura 1. 1068. * P < 0.01. * P <0.01. *P<0.01. 770. * P < 0.01. 612. 473. pg/ ml. BNP PRE BNP POS. Tabla 1. Tabla 2. *¹ Período corto: Diferencias significativas entre el BNPpre y BNP post del grupo HDFOLd con respecto a los otros dos grupos. (*p< 0,05).

dagmar
Download Presentation

Figura 1.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Figura 1. 1068 * P < 0.01 * P <0.01 *P<0.01 770 * P < 0.01 612 473 pg/ ml BNP PRE BNP POS

  2. Tabla 1.

  3. Tabla 2 • *¹Período corto: Diferencias significativas entre el BNPpre y BNP post del grupo HDFOLd con respecto a los otros dos grupos. (*p< 0,05). • *² Período largo: Diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre el BNPpostL de HDFOLd con respecto al mismo de las otras dos técnicas - BNP pg/ml

  4. Tabla 3. • Grupo HDFOLd * p < 0,05. Diferencias Estadisticamente significativas entre: PAM preL vs PAM preC / PAM preL vs PAM postL/ PP preL vs PP postL • Grupo HDFOL * p< 0,05. Dif. Significativas enter :PAMpreL vs PAM postL/ PP preL vs PPpostL / PAMpreL vs PAMpreC/ PPpreL vsPPpreC • Grupo HDF * p< 0,05. Dif. Significativas enter :PAMpreL vs PAM postL / PAMpreL vs PAMpreC/

  5. Tabla 4. • * Diferencias Estadísticamente significativas entre eKR y PRU semanal del grupo HDFOLD, respecto a los otros dos grupos p < 0,01.

More Related